Relevance Scoring of Triples Using Ordinal Logistic Classification - The Celosia Triple Scorer at WSDM Cup 2017

In this paper, we report our participation in the Task 2: Triple Scoring of WSDM Cup challenge 2017. In this task, we were provided with triples of "type-like" relations which were given human-annotated relevance scores ranging from 0 to 7, with 7 being the "most relevant" and 0 being the "least relevant". The task focuses on two such relations: profession and nationality. We built a system which could automatically predict the relevance scores for unseen triples. Our model is primarily a supervised machine learning based one in which we use well-designed features which are used to a make a Logistic Ordinal Regression based classification model. The proposed system achieves an overall accuracy score of 0.73 and Kendall's tau score of 0.36.Comment: Triple Scorer at WSDM Cup 2017, see arXiv:1712.0808

Overview of the Triple Scoring Task at the WSDM Cup 2017

This paper provides an overview of the triple scoring task at the WSDM Cup 2017, including a description of the task and the dataset, an overview of the participating teams and their results, and a brief account of the methods employed. In a nutshell, the task was to compute relevance scores for knowledge-base triples from relations, where such scores make sense. Due to the way the ground truth was constructed, scores were required to be integers from the range 0..7. For example, reasonable scores for the triples "Tim Burton profession Director" and "Tim Burton profession Actor" would be 7 and 2, respectively, because Tim Burton is well-known as a director, but he acted only in a few lesser known movies. The triple scoring task attracted considerable interest, with 52 initial registrations and 21 teams who submitted a valid run before the deadline. The winning team achieved an accuracy of 87%, that is, for that fraction of the triples from the test set (which was revealed only after the deadline) the difference to the score from the ground truth was at most 2. The best result for the average difference from the test set scores was 1.50