Partial mixture model for tight clustering of gene expression time-course

Background: Tight clustering arose recently from a desire to obtain tighter and potentially more informative clusters in gene expression studies. Scattered genes with relatively loose correlations should be excluded from the clusters. However, in the literature there is little work dedicated to this area of research. On the other hand, there has been extensive use of maximum likelihood techniques for model parameter estimation. By contrast, the minimum distance estimator has been largely ignored. Results: In this paper we show the inherent robustness of the minimum distance estimator that makes it a powerful tool for parameter estimation in model-based time-course clustering. To apply minimum distance estimation, a partial mixture model that can naturally incorporate replicate information and allow scattered genes is formulated. We provide experimental results of simulated data fitting, where the minimum distance estimator demonstrates superior performance to the maximum likelihood estimator. Both biological and statistical validations are conducted on a simulated dataset and two real gene expression datasets. Our proposed partial regression clustering algorithm scores top in Gene Ontology driven evaluation, in comparison with four other popular clustering algorithms. Conclusion: For the first time partial mixture model is successfully extended to time-course data analysis. The robustness of our partial regression clustering algorithm proves the suitability of the ombination of both partial mixture model and minimum distance estimator in this field. We show that tight clustering not only is capable to generate more profound understanding of the dataset under study well in accordance to established biological knowledge, but also presents interesting new hypotheses during interpretation of clustering results. In particular, we provide biological evidences that scattered genes can be relevant and are interesting subjects for study, in contrast to prevailing opinion

Applying Gene Ontology to Microarray Gene Expression Data Analysis

[[conferencetype]]國際[[conferencedate]]20100701~20100703[[iscallforpapers]]Y[[conferencelocation]]Taipei, Taiwa

Techniques for clustering gene expression data

Many clustering techniques have been proposed for the analysis of gene expression data obtained from microarray experiments. However, choice of suitable method(s) for a given experimental dataset is not straightforward. Common approaches do not translate well and fail to take account of the data profile. This review paper surveys state of the art applications which recognises these limitations and implements procedures to overcome them. It provides a framework for the evaluation of clustering in gene expression analyses. The nature of microarray data is discussed briefly. Selected examples are presented for the clustering methods considered

Gene Expression Analysis Methods on Microarray Data a A Review

In recent years a new type of experiments are changing the way that biologists and other specialists analyze many problems. These are called high throughput experiments and the main difference with those that were performed some years ago is mainly in the quantity of the data obtained from them. Thanks to the technology known generically as microarrays, it is possible to study nowadays in a single experiment the behavior of all the genes of an organism under different conditions. The data generated by these experiments may consist from thousands to millions of variables and they pose many challenges to the scientists who have to analyze them. Many of these are of statistical nature and will be the center of this review. There are many types of microarrays which have been developed to answer different biological questions and some of them will be explained later. For the sake of simplicity we start with the most well known ones: expression microarrays

Improving biomarker list stability by integration of biological knowledge in the learning process

BACKGROUND: The identification of robust lists of molecular biomarkers related to a disease is a fundamental step for early diagnosis and treatment. However, methodologies for biomarker discovery using microarray data often provide results with limited overlap. It has been suggested that one reason for these inconsistencies may be that in complex diseases, such as cancer, multiple genes belonging to one or more physiological pathways are associated with the outcomes. Thus, a possible approach to improve list stability is to integrate biological information from genomic databases in the learning process; however, a comprehensive assessment based on different types of biological information is still lacking in the literature. In this work we have compared the effect of using different biological information in the learning process like functional annotations, protein-protein interactions and expression correlation among genes. RESULTS: Biological knowledge has been codified by means of gene similarity matrices and expression data linearly transformed in such a way that the more similar two features are, the more closely they are mapped. Two semantic similarity matrices, based on Biological Process and Molecular Function Gene Ontology annotation, and geodesic distance applied on protein-protein interaction networks, are the best performers in improving list stability maintaining almost equal prediction accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The performed analysis supports the idea that when some features are strongly correlated to each other, for example because are close in the protein-protein interaction network, then they might have similar importance and are equally relevant for the task at hand. Obtained results can be a starting point for additional experiments on combining similarity matrices in order to obtain even more stable lists of biomarkers. The implementation of the classification algorithm is available at the link: http://www.math.unipd.it/~dasan/biomarkers.html

Expression profiles of switch-like genes accurately classify tissue and infectious disease phenotypes in model-based classification

