Management of Phytophthora cinnamomi for biodiversity conservation in Australia: Part 2. National best practice guidelines

Disease in natural ecosystems of Australia, caused by the introduced plant pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi, is listed as a key threatening process under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Act requires the Australian Government to prepare and implement a threat abatement plan for nationally coordinated action to mitigate the harm caused by P. cinnamomi to Australian species, particularly threatened flora, fauna and ecological communities. The .National Threat Abatement Plan for Dieback Caused by the Root-Rot Fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi. (NTAP) was released in 2001 (Environment Australia, 2001). The NTAP is designed to promote a common understanding of the national threat P. cinnamomi poses to biodiversity in Australia. This project, funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage (DEH), is one of the most significant actions to be implemented from the NTAP to date. The project has two major components: * to review current management approaches and identify benchmarks for best practice * the development of risk assessment criteria and a system for prioritising management of assets that are or could be threatened by P. cinnamomi. The project outputs are presented in a four-part document entitled Management of Phytophthora cinnamomi for Biodiversity Conservation in Australia: Part 1 - A Review of Current Management Part 2 - National Best Practice Guidelines Part 3 - Risk Assessment for Threats to Ecosystems, Species and Communities: A Review Part 4 - Risk Assessment Models for Species, Ecological Communities and Areas. A model of best practice was developed which encompasses all the components necessary for an informed and integrated approach to P. cinnamomi management, from strategic through to on-ground management. The current document (Part 1 . A Review of Current Management) thoroughly reviews the approaches to P. cinnamomi management in Australia within the context of the best practice model

Negotiating disciplinary boundaries in engineering problem-solving practice

Includes bibliographical referencesThe impetus for this research is the well-documented current inability of Higher Education to facilitate the level of problem solving required in 21st century engineering practice. The research contends that there is insufficient understanding of the nature of and relationship between the significantly different forms of disciplinary knowledge underpinning engineering practice. Situated in the Sociology of Education, and drawing on the social realist concepts of knowledge structures (Bernstein, 2000) and epistemic relations (Maton, 2014), the research maps the topology of engineering problem-solving practice in order to illuminate how novice problem solvers engage in epistemic code shifting in different industrial contexts. The aim in mapping problem-solving practices from an epistemological perspective is to make an empirical contribution to rethinking the theory/practice relationship in multidisciplinary engineering curricula and pedagogy, particularly at the level of technician. A novel and pragmatic problem-solving model - integrated from a range of disciplines - forms the organising framework for a methodologically pluralist case-study approach. The research design draws on a metaphor from the empirical site (modular automation systems) and sees the analysis of twelve matched cases in three categories. Case-study data consist of questionnaire texts, re-enactment interviews, expert verification interviews, and industry literature. The problem-solving model components (problem solver, problem environment, problem structure and problem-solving process) were analysed using, primarily, the Legitimation Code Theory concept of epistemic relations. This is a Cartesian plane-based instrument describing the nature of and relations between a phenomenon (what) and ways of approaching the phenomenon (how). Data analyses are presented as graphical relational maps of different practitioner knowledge practices in different contexts across three problem solving stages: approach, analysis and synthesis. Key findings demonstrate a symbiotic, structuring relationship between the 'what' and the 'how' of the problem in relation to the problem-solving components. Successful problem solving relies on the recognition of these relationships and the realisation of appropriate practice code conventions, as held to be legitimate both epistemologically and contextually. Successful practitioners engage in explicit code-shifting, generally drawing on a priori physics and mathematics-based knowledge, while acquiring a posteriori context-specific logic-based knowledge. High-achieving practitioners across these disciplinary domains demonstrate iterative code-shifting practices and discursive sensitivity. Recommendations for engineering education include the valuing of disciplinary differences and the acknowledgement of contextual complexity. It is suggested that the nature of engineering mathematics as currently taught and the role of mathematical thinking in enabling successful engineering problem-solving practice be investigated

Project Execution and Offshore Field Development in the Current Oil Market Downturn

