Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationHearing aids suffer from the problem of acoustic feedback that limits the gain provided by hearing aids. Moreover, the output sound quality of hearing aids may be compromised in the presence of background acoustic noise. Digital hearing aids use advanced signal processing to reduce acoustic feedback and background noise to improve the output sound quality. However, it is known that the output sound quality of digital hearing aids deteriorates as the hearing aid gain is increased. Furthermore, popular subband or transform domain digital signal processing in modern hearing aids introduces analysis-synthesis delays in the forward path. Long forward-path delays are not desirable because the processed sound combines with the unprocessed sound that arrives at the cochlea through the vent and changes the sound quality. In this dissertation, we employ a variable, frequency-dependent gain function that is lower at frequencies of the incoming signal where the information is perceptually insignificant. In addition, the method of this dissertation automatically identifies and suppresses residual acoustical feedback components at frequencies that have the potential to drive the system to instability. The suppressed frequency components are monitored and the suppression is removed when such frequencies no longer pose a threat to drive the hearing aid system into instability. Together, the method of this dissertation provides more stable gain over traditional methods by reducing acoustical coupling between the microphone and the loudspeaker of a hearing aid. In addition, the method of this dissertation performs necessary hearing aid signal processing with low-delay characteristics. The central idea for the low-delay hearing aid signal processing is a spectral gain shaping method (SGSM) that employs parallel parametric equalization (EQ) filters. Parameters of the parametric EQ filters and associated gain values are selected using a least-squares approach to obtain the desired spectral response. Finally, the method of this dissertation switches to a least-squares adaptation scheme with linear complexity at the onset of howling. The method adapts to the altered feedback path quickly and allows the patient to not lose perceivable information. The complexity of the least-squares estimate is reduced by reformulating the least-squares estimate into a Toeplitz system and solving it with a direct Toeplitz solver. The increase in stable gain over traditional methods and the output sound quality were evaluated with psychoacoustic experiments on normal-hearing listeners with speech and music signals. The results indicate that the method of this dissertation provides 8 to 12 dB more hearing aid gain than feedback cancelers with traditional fixed gain functions. Furthermore, experimental results obtained with real world hearing aid gain profiles indicate that the method of this dissertation provides less distortion in the output sound quality than classical feedback cancelers, enabling the use of more comfortable style hearing aids for patients with moderate to profound hearing loss. Extensive MATLAB simulations and subjective evaluations of the results indicate that the method of this dissertation exhibits much smaller forward-path delays with superior howling suppression capability

Evaluation of frequency modulation in reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids

Thesis (M.Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1997.Includes bibliographical references (leaf 47).by Kinuko Masaki.M.Eng

Effects of sound-induced hearing loss and hearing AIDS on the perception of music

This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from the Audio Engineering Society via https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0081Exposure to high-level music produces several physiological changes in the auditory system that lead to a variety of perceptual effects. Damage to the outer hair cells within the cochlea leads to a loss of sensitivity to weak sounds, loudness recruitment (a more rapid than normal growth of loudness with increasing sound level) and reduced frequency selectivity. Damage to inner hair cells and/or synapses leads to degeneration of neurons in the auditory nerve and to a reduced flow of information to the brain. This leads to poorer auditory discrimination and may contribute to reduced sensitivity to the temporal fine structure of sounds and to poor pitch perception. Hearing aids compensate for the effects of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment via multi-channel amplitude compression, but they do not compensate for reduced frequency selectivity or loss of inner hair cells/synapses/neurons. Multi-channel compression can impair some aspects of the perception of music, such as the ability to hear out one instrument or voice from a mixture. The limited frequency range and irregular frequency response of most hearing aids is associated with poor sound quality for music. Finally, systems for reducing acoustic feedback can have undesirable side effects when listening to music.This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (UK, grant number G0701870), Action on Hearing Loss, Phonak, and Starkey

The effectiveness of traditional methods and altered auditory feedback in improving speech rate and intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson's disease

Communication problems are a frequent symptom for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) which can have a significant impact on their quality-of-life. Deciding on the right management approach can be problematic though, as, with the exception of LSVT (R), very few studies have been published demonstrating the effectiveness of treatment techniques. The aim of this study was to compare traditional rate reduction methods with altered auditory feedback (AAF) with respect to their effectiveness to reduce speech rate and improve intelligibility in speakers with PD. Ten participants underwent both types of treatments in once weekly sessions for 6 weeks. Outcomes measures were speech rate for passage reading as well as intelligibility on both a passage reading and a monologue task. The results showed that, as a group, there was no significant change in either speech rate or intelligibility resulting from either treatment type. However, individual speakers showed improvements in speech performance as a result of each therapy technique. In most cases, these benefits persisted for at least 6 months post-treatment. Possible reasons for the variable response to treatment, as well as issues to consider when planning to use AAF devices in treatment are discussed

Control of feedback for assistive listening devices

Acoustic feedback refers to the undesired acoustic coupling between the loudspeaker and microphone in hearing aids. This feedback channel poses limitations to the normal operation of hearing aids under varying acoustic scenarios. This work makes contributions to improve the performance of adaptive feedback cancellation techniques and speech quality in hearing aids. For this purpose a two microphone approach is proposed and analysed; and probe signal injection methods are also investigated and improved upon

Adaptive gain processing with offending frequency suppression for digital hearing aids

Journal ArticleDigital hearing aids identify acoustic feedback signals and cancel them continuously in a closed loop with an adaptive filter. This scheme facilitates larger hearing aid gain and improves the output sound quality of hearing aids. However, the output sound quality deteriorates as the hearing aid gain is increased. This paper presents two methods to modify the forward path gain in digital hearing aids. The first approach employs a variable, frequency-dependent gain function that is lower at frequencies of the incoming signal where the information is perceptually insignificant. The second method of this paper automatically identifies and suppresses residual acoustical feedback components at frequencies that have the potential to drive the system to instability. The suppressed frequency components are monitored and the suppression is removed when such frequencies no longer pose a threat to drive the hearing aid system into instability. Together, the gain processing methods of this paper provide 8 to 12 dB more hearing aid gain than feedback cancelers with fixed gain functions. Furthermore, experimental results obtained with real world hearing aid gain profiles indicate that the gain processing methods of this paper, individually and combined, provide less distortion in the output sound quality than classical feedback cancelers enabling the use of more comfortable style hearing aids for patients with moderate to profound hearing loss