34,162 research outputs found
LOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PARTITIONING OF MIND: DEPICTING THE SAME MAP?
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that empirically delimited structures of mind are also differentiable by means of systematic logical analysis. In the sake of this aim, the paper first summarizes Demetriou's theory of cognitive organization and growth. This theory assumes that the mind is a multistructural entity that develops across three fronts: the processing system that constrains processing potentials, a set of specialized structural systems (SSSs) that guide processing within different reality and knowledge domains, and a hypecognitive system that monitors and controls the functioning of all other systems. In the second part the paper focuses on the SSSs, which are the target of our logical analysis, and it summarizes a series of empirical studies demonstrating their autonomous operation. The third part develops the logical proof showing that each SSS involves a kernel element that cannot be reduced to standard logic or to any other SSS. The implications of this analysis for the general theory of knowledge and cognitive development are discussed in the concluding part of the paper
On Spatial Conjunction as Second-Order Logic
Spatial conjunction is a powerful construct for reasoning about dynamically
allocated data structures, as well as concurrent, distributed and mobile
computation. While researchers have identified many uses of spatial
conjunction, its precise expressive power compared to traditional logical
constructs was not previously known. In this paper we establish the expressive
power of spatial conjunction. We construct an embedding from first-order logic
with spatial conjunction into second-order logic, and more surprisingly, an
embedding from full second order logic into first-order logic with spatial
conjunction. These embeddings show that the satisfiability of formulas in
first-order logic with spatial conjunction is equivalent to the satisfiability
of formulas in second-order logic. These results explain the great expressive
power of spatial conjunction and can be used to show that adding unrestricted
spatial conjunction to a decidable logic leads to an undecidable logic. As one
example, we show that adding unrestricted spatial conjunction to two-variable
logic leads to undecidability. On the side of decidability, the embedding into
second-order logic immediately implies the decidability of first-order logic
with a form of spatial conjunction over trees. The embedding into spatial
conjunction also has useful consequences: because a restricted form of spatial
conjunction in two-variable logic preserves decidability, we obtain that a
correspondingly restricted form of second-order quantification in two-variable
logic is decidable. The resulting language generalizes the first-order theory
of boolean algebra over sets and is useful in reasoning about the contents of
data structures in object-oriented languages.Comment: 16 page
Algebraic foundations for qualitative calculi and networks
A qualitative representation is like an ordinary representation of a
relation algebra, but instead of requiring , as
we do for ordinary representations, we only require that , for each in the algebra. A constraint
network is qualitatively satisfiable if its nodes can be mapped to elements of
a qualitative representation, preserving the constraints. If a constraint
network is satisfiable then it is clearly qualitatively satisfiable, but the
converse can fail. However, for a wide range of relation algebras including the
point algebra, the Allen Interval Algebra, RCC8 and many others, a network is
satisfiable if and only if it is qualitatively satisfiable.
Unlike ordinary composition, the weak composition arising from qualitative
representations need not be associative, so we can generalise by considering
network satisfaction problems over non-associative algebras. We prove that
computationally, qualitative representations have many advantages over ordinary
representations: whereas many finite relation algebras have only infinite
representations, every finite qualitatively representable algebra has a finite
qualitative representation; the representability problem for (the atom
structures of) finite non-associative algebras is NP-complete; the network
satisfaction problem over a finite qualitatively representable algebra is
always in NP; the validity of equations over qualitative representations is
co-NP-complete. On the other hand we prove that there is no finite
axiomatisation of the class of qualitatively representable algebras.Comment: 22 page
- β¦