This Record of Study presents the author’s experience in the capacity of riser lead and technical advisor working on multiple engineering and management project assignments by Cuneiform Offshore Consulting (Cuneiform). Cuneiform is a consulting firm based in Houston, Texas, specialized in providing engineering, technical advisory and project management services to the offshore energy industry. The author provided direct technical and managerial support to several of Noble Energy’s field developments in Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and Eastern Mediterranean; and, performed CVA (Certified Verification Agent) duties on behalf of BSEE (Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement) by conducting riser design, fabrication and installation verification for risers intended for operation in two different GOM developments. The author’s assignments were comprised of different technical and managerial challenges related to design, engineering, fabrication and installation of offshore risers. A fundamental goal and imperative challenge was to minimize project execution and operational risks and costs. The author emphasizes the importance of correct hazard identification, appropriate risk assessments, good decision making and judgement to ensure the health, safety and protection of the offshore personnel, the public and the environment, as well as the avoidance of incidents through proper riser design and proper execution to help safeguard the offshore asset and the interest of all stakeholders. The engineering and execution of offshore dynamic risers require a detailed understanding of the internal and external environment and interfaces. Early assessment of key design considerations during feasibility and concept selection phases was of utmost importance as it allowed for the identification of technical gaps and risk evaluation. Indeed, particular attention was given to the riser type selection philosophy with respect to host floater types, field configurations, environmental conditions, and fluid properties amongst primary parameters. Moreover, the author’s experience highlights the importance of staffing, teamwork, communication, planning, management, leadership and decision making as key factors and challenges to the overall project execution success. Furthermore, organizational elements such as talent identification, retention and acquisition; continuous investment into innovation and R&D; risk assessment and minimization; ability to adapt to changing market demands; cost control; and maintaining a cash flow positive organization with access to capital are found to contribute to an enhanced operational efficiency. The thorough assessment of outcomes for each project provided valuable technical and managerial lessons. The acquired experience and proper implementation of the gathered lessons from past projects enables better execution of future projects. Finally, the overall outcome and success of any project can be judged by assessing its technical rigor and robustness as well as the efficacy in its managerial decisions, approaches, processes, priorities and execution

“Asset Partner” Service model – Challenges and Opportunities for service industry. - A case from Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS)

The oil and gas (O&G) industry is facing numerous challenges, including fluctuating oil prices, increasing regulatory pressures, and a growing demand for cleaner energy sources. To remain competitive and maximize value creation, companies must adopt customized and flexible approaches to their offshore operations and think of new solutions to solve tomorrow’s challenges. Examining the concept and implications of an Asset Partner reveals various opportunities and challenges for both operator- and service companies. In recent years, operational partnerships have emerged as a strategic solution for companies aiming to optimize their operations, minimize risks, and enhance their competitive edge. The Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) presents a unique operating environment, combining harsh climatic conditions, advanced technologies, and stringent safety and environmental standards. Operating in this challenging environment requires specialized knowledge, strong regulatory compliance, and a commitment to sustainable practices. By forming alliances with third-party service providers, O&G companies can leverage external expertise, share risks, and pool resources to achieve common objectives. While partnerships offer several benefits, there are also notable challenges in the collaboration between operator companies and oil service companies on the NCS. This thesis will examine various perspectives, including those of operator companies that typically manage their assets independently, as well as the viewpoints of oil service companies, trade unions, and governmental authorities. The thesis aims to investigate the following research questions: 1. What are the benefits and challenges of implementing an "Asset Partner" model in the Oil and Gas (O&G) industry, and how can it be used to increase competitiveness in the market? 2. How do regulations and authorities, such as the Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) impact the implementation and success of the "Asset Partner" model in the O&G industry? 3. How does the "Asset Partner" model compare to traditional contractor and partnership models such as Technical Service Provider (TSP) model. 4. What are the specific business models and strategies that can be used to effectively implement the "Asset Partner" model in the O&G industry? A case study was conducted, involving data collection through interviews with professionals representing various roles in the industry. These included individuals from operator companies, oil service companies, trade unions, and government or regulatory authorities. The insights gathered from their responses have served as the base for addressing the research questions. The study reveals the complications and aspects related to the Asset Partner model. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the opportunities, challenges, and potential future implications of this model from the perspectives of operator companies, trade unions, oil service companies, and governmental authorities. It reveals that the Asset Partner model in the O&G industry offers the potential of significant benefits, including increased efficiency, cost savings, and access to specialized resources I terms of competence and capacity. However, challenges such as the loss of control over critical activities and potential erosion of core competencies must be carefully managed. The green transition and technological advancements can also have an impact in the future of the Asset Partner model in the future, emphasizing the need for regulatory adjustments for its sustainable implementation and alignment with environmental goals. To effectively implement the Asset Partner model, clear contractual agreements, open communication, performance monitoring, risk management, and competence development are essential. The research suggests a need for further research and collaboration among stakeholders to develop best practices, guidelines, and regulatory frameworks for the successful operation of the Asset Partner model in the O&G industry

