An exact solution to the minimum size test pattern problem

This article addresses the problem of test pattern generation for single stuck-at faults in combinational circuits, under the additional constraint that the number of specified primary input assignments is minimized. This problem has different applications in testing, including the identification of “don’t care ” conditions to be used in the synthesis of Built-In Self-Test (BIST) logic. The proposed solution is based on an integer linear programming (ILP) formulation which builds on an existing Propositional Satisfiability (SAT) model for test pattern generation. The resulting ILP formulation is linear on the size of the original SAT model for test generation, which is linear on the size of the circuit. Nevertheless, the resulting ILP instances represent complex optimization problems, that require dedicated ILP algorithms. Preliminary results on benchmark circuits validate the practical applicability of the test pattern minimization model and associated ILP algorithm

Model enumeration in propositional circumscription via unsatisfiable core analysis

Many practical problems are characterized by a preference relation over admissible solutions, where preferred solutions are minimal in some sense. For example, a preferred diagnosis usually comprises a minimal set of reasons that is sufficient to cause the observed anomaly. Alternatively, a minimal correction subset comprises a minimal set of reasons whose deletion is sufficient to eliminate the observed anomaly. Circumscription formalizes such preference relations by associating propositional theories with minimal models. The resulting enumeration problem is addressed here by means of a new algorithm taking advantage of unsatisfiable core analysis. Empirical evidence of the efficiency of the algorithm is given by comparing the performance of the resulting solver, CIRCUMSCRIPTINO, with HCLASP, CAMUS MCS, LBX and MCSLS on the enumeration of minimal models for problems originating from practical applications. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.Comment: 15 pages, 2 algorithms, 2 tables, 2 figures, ICL

SAT-based Compressive Sensing

We propose to reduce the original well-posed problem of compressive sensing to weighted-MAX-SAT. Compressive sensing is a novel randomized data acquisition approach that linearly samples sparse or compressible signals at a rate much below the Nyquist-Shannon sampling rate. The original problem of compressive sensing in sparse recovery is NP-hard; therefore, in addition to restrictions for the uniqueness of the sparse solution, the coding matrix has also to satisfy additional stringent constraints -usually the restricted isometry property (RIP)- so we can handle it by its convex or nonconvex relaxations. In practice, such constraints are not only intractable to be verified but also invalid in broad applications. We first divide the well-posed problem of compressive sensing into relaxed sub-problems and represent them as separate SAT instances in conjunctive normal form (CNF). After merging the resulting sub-problems, we assign weights to all clauses in such a way that the aggregated weighted-MAX-SAT can guarantee successful recovery of the original signal. The only requirement in our approach is the solution uniqueness of the associated problems, which is notably looser. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the applicability of our approach in tackling the original problem of binary compressive sensing with binary design matrices. Experimental results demonstrate the supremacy of the proposed SAT-based compressive sensing over the $\ell_1$-minimization in the robust recovery of sparse binary signals. SAT-based compressive sensing on average requires 8.3% fewer measurements for exact recovery of highly sparse binary signals ($s/N\approx 0.1$). When $s/N \approx 0.5$, the $\ell_1$-minimization on average requires 22.2% more measurements for exact reconstruction of the binary signals. Thus, the proposed SAT-based compressive sensing is less sensitive to the sparsity of the original signals

Logic Synthesis for Quantum Computing

We present a synthesis framework to map logic networks into quantum circuits for quantum computing. The synthesis framework is based on LUT networks (lookup-table networks), which play a key role in conventional logic synthesis. Establishing a connection between LUTs in a LUT network and reversible single-target gates in a reversible network allows us to bridge conventional logic synthesis with logic synthesis for quantum computing, despite several fundamental differences. We call our synthesis framework LUT-based Hierarchical Reversible Logic Synthesis (LHRS). Input to LHRS is a classical logic network; output is a quantum network (realized in terms of Clifford+$T$ gates). The framework offers to trade-off the number of qubits for the number of quantum gates. In a first step, an initial network is derived that only consists of single-target gates and already completely determines the number of qubits in the final quantum network. Different methods are then used to map each single-target gate into Clifford+$T$ gates, while aiming at optimally using available resources. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in automatically synthesizing IEEE compliant floating point networks up to double precision. As many quantum algorithms target scientific simulation applications, they can make rich use of floating point arithmetic components. But due to the lack of quantum circuit descriptions for those components, it can be difficult to find a realistic cost estimation for the algorithms. Our synthesized benchmarks provide cost estimates that allow quantum algorithm designers to provide the first complete cost estimates for a host of quantum algorithms. Thus, the benchmarks and, more generally, the LHRS framework are an essential step towards the goal of understanding which quantum algorithms will be practical in the first generations of quantum computers.Comment: 15 pages, 10 figure

Computing Minimal Sets on Propositional Formulae I: Problems & Reductions

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is arguably the archetypical NP-complete decision problem. Progress in SAT solving algorithms has motivated an ever increasing number of practical applications in recent years. However, many practical uses of SAT involve solving function as opposed to decision problems. Concrete examples include computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets, minimal correction subsets, prime implicates and implicants, minimal models, backbone literals, and autarkies, among several others. In most cases, solving a function problem requires a number of adaptive or non-adaptive calls to a SAT solver. Given the computational complexity of SAT, it is therefore important to develop algorithms that either require the smallest possible number of calls to the SAT solver, or that involve simpler instances. This paper addresses a number of representative function problems defined on Boolean formulas, and shows that all these function problems can be reduced to a generic problem of computing a minimal set subject to a monotone predicate. This problem is referred to as the Minimal Set over Monotone Predicate (MSMP) problem. This exercise provides new ways for solving well-known function problems, including prime implicates, minimal correction subsets, backbone literals, independent variables and autarkies, among several others. Moreover, this exercise motivates the development of more efficient algorithms for the MSMP problem. Finally the paper outlines a number of areas of future research related with extensions of the MSMP problem.Comment: This version contains some fixes in formatting and bibliograph

