11,251 research outputs found
Resource modalities in game semantics
The description of resources in game semantics has never achieved the
simplicity and precision of linear logic, because of a misleading conception:
the belief that linear logic is more primitive than game semantics. We advocate
instead the contrary: that game semantics is conceptually more primitive than
linear logic. Starting from this revised point of view, we design a categorical
model of resources in game semantics, and construct an arena game model where
the usual notion of bracketing is extended to multi- bracketing in order to
capture various resource policies: linear, affine and exponential
Relational semantics of linear logic and higher-order model-checking
In this article, we develop a new and somewhat unexpected connection between
higher-order model-checking and linear logic. Our starting point is the
observation that once embedded in the relational semantics of linear logic, the
Church encoding of any higher-order recursion scheme (HORS) comes together with
a dual Church encoding of an alternating tree automata (ATA) of the same
signature. Moreover, the interaction between the relational interpretations of
the HORS and of the ATA identifies the set of accepting states of the tree
automaton against the infinite tree generated by the recursion scheme. We show
how to extend this result to alternating parity automata (APT) by introducing a
parametric version of the exponential modality of linear logic, capturing the
formal properties of colors (or priorities) in higher-order model-checking. We
show in particular how to reunderstand in this way the type-theoretic approach
to higher-order model-checking developed by Kobayashi and Ong. We briefly
explain in the end of the paper how his analysis driven by linear logic results
in a new and purely semantic proof of decidability of the formulas of the
monadic second-order logic for higher-order recursion schemes.Comment: 24 pages. Submitte
Logics for modelling collective attitudes
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional
attitudes that are defined by means of the majority rule. It is well known that majoritarian
aggregation is subject to irrationality, as the results in social choice theory and judgment
aggregation show. The proposed logics for modelling collective attitudes are based on
a substructural propositional logic that allows for circumventing inconsistent outcomes.
Individual and collective propositional attitudes, such as beliefs, desires, obligations, are
then modelled by means of minimal modalities to ensure a number of basic principles. In
this way, a viable consistent modelling of collective attitudes is obtained
Modal logics are coalgebraic
Applications of modal logics are abundant in computer science, and a large number of structurally different modal logics have been successfully employed in a diverse spectrum of application contexts. Coalgebraic semantics, on the other hand, provides a uniform and encompassing view on the large variety of specific logics used in particular domains. The coalgebraic approach is generic and compositional: tools and techniques simultaneously apply to a large class of application areas and can moreover be combined in a modular way. In particular, this facilitates a pick-and-choose approach to domain specific formalisms, applicable across the entire scope of application areas, leading to generic software tools that are easier to design, to implement, and to maintain. This paper substantiates the authors' firm belief that the systematic exploitation of the coalgebraic nature of modal logic will not only have impact on the field of modal logic itself but also lead to significant progress in a number of areas within computer science, such as knowledge representation and concurrency/mobility
- …