Water in the Green Economy: Capacity Development Aspects

This book discusses needs related to capacity development for water resources management, including water supply and sanitation, in the context of the green economy. It showcases theoretical and practical approaches with proven success. Most contributions come from members and partners within the interagency mechanism, UN-Water. The 11 case studies in this book range from innovative design and delivery of capacity development programs related to water in the green economy, market mechanisms, and quality control procedures supporting capacity development success towards the practical implementation of programs to enhance individual and institutional capacity

Project Execution and Offshore Field Development in the Current Oil Market Downturn

This Record of Study presents the author’s experience in the capacity of riser lead and technical advisor working on multiple engineering and management project assignments by Cuneiform Offshore Consulting (Cuneiform). Cuneiform is a consulting firm based in Houston, Texas, specialized in providing engineering, technical advisory and project management services to the offshore energy industry. The author provided direct technical and managerial support to several of Noble Energy’s field developments in Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and Eastern Mediterranean; and, performed CVA (Certified Verification Agent) duties on behalf of BSEE (Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement) by conducting riser design, fabrication and installation verification for risers intended for operation in two different GOM developments. The author’s assignments were comprised of different technical and managerial challenges related to design, engineering, fabrication and installation of offshore risers. A fundamental goal and imperative challenge was to minimize project execution and operational risks and costs. The author emphasizes the importance of correct hazard identification, appropriate risk assessments, good decision making and judgement to ensure the health, safety and protection of the offshore personnel, the public and the environment, as well as the avoidance of incidents through proper riser design and proper execution to help safeguard the offshore asset and the interest of all stakeholders. The engineering and execution of offshore dynamic risers require a detailed understanding of the internal and external environment and interfaces. Early assessment of key design considerations during feasibility and concept selection phases was of utmost importance as it allowed for the identification of technical gaps and risk evaluation. Indeed, particular attention was given to the riser type selection philosophy with respect to host floater types, field configurations, environmental conditions, and fluid properties amongst primary parameters. Moreover, the author’s experience highlights the importance of staffing, teamwork, communication, planning, management, leadership and decision making as key factors and challenges to the overall project execution success. Furthermore, organizational elements such as talent identification, retention and acquisition; continuous investment into innovation and R&D; risk assessment and minimization; ability to adapt to changing market demands; cost control; and maintaining a cash flow positive organization with access to capital are found to contribute to an enhanced operational efficiency. The thorough assessment of outcomes for each project provided valuable technical and managerial lessons. The acquired experience and proper implementation of the gathered lessons from past projects enables better execution of future projects. Finally, the overall outcome and success of any project can be judged by assessing its technical rigor and robustness as well as the efficacy in its managerial decisions, approaches, processes, priorities and execution

Service company's adaptation of supply chain to cope with volatile oil and gas market

The oil and gas market has great significance across the globe, but the unpredictability in this industry is a huge challenge that affects all the supply chains in this market. These conditions contribute to a competitive and diverse market where service firms struggle to keep productivity in order to lower costs and boost operating performance. This paper gathers data on the oilfield service industry and explore existing literature on service supply chain agility to discover empirically the application of strategies that can be implemented within the sector. The major difficulties and risks faced during an oil crisis were identified through analyses on the performance of the leading global service provider (Schlumberger). Global mobility and supplier related challenges were found to be the main factors that harm the company's capacity to deal with market fluctuations. And the constructive tactics developed to achieve a strategic edge over competition have been used as the foundation of this study. Through executives’ interview, internal documentation research and relevant literature review it was discovered that agility in Schlumberger was attained by establishing supply chain visibility and the development of flexible policies and processes. By leveraging internal capabilities and digital solutions to enhance the procurement activities and overcome the looming risks it´s possible to successfully operate in complex market. A recommendation framework was presented as supply chain managers’ benchmarking scheme. This framework highlighted approaches that can be taken in terms of suppliers, internal capabilities and customers as a way to contribute to greater supply chain agility