Differentiable Satisfiability and Differentiable Answer Set Programming for Sampling-Based Multi-Model Optimization

We propose Differentiable Satisfiability and Differentiable Answer Set Programming (Differentiable SAT/ASP) for multi-model optimization. Models (answer sets or satisfying truth assignments) are sampled using a novel SAT/ASP solving approach which uses a gradient descent-based branching mechanism. Sampling proceeds until the value of a user-defined multi-model cost function reaches a given threshold. As major use cases for our approach we propose distribution-aware model sampling and expressive yet scalable probabilistic logic programming. As our main algorithmic approach to Differentiable SAT/ASP, we introduce an enhancement of the state-of-the-art CDNL/CDCL algorithm for SAT/ASP solving. Additionally, we present alternative algorithms which use an unmodified ASP solver (Clingo/clasp) and map the optimization task to conventional answer set optimization or use so-called propagators. We also report on the open source software DelSAT, a recent prototype implementation of our main algorithm, and on initial experimental results which indicate that DelSATs performance is, when applied to the use case of probabilistic logic inference, on par with Markov Logic Network (MLN) inference performance, despite having advantageous properties compared to MLNs, such as the ability to express inductive definitions and to work with probabilities as weights directly in all cases. Our experiments also indicate that our main algorithm is strongly superior in terms of performance compared to the presented alternative approaches which reduce a common instance of the general problem to regular SAT/ASP.Comment: Extended and revised version of a paper in the Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP2018

Cover Combinatorial Filters and their Minimization Problem (Extended Version)

Recent research has examined algorithms to minimize robots' resource footprints. The class of combinatorial filters (discrete variants of widely-used probabilistic estimators) has been studied and methods for reducing their space requirements introduced. This paper extends existing combinatorial filters by introducing a natural generalization that we dub cover combinatorial filters. In addressing the new -- but still NP-complete -- problem of minimization of cover filters, this paper shows that multiple concepts previously believed to be true about combinatorial filters (and actually conjectured, claimed, or assumed to be) are in fact false. For instance, minimization does not induce an equivalence relation. We give an exact algorithm for the cover filter minimization problem. Unlike prior work (based on graph coloring) we consider a type of clique-cover problem, involving a new conditional constraint, from which we can find more general relations. In addition to solving the more general problem, the algorithm also corrects flaws present in all prior filter reduction methods. In employing SAT, the algorithm provides a promising basis for future practical development.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figures, WAFR 202

Solving SAT and MaxSAT with a Quantum Annealer: Foundations, Encodings, and Preliminary Results

Quantum annealers (QAs) are specialized quantum computers that minimize objective functions over discrete variables by physically exploiting quantum effects. Current QA platforms allow for the optimization of quadratic objectives defined over binary variables (qubits), also known as Ising problems. In the last decade, QA systems as implemented by D-Wave have scaled with Moore-like growth. Current architectures provide 2048 sparsely-connected qubits, and continued exponential growth is anticipated, together with increased connectivity. We explore the feasibility of such architectures for solving SAT and MaxSAT problems as QA systems scale. We develop techniques for effectively encoding SAT -and, with some limitations, MaxSAT- into Ising problems compatible with sparse QA architectures. We provide the theoretical foundations for this mapping, and present encoding techniques that combine offline Satisfiability and Optimization Modulo Theories with on-the-fly placement and routing. Preliminary empirical tests on a current generation 2048-qubit D-Wave system support the feasibility of the approach for certain SAT and MaxSAT problems.Comment: under submission to Information and Computatio

Design Space Exploration as Quantified Satisfaction

We present novel algorithms for design and design space exploration. The designs discovered by these algorithms are compositions of function types specified in component libraries. Our algorithms reduce the design problem to quantified satisfiability and use advanced solvers to find solutions that represent useful systems. The algorithms we present in this paper are sound and complete and are guaranteed to discover correct designs of optimal size, if they exist. We apply our method to the design of Boolean systems and discover new and more optimal classical digital and quantum circuits for common arithmetic functions such as addition and multiplication. The performance of our algorithms is evaluated through extensive experimentation. We created a benchmark consisting of specifications of scalable synthetic digital circuits and real-world mirochips. We have generated multiple circuits functionally equivalent to the ones in the benchmark. The quantified satisfiability method shows more than four orders of magnitude speed-up, compared to a generate and test method that enumerates all non-isomorphic circuit topologies. Our approach generalizes circuit optimization. It uses arbitrary component libraries and has applications to areas such as digital circuit design, diagnostics, abductive reasoning, test vector generation, and combinatorial optimization

Approximating minimum representations of key Horn functions

Horn functions form a subclass of Boolean functions and appear in many different areas of computer science and mathematics as a general tool to describe implications and dependencies. Finding minimum sized representations for such functions with respect to most commonly used measures is a computationally hard problem that remains hard even for the important subclass of key Horn functions. In this paper we provide logarithmic factor approximation algorithms for key Horn functions with respect to all measures studied in the literature for which the problem is known to be hard.Comment: 23 page