32 research outputs found
Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling for Batch State Estimation: Complexity, Algorithms, and Limits
In this paper, we focus on batch state estimation for linear systems. This
problem is important in applications such as environmental field estimation,
robotic navigation, and target tracking. Its difficulty lies on that limited
operational resources among the sensors, e.g., shared communication bandwidth
or battery power, constrain the number of sensors that can be active at each
measurement step. As a result, sensor scheduling algorithms must be employed.
Notwithstanding, current sensor scheduling algorithms for batch state
estimation scale poorly with the system size and the time horizon. In addition,
current sensor scheduling algorithms for Kalman filtering, although they scale
better, provide no performance guarantees or approximation bounds for the
minimization of the batch state estimation error. In this paper, one of our
main contributions is to provide an algorithm that enjoys both the estimation
accuracy of the batch state scheduling algorithms and the low time complexity
of the Kalman filtering scheduling algorithms. In particular: 1) our algorithm
is near-optimal: it achieves a solution up to a multiplicative factor 1/2 from
the optimal solution, and this factor is close to the best approximation factor
1/e one can achieve in polynomial time for this problem; 2) our algorithm has
(polynomial) time complexity that is not only lower than that of the current
algorithms for batch state estimation; it is also lower than, or similar to,
that of the current algorithms for Kalman filtering. We achieve these results
by proving two properties for our batch state estimation error metric, which
quantifies the square error of the minimum variance linear estimator of the
batch state vector: a) it is supermodular in the choice of the sensors; b) it
has a sparsity pattern (it involves matrices that are block tri-diagonal) that
facilitates its evaluation at each sensor set.Comment: Correction of typos in proof