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Large-scale compilation of gene expression microarray datasets across diverse biological phenotypes provided a means of gathering a priori knowledge in the form of identification and annotation of bimodal genes in the human and mouse genomes. These switch-like genes consist of 15% of known human genes, and are enriched with genes coding for extracellular and membrane proteins. It is of interest to determine the prediction potential of bimodal genes for class discovery in large-scale datasets.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Use of a model-based clustering algorithm accurately classified more than 400 microarray samples into 19 different tissue types on the basis of bimodal gene expression. Bimodal expression patterns were also highly effective in differentiating between infectious diseases in model-based clustering of microarray data. Supervised classification with feature selection restricted to switch-like genes also recognized tissue specific and infectious disease specific signatures in independent test datasets reserved for validation. Determination of "on" and "off" states of switch-like genes in various tissues and diseases allowed for the identification of activated/deactivated pathways. Activated switch-like genes in neural, skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle tissue tend to have tissue-specific roles. A majority of activated genes in infectious disease are involved in processes related to the immune response.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Switch-like bimodal gene sets capture genome-wide signatures from microarray data in health and infectious disease. A subset of bimodal genes coding for extracellular and membrane proteins are associated with tissue specificity, indicating a potential role for them as biomarkers provided that expression is altered in the onset of disease. Furthermore, we provide evidence that bimodal genes are involved in temporally and spatially active mechanisms including tissue-specific functions and response of the immune system to invading pathogens.</p

Biomarker lists stability in genomic studies: analysis and improvement by prior biological knowledge integration into the learning process

The analysis of high-throughput sequencing, microarray and mass spectrometry data has been demonstrated extremely helpful for the identification of those genes and proteins, called biomarkers, helpful for answering to both diagnostic/prognostic and functional questions. In this context, robustness of the results is critical both to understand the biological mechanisms underlying diseases and to gain sufficient reliability for clinical/pharmaceutical applications. Recently, different studies have proved that the lists of identified biomarkers are poorly reproducible, making the validation of biomarkers as robust predictors of a disease a still open issue. The reasons of these differences are referable to both data dimensions (few subjects with respect to the number of features) and heterogeneity of complex diseases, characterized by alterations of multiple regulatory pathways and of the interplay between different genes and the environment. Typically in an experimental design, data to analyze come from different subjects and different phenotypes (e.g. normal and pathological). The most widely used methodologies for the identification of significant genes related to a disease from microarray data are based on computing differential gene expression between different phenotypes by univariate statistical tests. Such approach provides information on the effect of specific genes as independent features, whereas it is now recognized that the interplay among weakly up/down regulated genes, although not significantly differentially expressed, might be extremely important to characterize a disease status. Machine learning algorithms are, in principle, able to identify multivariate nonlinear combinations of features and have thus the possibility to select a more complete set of experimentally relevant features. In this context, supervised classification methods are often used to select biomarkers, and different methods, like discriminant analysis, random forests and support vector machines among others, have been used, especially in cancer studies. Although high accuracy is often achieved in classification approaches, the reproducibility of biomarker lists still remains an open issue, since many possible sets of biological features (i.e. genes or proteins) can be considered equally relevant in terms of prediction, thus it is in principle possible to have a lack of stability even by achieving the best accuracy. This thesis represents a study of several computational aspects related to biomarker discovery in genomic studies: from the classification and feature selection strategies to the type and the reliability of the biological information used, proposing new approaches able to cope with the problem of the reproducibility of biomarker lists. The study has highlighted that, although reasonable and comparable classification accuracy can be achieved by different methods, further developments are necessary to achieve robust biomarker lists stability, because of the high number of features and the high correlation among them. In particular, this thesis proposes two different approaches to improve biomarker lists stability by using prior information related to biological interplay and functional correlation among the analyzed features. Both approaches were able to improve biomarker selection. The first approach, using prior information to divide the application of the method into different subproblems, improves results interpretability and offers an alternative way to assess lists reproducibility. The second, integrating prior information in the kernel function of the learning algorithm, improves lists stability. Finally, the interpretability of results is strongly affected by the quality of the biological information available and the analysis of the heterogeneities performed in the Gene Ontology database has revealed the importance of providing new methods able to verify the reliability of the biological properties which are assigned to a specific feature, discriminating missing or less specific information from possible inconsistencies among the annotations. These aspects will be more and more deepened in the future, as the new sequencing technologies will monitor an increasing number of features and the number of functional annotations from genomic databases will