SIGNCRYPTION ANALYZE

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview for the research that has been done so far in signcryption area. The paper also presents the extensions for the signcryption scheme and discusses the security in signcryption. The main contribution to this paper represents the implementation of the signcryption algorithm with the examples provided.ElGamal, elliptic curves, encryption, identity-based, proxy-signcryption, public key, ring-signcryption, RSA, signcryption

Improving the Efficiency of Report and Trace Ring Signatures

Ring signatures allow signers to produce verifiable signatures and remain anonymous within a set of signers (i.e., the ring) while doing so. They are well-suited to protocols that target anonymity as a primary goal, for example, anonymous cryptocurrencies. However, standard ring signatures do not ensure that signers are held accountable if they act maliciously. Fraser and Quaglia (CANS\u2721) introduced a ring signature variant that they called report and trace ring signatures which balances the anonymity guarantee of standard ring signatures with the need to hold signers accountable. In particular, report and trace ring signatures introduce a reporting system whereby ring members can report malicious message/signature pairs. A designated tracer can then revoke the signer\u27s anonymity if, and only if, a ring member submits a report to the tracer. Fraser and Quaglia present a generic construction of a report and trace ring signature scheme and outline an instantiation for which it is claimed that the complexity of signing is linear in the size of the ring $|R|$. In this paper, we introduce a new instantiation of Fraser and Quaglia\u27s generic report and trace ring signature construction. Our instantiation uses a pairing-based variant of ElGamal that we define. We demonstrate that our instantiation is more efficient. In fact, we highlight that the efficiency of Fraser and Quaglia\u27s instantiation omits a scaling factor of $\lambda$ where $\lambda$ is a security parameter. As such, the complexity of signing for their instantiation grows linearly in $\lambda \cdot |R|$. Our instantiation, on the other hand, achieves signing complexity linear in $|R|$. We also introduce a new pairing-free report and trace ring signature construction reaching a similar signing complexity. Whilst this construction requires some additional group exponentiations, it can be instantiated over any prime order group for which the Decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption holds

Group key establishment protocols: Pairing cryptography and verifiable secret sharing scheme

Thesis (Master)--Izmir Institute of Technology, Computer Engineering, Izmir, 2013Includes bibliographical references (leaves: 97-103)Text in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishx, 154 leavesThe aim of this study is to establish a common secret key over an open network for a group of user to be used then symmetrical secure communication between them. There are two methods of GKE protocol which are key agreement and key distribution. Key agreement is a mechanism whereby the parties jointly establish a common secret. As to key distribution, it is a mechanism whereby one of the parties creates or obtains a secret value and then securely distributes it to other parties. In this study, both methods is applied and analyzed in two different GKE protocols. Desirable properties of a GKE are security and efficiency. Security is attributed in terms of preventing attacks against passive and active adversary. Efficiency is quantified in terms of computation, communication and round complexity. When constructing a GKE, the challenge is to provide security and efficiency according to attributed and quantified terms. Two main cryptographic tools are selected in order to handle the defined challenge. One of them is bilinear pairing which is based on elliptic curve cryptography and another is verifiable secret sharing which is based on multiparty computation. In this thesis, constructions of these two GKE protocols are studied along with their communication models, security and efficiency analysis. Also, an implementation of four-user group size is developed utilizing PBC, GMP and OpenSSL Libraries for both two protocols

Comparative Analysis between Elgamal and NTRU Algorithms and their implementation of Digital Signature for Electronic Certificate

The emergence of electronic certificates, which are official documents in the form of digital files transmitted via the internet, facilitates the exchange of information. However, internet use has risks, such as data theft for fabricating and modifying information. This problem can be solved by applying a digital signature. This problem can be solved by applying a digital signature. The main concern in this research is how to perform a comparative analysis between asymmetric cryptographic Elgamal and NTRU (Nth-Degree Truncated Polynomial Ring) algorithms and their implementation of a digital signature as an effort to improve information security in electronic certificates. The stages of the research method are divided into the key generation process, signing, and verification. In the signing and verification process, the SHA-512 hash function is also used for hashing messages to be encrypted-decrypted and QR Code as the signature. Comparison of performance of NTRU with Elgamal algorithms required running at a pdf extension with security levels 80,128,192, 256 bits will be obtained from the templates.office.com website. The results obtained that the El Gamal algorithm is better than the NTRU algorithm, but at a higher security level, the NTRU algorithm is better than the Elgamal algorithm. In the verification experiment that has been carried out, it can be concluded that by using SHA-512 as a hash function, the N parameter used for NTRU must be greater than or equal to 512 to avoid error results from verification