307 research outputs found

    Robust peak-to-peak gain analysis using integral quadratic constraints

    Get PDF
    This work provides a framework to compute an upper bound on the robust peak-to-peak gain of discrete-time uncertain linear systems using integral quadratic constraints (IQCs). Such bounds are of particular interest in the computation of reachable sets and the ℓ1-norm, as well as when safety-critical constraints need to be satisfied pointwise in time. The use of ρ-hard IQCs with a terminal cost enables us to deal with a wide variety of uncertainty classes, for example, we provide ρ-hard IQCs with a terminal cost for the class of parametric uncertainties. This approach unifies, generalizes, and significantly improves state-of-the-art methods, which is also demonstrated in a numerical example

    Efficient Approaches for Enclosing the United Solution Set of the Interval Generalized Sylvester Matrix Equation

    Full text link
    In this work, we investigate the interval generalized Sylvester matrix equation AXB+CXD=F{\bf{A}}X{\bf{B}}+{\bf{C}}X{\bf{D}}={\bf{F}} and develop some techniques for obtaining outer estimations for the so-called united solution set of this interval system. First, we propose a modified variant of the Krawczyk operator which causes reducing computational complexity to cubic, compared to Kronecker product form. We then propose an iterative technique for enclosing the solution set. These approaches are based on spectral decompositions of the midpoints of A{\bf{A}}, B{\bf{B}}, C{\bf{C}} and D{\bf{D}} and in both of them we suppose that the midpoints of A{\bf{A}} and C{\bf{C}} are simultaneously diagonalizable as well as for the midpoints of the matrices B{\bf{B}} and D{\bf{D}}. Some numerical experiments are given to illustrate the performance of the proposed methods

    Maximum Hands-Off Control: A Paradigm of Control Effort Minimization

    Full text link
    In this paper, we propose a new paradigm of control, called a maximum hands-off control. A hands-off control is defined as a control that has a short support per unit time. The maximum hands-off control is the minimum support (or sparsest) per unit time among all controls that achieve control objectives. For finite horizon control, we show the equivalence between the maximum hands-off control and L1-optimal control under a uniqueness assumption called normality. This result rationalizes the use of L1 optimality in computing a maximum hands-off control. We also propose an L1/L2-optimal control to obtain a smooth hands-off control. Furthermore, we give a self-triggered feedback control algorithm for linear time-invariant systems, which achieves a given sparsity rate and practical stability in the case of plant disturbances. An example is included to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control.Comment: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015 (to appear

    Connections Between Adaptive Control and Optimization in Machine Learning

    Full text link
    This paper demonstrates many immediate connections between adaptive control and optimization methods commonly employed in machine learning. Starting from common output error formulations, similarities in update law modifications are examined. Concepts in stability, performance, and learning, common to both fields are then discussed. Building on the similarities in update laws and common concepts, new intersections and opportunities for improved algorithm analysis are provided. In particular, a specific problem related to higher order learning is solved through insights obtained from these intersections.Comment: 18 page

    The M33 Synoptic Stellar Survey. II. Mira Variables

    Get PDF
    We present the discovery of 1847 Mira candidates in the Local Group galaxy M33 using a novel semi-parametric periodogram technique coupled with a Random Forest classifier. The algorithms were applied to ~2.4x10^5 I-band light curves previously obtained by the M33 Synoptic Stellar Survey. We derive preliminary Period-Luminosity relations at optical, near- & mid-infrared wavelengths and compare them to the corresponding relations in the Large Magellanic Cloud.Comment: Includes small corrections to match the published versio
    corecore