Conditioning of Random Block Subdictionaries with Applications to Block-Sparse Recovery and Regression

The linear model, in which a set of observations is assumed to be given by a linear combination of columns of a matrix, has long been the mainstay of the statistics and signal processing literature. One particular challenge for inference under linear models is understanding the conditions on the dictionary under which reliable inference is possible. This challenge has attracted renewed attention in recent years since many modern inference problems deal with the "underdetermined" setting, in which the number of observations is much smaller than the number of columns in the dictionary. This paper makes several contributions for this setting when the set of observations is given by a linear combination of a small number of groups of columns of the dictionary, termed the "block-sparse" case. First, it specifies conditions on the dictionary under which most block subdictionaries are well conditioned. This result is fundamentally different from prior work on block-sparse inference because (i) it provides conditions that can be explicitly computed in polynomial time, (ii) the given conditions translate into near-optimal scaling of the number of columns of the block subdictionaries as a function of the number of observations for a large class of dictionaries, and (iii) it suggests that the spectral norm and the quadratic-mean block coherence of the dictionary (rather than the worst-case coherences) fundamentally limit the scaling of dimensions of the well-conditioned block subdictionaries. Second, this paper investigates the problems of block-sparse recovery and block-sparse regression in underdetermined settings. Near-optimal block-sparse recovery and regression are possible for certain dictionaries as long as the dictionary satisfies easily computable conditions and the coefficients describing the linear combination of groups of columns can be modeled through a mild statistical prior.Comment: 39 pages, 3 figures. A revised and expanded version of the paper published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2015.2429632); this revision includes corrections in the proofs of some of the result

A Multiple Hypothesis Testing Approach to Low-Complexity Subspace Unmixing

Subspace-based signal processing traditionally focuses on problems involving a few subspaces. Recently, a number of problems in different application areas have emerged that involve a significantly larger number of subspaces relative to the ambient dimension. It becomes imperative in such settings to first identify a smaller set of active subspaces that contribute to the observation before further processing can be carried out. This problem of identification of a small set of active subspaces among a huge collection of subspaces from a single (noisy) observation in the ambient space is termed subspace unmixing. This paper formally poses the subspace unmixing problem under the parsimonious subspace-sum (PS3) model, discusses connections of the PS3 model to problems in wireless communications, hyperspectral imaging, high-dimensional statistics and compressed sensing, and proposes a low-complexity algorithm, termed marginal subspace detection (MSD), for subspace unmixing. The MSD algorithm turns the subspace unmixing problem for the PS3 model into a multiple hypothesis testing (MHT) problem and its analysis in the paper helps control the family-wise error rate of this MHT problem at any level $\alpha \in [0,1]$ under two random signal generation models. Some other highlights of the analysis of the MSD algorithm include: (i) it is applicable to an arbitrary collection of subspaces on the Grassmann manifold; (ii) it relies on properties of the collection of subspaces that are computable in polynomial time; and ($iii$) it allows for linear scaling of the number of active subspaces as a function of the ambient dimension. Finally, numerical results are presented in the paper to better understand the performance of the MSD algorithm.Comment: Submitted for journal publication; 33 pages, 14 figure