4,429 research outputs found
Learning to bid in revenue-maximizing auctions
We consider the problem of the optimization of bidding strategies in
prior-dependent revenue-maximizing auctions, when the seller fixes the reserve
prices based on the bid distributions. Our study is done in the setting where
one bidder is strategic. Using a variational approach, we study the complexity
of the original objective and we introduce a relaxation of the objective
functional in order to use gradient descent methods. Our approach is simple,
general and can be applied to various value distributions and
revenue-maximizing mechanisms. The new strategies we derive yield massive
uplifts compared to the traditional truthfully bidding strategy
A Game-theoretic Machine Learning Approach for Revenue Maximization in Sponsored Search
Sponsored search is an important monetization channel for search engines, in
which an auction mechanism is used to select the ads shown to users and
determine the prices charged from advertisers. There have been several pieces
of work in the literature that investigate how to design an auction mechanism
in order to optimize the revenue of the search engine. However, due to some
unrealistic assumptions used, the practical values of these studies are not
very clear. In this paper, we propose a novel \emph{game-theoretic machine
learning} approach, which naturally combines machine learning and game theory,
and learns the auction mechanism using a bilevel optimization framework. In
particular, we first learn a Markov model from historical data to describe how
advertisers change their bids in response to an auction mechanism, and then for
any given auction mechanism, we use the learnt model to predict its
corresponding future bid sequences. Next we learn the auction mechanism through
empirical revenue maximization on the predicted bid sequences. We show that the
empirical revenue will converge when the prediction period approaches infinity,
and a Genetic Programming algorithm can effectively optimize this empirical
revenue. Our experiments indicate that the proposed approach is able to produce
a much more effective auction mechanism than several baselines.Comment: Twenty-third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(IJCAI 2013
Optimising Trade-offs Among Stakeholders in Ad Auctions
We examine trade-offs among stakeholders in ad auctions. Our metrics are the
revenue for the utility of the auctioneer, the number of clicks for the utility
of the users and the welfare for the utility of the advertisers. We show how to
optimize linear combinations of the stakeholder utilities, showing that these
can be tackled through a GSP auction with a per-click reserve price. We then
examine constrained optimization of stakeholder utilities.
We use simulations and analysis of real-world sponsored search auction data
to demonstrate the feasible trade-offs, examining the effect of changing the
allowed number of ads on the utilities of the stakeholders. We investigate both
short term effects, when the players do not have the time to modify their
behavior, and long term equilibrium conditions.
Finally, we examine a combinatorially richer constrained optimization
problem, where there are several possible allowed configurations (templates) of
ad formats. This model captures richer ad formats, which allow using the
available screen real estate in various ways. We show that two natural
generalizations of the GSP auction rules to this domain are poorly behaved,
resulting in not having a symmetric Nash equilibrium or having one with poor
welfare. We also provide positive results for restricted cases.Comment: 18 pages, 10 figures, ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
201
Generalized Second Price Auction with Probabilistic Broad Match
Generalized Second Price (GSP) auctions are widely used by search engines
today to sell their ad slots. Most search engines have supported broad match
between queries and bid keywords when executing GSP auctions, however, it has
been revealed that GSP auction with the standard broad-match mechanism they are
currently using (denoted as SBM-GSP) has several theoretical drawbacks (e.g.,
its theoretical properties are known only for the single-slot case and
full-information setting, and even in this simple setting, the corresponding
worst-case social welfare can be rather bad). To address this issue, we propose
a novel broad-match mechanism, which we call the Probabilistic Broad-Match
(PBM) mechanism. Different from SBM that puts together the ads bidding on all
the keywords matched to a given query for the GSP auction, the GSP with PBM
(denoted as PBM-GSP) randomly samples a keyword according to a predefined
probability distribution and only runs the GSP auction for the ads bidding on
this sampled keyword. We perform a comprehensive study on the theoretical
properties of the PBM-GSP. Specifically, we study its social welfare in the
worst equilibrium, in both full-information and Bayesian settings. The results
show that PBM-GSP can generate larger welfare than SBM-GSP under mild
conditions. Furthermore, we also study the revenue guarantee for PBM-GSP in
Bayesian setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work on
broad-match mechanisms for GSP that goes beyond the single-slot case and the
full-information setting
- …