Robust Feature Clustering for Unsupervised Speech Activity Detection

In certain applications such as zero-resource speech processing or very-low resource speech-language systems, it might not be feasible to collect speech activity detection (SAD) annotations. However, the state-of-the-art supervised SAD techniques based on neural networks or other machine learning methods require annotated training data matched to the target domain. This paper establish a clustering approach for fully unsupervised SAD useful for cases where SAD annotations are not available. The proposed approach leverages Hartigan dip test in a recursive strategy for segmenting the feature space into prominent modes. Statistical dip is invariant to distortions that lends robustness to the proposed method. We evaluate the method on NIST OpenSAD 2015 and NIST OpenSAT 2017 public safety communications data. The results showed the superiority of proposed approach over the two-component GMM baseline. Index Terms: Clustering, Hartigan dip test, NIST OpenSAD, NIST OpenSAT, speech activity detection, zero-resource speech processing, unsupervised learning.Comment: 5 Pages, 4 Tables, 1 Figur

Robust Speaker Clustering using Mixtures of von Mises-Fisher Distributions for Naturalistic Audio Streams

Speaker Diarization (i.e. determining who spoke and when?) for multi-speaker naturalistic interactions such as Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) sessions is a challenging task. In this study, we propose robust speaker clustering based on mixture of multivariate von Mises-Fisher distributions. Our diarization pipeline has two stages: (i) ground-truth segmentation; (ii) proposed speaker clustering. The ground-truth speech activity information is used for extracting i-Vectors from each speechsegment. We post-process the i-Vectors with principal component analysis for dimension reduction followed by lengthnormalization. Normalized i-Vectors are high-dimensional unit vectors possessing discriminative directional characteristics. We model the normalized i-Vectors with a mixture model consisting of multivariate von Mises-Fisher distributions. K-means clustering with cosine distance is chosen as baseline approach. The evaluation data is derived from: (i) CRSS-PLTL corpus; and (ii) three-meetings subset of AMI corpus. The CRSSPLTL data contain audio recordings of PLTL sessions which is student-led STEM education paradigm. Proposed approach is consistently better than baseline leading to upto 44.48% and 53.68% relative improvements for PLTL and AMI corpus, respectively. Index Terms: Speaker clustering, von Mises-Fisher distribution, Peer-led team learning, i-Vector, Naturalistic Audio.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figure

Toeplitz Inverse Covariance based Robust Speaker Clustering for Naturalistic Audio Streams

Speaker diarization determines who spoke and when? in an audio stream. In this study, we propose a model-based approach for robust speaker clustering using i-vectors. The ivectors extracted from different segments of same speaker are correlated. We model this correlation with a Markov Random Field (MRF) network. Leveraging the advancements in MRF modeling, we used Toeplitz Inverse Covariance (TIC) matrix to represent the MRF correlation network for each speaker. This approaches captures the sequential structure of i-vectors (or equivalent speaker turns) belonging to same speaker in an audio stream. A variant of standard Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm is adopted for deriving closed-form solution using dynamic programming (DP) and the alternating direction method of multiplier (ADMM). Our diarization system has four steps: (1) ground-truth segmentation; (2) i-vector extraction; (3) post-processing (mean subtraction, principal component analysis, and length-normalization) ; and (4) proposed speaker clustering. We employ cosine K-means and movMF speaker clustering as baseline approaches. Our evaluation data is derived from: (i) CRSS-PLTL corpus, and (ii) two meetings subset of the AMI corpus. Relative reduction in diarization error rate (DER) for CRSS-PLTL corpus is 43.22% using the proposed advancements as compared to baseline. For AMI meetings IS1000a and IS1003b, relative DER reduction is 29.37% and 9.21%, respectively.Comment: 6 Pages, 3 Fiigures, 5 Equation