European experience on the practical use of levosimendan in patients with acute heart failure syndromes

The novel calcium sensitizer and ATP-dependent potassium channel opener levosimendan has been introduced for routine use in several European countries. Recent reports on clinical experience confirm the positive hemodynamic results and beneficial clinical effects described in the initial dose-finding and randomized comparative therapeutic trials in patients with severe low-output heart failure. In addition, studies in small series of patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction and/or surgical interventions and post-interventional myocardial dysfunction (stunning) indicate that the inotropic and vasodilating actions of levosimendan may be of value in a wider range of indications. Dose recommendations, combination with other drugs, and potential side effects are discussed in this overview

Rationale and study design of intravenous loop diuretic administration in acute heart failure. DIUR-AHF

Aims: Although loop diuretics are the most commonly used drugs in acute heart failure (AHF) treatment, their short-term and long-term effects are relatively unknown. The significance of worsening renal function occurrence during intravenous treatment is not clear enough. This trial aims to clarify all these features and contemplate whether continuous infusion is better than an intermittent strategy in terms of decongestion efficacy, diuretic efficiency, renal function, and long-term prognosis. Methods and results: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized study that compares continuous infusion to intermittent infusion and a low vs. high diuretic dose of furosemide in patients with a diagnosis of acute heart failure, BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL, and specific chest X-ray signs. Randomization criteria have been established at a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated scheme of either twice-daily bolus injection or continuous infusion for a time period ranging from 72 to 120 h. The initial dose will be 80 mg/day of intravenous furosemide and, in the case of poor response, will be doubled using an escalation algorithm. A high diuretic dose is defined as a furosemide daily amount >120 mg/day respectively. Conclusions: Continuous and high dose groups could reveal a more intensive diuresis and a greater decongestion with respect to intermittent and low dose groups; high dose and poor loop diuretic efficiency should be related to increased diuretic resistance, renal dysfunction occurrence, and greater congestion status. Poor diuretic response will be associated with less decongestion and an adverse prognosis

Cardiorenal syndrome

published_or_final_versio

Clinical and Research Considerations for Patients with Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure

Management approaches for patients in the emergency department (ED) who present with acute heart failure (AHF) have largely focused on intravenous diuretics. Yet, the primary pathophysiologic derangement underlying AHF in many patients is not solely volume overload. Patients with hypertensive AHF (H-AHF) represent a clinical phenotype with distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms that result in elevated ventricular filling pressures. To optimize treatment response and minimize adverse events in this subgroup, we propose that clinical management be tailored to a conceptual model of disease based on these mechanisms. This consensus statement reviews the relevant pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, approach to therapy, and considerations for clinical trials in ED patients with H-AHF

Rapid clinical assessment of hemodynamic profiles and targeted treatment of patient with acutely decompensated heart failure

Acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is characterized by hemodynamic abnormalities and neurohormonal activation that contribute to heart failure (HF) symptoms, end‐organ dysfunction, arrhythmias, and progressive cardiac failure. The management of ADHF in the emergency department (ED) can be simplified and improved by a 2‐min bedside assessment that identifies any of four possible hemodynamic profiles on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms. The profiles are based on whether congestion is present or absent (wet or dry) and perfusion is adequate or limited (warm or cold). A wet‐warm profile is seen more frequently in the ED than any of the other three profiles (wet‐cold, dry‐warm, and dry‐cold). The four clinically determined profiles have been shown to predict clinical outcomes and may be used to guide initial HF therapy. The goals of treating ADHF are to stabilize the patient, reverse acute hemodynamic abnormalities, rapidly reverse dyspnea and/or hypoxemia caused by pulmonary congestion, and initiate treatments that will decrease disease progression and improve survival. An ideal agent for the wet‐warm profile would rapidly reduce pulmonary congestion, produce balanced arterial and venous dilation, promote natriuresis, lack direct positive inotropic effects, and not cause reflex neuroendocrine activation. Intravenous nesiritide in conjunction with loop diuretics has been found safe and effective as initial treatment for patients with the wet‐warm profile. For the wet‐cold profile, more intensive therapy and invasive hemodynamic monitoring may prove useful. This review will discuss the rapid clinical determination of hemodynamic profiles in patients presenting to the ED with ADHF and the options for their initial medical management. Case studies representing the wet‐warm, wet‐cold, dry‐warm, and dry‐cold profiles will be presented and discussed.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/107535/1/4960271702_ftp.pd