considerably grow in the next years.L’analisi di dati high-throughput basata sull’utilizzo di tecnologie di sequencing, microarray e spettrometria di massa si è dimostrata estremamente utile per l’identificazione di quei geni e proteine, chiamati biomarcatori, utili per rispondere a quesiti sia di tipo diagnostico/prognostico che funzionale. In tale contesto, la stabilità dei risultati è cruciale sia per capire i meccanismi biologici che caratterizzano le malattie sia per ottenere una sufficiente affidabilità per applicazioni in campo clinico/farmaceutico. Recentemente, diversi studi hanno dimostrato che le liste di biomarcatori identificati sono scarsamente riproducibili, rendendo la validazione di tali biomarcatori come indicatori stabili di una malattia un problema ancora aperto. Le ragioni di queste differenze sono imputabili sia alla dimensione dei dataset (pochi soggetti rispetto al numero di variabili) sia all’eterogeneità di malattie complesse, caratterizzate da alterazioni di più pathway di regolazione e delle interazioni tra diversi geni e l’ambiente. Tipicamente in un disegno sperimentale, i dati da analizzare provengono da diversi soggetti e diversi fenotipi (e.g. normali e patologici). Le metodologie maggiormente utilizzate per l’identificazione di geni legati ad una malattia si basano sull’analisi differenziale dell’espressione genica tra i diversi fenotipi usando test statistici univariati. Tale approccio fornisce le informazioni sull’effetto di specifici geni considerati come variabili indipendenti tra loro, mentre è ormai noto che l’interazione tra geni debolmente up/down regolati, sebbene non differenzialmente espressi, potrebbe rivelarsi estremamente importante per caratterizzare lo stato di una malattia. Gli algoritmi di machine learning sono, in linea di principio, capaci di identificare combinazioni non lineari delle variabili e hanno quindi la possibilità di selezionare un insieme più dettagliato di geni che sono sperimentalmente rilevanti. In tale contesto, i metodi di classificazione supervisionata vengono spesso utilizzati per selezionare i biomarcatori, e diversi approcci, quali discriminant analysis, random forests e support vector machines tra altri, sono stati utilizzati, soprattutto in studi oncologici. Sebbene con tali approcci di classificazione si ottenga un alto livello di accuratezza di predizione, la riproducibilità delle liste di biomarcatori rimane ancora una questione aperta, dato che esistono molteplici set di variabili biologiche (i.e. geni o proteine) che possono essere considerati ugualmente rilevanti in termini di predizione. Quindi in teoria è possibile avere un’insufficiente stabilità anche raggiungendo il massimo livello di accuratezza. Questa tesi rappresenta uno studio su diversi aspetti computazionali legati all’identificazione di biomarcatori in genomica: dalle strategie di classificazione e di feature selection adottate alla tipologia e affidabilità dell’informazione biologica utilizzata, proponendo nuovi approcci in grado di affrontare il problema della riproducibilità delle liste di biomarcatori. Tale studio ha evidenziato che sebbene un’accettabile e comparabile accuratezza nella predizione può essere ottenuta attraverso diversi metodi, ulteriori sviluppi sono necessari per raggiungere una robusta stabilità nelle liste di biomarcatori, a causa dell’alto numero di variabili e dell’alto livello di correlazione tra loro. In particolare, questa tesi propone due diversi approcci per migliorare la stabilità delle liste di biomarcatori usando l’informazione a priori legata alle interazioni biologiche e alla correlazione funzionale tra le features analizzate. Entrambi gli approcci sono stati in grado di migliorare la selezione di biomarcatori. Il primo approccio, usando l’informazione a priori per dividere l’applicazione del metodo in diversi sottoproblemi, migliora l’interpretabilità dei risultati e offre un modo alternativo per verificare la riproducibilità delle liste. Il secondo, integrando l’informazione a priori in una funzione kernel dell’algoritmo di learning, migliora la stabilità delle liste. Infine, l’interpretabilità dei risultati è fortemente influenzata dalla qualità dell’informazione biologica disponibile e l’analisi delle eterogeneità delle annotazioni effettuata sul database Gene Ontology rivela l’importanza di fornire nuovi metodi in grado di verificare l’attendibilità delle proprietà biologiche che vengono assegnate ad una specifica variabile, distinguendo la mancanza o la minore specificità di informazione da possibili inconsistenze tra le annotazioni. Questi aspetti verranno sempre più approfonditi in futuro, dato che le nuove tecnologie di sequencing monitoreranno un maggior numero di variabili e il numero di annotazioni funzionali derivanti dai database genomici crescer`a considerevolmente nei prossimi anni

Contextual Analysis of Large-Scale Biomedical Associations for the Elucidation and Prioritization of Genes and their Roles in Complex Disease

Vast amounts of biomedical associations are easily accessible in public resources, spanning gene-disease associations, tissue-specific gene expression, gene function and pathway annotations, and many other data types. Despite this mass of data, information most relevant to the study of a particular disease remains loosely coupled and difficult to incorporate into ongoing research. Current public databases are difficult to navigate and do not interoperate well due to the plethora of interfaces and varying biomedical concept identifiers used. Because no coherent display of data within a specific problem domain is available, finding the latent relationships associated with a disease of interest is impractical. This research describes a method for extracting the contextual relationships embedded within associations relevant to a disease of interest. After applying the method to a small test data set, a large-scale integrated association network is constructed for application of a network propagation technique that helps uncover more distant latent relationships. Together these methods are adept at uncovering highly relevant relationships without any a priori knowledge of the disease of interest. The combined contextual search and relevance methods power a tool which makes pertinent biomedical associations easier to find, easier to assimilate into ongoing work, and more prominent than currently available databases. Increasing the accessibility of current information is an important component to understanding high-throughput experimental results and surviving the data deluge