Clinical applications of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing

Many claims have been made in recent years regarding the utility of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration measurements in the diagnosis, risk stratification and monitoring of patients with heart failure. This paper summarizes the current evidence and provides guidance for practising clinicians. Overall, plasma BNP testing appears to be of most value in the diagnostic arena, where it is likely to improve the performance of non-specialist physicians in diagnosing heart failure. In clinical practice, BNP testing is best used as a ‘rule out' test for suspected cases of new heart failure in breathless patients presenting to either the outpatient or emergency care settings; it is not a replacement for echocardiography and full cardiological assessment, which will be required for patients with an elevated BNP concentration. Although work is ongoing in establishing the ‘normal' values of BNP, heart failure appears to be highly unlikely below a plasma concentration of 100pg/ml. However, as BNP levels rise with age and are affected by gender, comorbidity and drug therapy, the plasma BNP measurement should not be used in isolation from the clinical contex

Approach to Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Acute heart failure (AHF) patients rarely present complaining of ‘acute heart failure.’ Rather, they initially present to the emergency department (ED) with a myriad of chief complaints, symptoms, and physical exam findings. Such heterogeneity prompts an initially broad differential diagnosis; securing the correct diagnosis can be challenging. Although AHF may be the ultimate diagnosis, the precipitant of decompensation must also be sought and addressed. For those AHF patients who present in respiratory or circulatory failure requiring immediate stabilization, treatment begins even while the diagnosis is uncertain. The initial diagnostic workup consists of a thorough history and exam (with a particular focus on the cause of decompensation), an EKG, chest X-ray, laboratory testing, and point-of-care ultrasonography performed by a qualified clinician or technologist. We recommend initial treatment be guided by presenting phenotype. Hypertensive patients, particularly those in severe distress and markedly elevated blood pressure, should be treated aggressively with vasodilators, most commonly nitroglycerin. Normotensive patients generally require significant diuresis with intravenous loop diuretics. A small minority of patients present with hypotension or circulatory collapse. These patients are the most difficult to manage and require careful assessment of intra- and extra-vascular volume status. After stabilization, diagnosis, and management, most ED patients with AHF in the United States (US) are admitted. While this is understandable, it may be unnecessary. Ongoing research to improve diagnosis, initial treatment, risk stratification, and disposition may help ease the tremendous public health burden of AHF

Management of hyperkalemia in the acutely ill patient.

PURPOSE:To review the mechanisms of action, expected efficacy and side effects of strategies to control hyperkalemia in acutely ill patients. METHODS:We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant papers published in English between Jan 1, 1938, and July 1, 2018, in accordance with the PRISMA Statement using the following terms: "hyperkalemia," "intensive care," "acute kidney injury," "acute kidney failure," "hyperkalemia treatment," "renal replacement therapy," "dialysis," "sodium bicarbonate," "emergency," "acute." Reports from within the past 10 years were selected preferentially, together with highly relevant older publications. RESULTS:Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality and may cause cardiac electrophysiological disturbances in the acutely ill patient. Frequently used therapies for hyperkalemia may, however, also be associated with morbidity. Therapeutics may include the simultaneous administration of insulin and glucose (associated with frequent dysglycemic complications), β-2 agonists (associated with potential cardiac ischemia and arrhythmias), hypertonic sodium bicarbonate infusion in the acidotic patient (representing a large hypertonic sodium load) and renal replacement therapy (effective but invasive). Potassium-lowering drugs can cause rapid decrease in serum potassium level leading to cardiac hyperexcitability and rhythm disorders. CONCLUSIONS:Treatment of hyperkalemia should not only focus on the ability of specific therapies to lower serum potassium level but also on their potential side effects. Tailoring treatment to the patient condition and situation may limit the risks