33,605 research outputs found
Approximation Bounds For Minimum Degree Matching
We consider the MINGREEDY strategy for Maximum Cardinality Matching.
MINGREEDY repeatedly selects an edge incident with a node of minimum degree.
For graphs of degree at most we show that MINGREEDY achieves
approximation ratio at least in the worst case
and that this performance is optimal among adaptive priority algorithms in the
vertex model, which include many prominent greedy matching heuristics. Even
when considering expected approximation ratios of randomized greedy strategies,
no better worst case bounds are known for graphs of small degrees.Comment: % CHANGELOG % rev 1 2014-12-02 % - Show that the class APV contains
many prominent greedy matching algorithms. % - Adapt inapproximability bound
for APV-algorithms to a priori knowledge on |V|. % rev 2 2015-10-31 % -
improve performance guarantee of MINGREEDY to be tigh
Relaxed Schedulers Can Efficiently Parallelize Iterative Algorithms
There has been significant progress in understanding the parallelism inherent
to iterative sequential algorithms: for many classic algorithms, the depth of
the dependence structure is now well understood, and scheduling techniques have
been developed to exploit this shallow dependence structure for efficient
parallel implementations. A related, applied research strand has studied
methods by which certain iterative task-based algorithms can be efficiently
parallelized via relaxed concurrent priority schedulers. These allow for high
concurrency when inserting and removing tasks, at the cost of executing
superfluous work due to the relaxed semantics of the scheduler.
In this work, we take a step towards unifying these two research directions,
by showing that there exists a family of relaxed priority schedulers that can
efficiently and deterministically execute classic iterative algorithms such as
greedy maximal independent set (MIS) and matching. Our primary result shows
that, given a randomized scheduler with an expected relaxation factor of in
terms of the maximum allowed priority inversions on a task, and any graph on
vertices, the scheduler is able to execute greedy MIS with only an additive
factor of poly() expected additional iterations compared to an exact (but
not scalable) scheduler. This counter-intuitive result demonstrates that the
overhead of relaxation when computing MIS is not dependent on the input size or
structure of the input graph. Experimental results show that this overhead can
be clearly offset by the gain in performance due to the highly scalable
scheduler. In sum, we present an efficient method to deterministically
parallelize iterative sequential algorithms, with provable runtime guarantees
in terms of the number of executed tasks to completion.Comment: PODC 2018, pages 377-386 in proceeding
On Conceptually Simple Algorithms for Variants of Online Bipartite Matching
We present a series of results regarding conceptually simple algorithms for
bipartite matching in various online and related models. We first consider a
deterministic adversarial model. The best approximation ratio possible for a
one-pass deterministic online algorithm is , which is achieved by any
greedy algorithm. D\"urr et al. recently presented a -pass algorithm called
Category-Advice that achieves approximation ratio . We extend their
algorithm to multiple passes. We prove the exact approximation ratio for the
-pass Category-Advice algorithm for all , and show that the
approximation ratio converges to the inverse of the golden ratio
as goes to infinity. The convergence is
extremely fast --- the -pass Category-Advice algorithm is already within
of the inverse of the golden ratio.
We then consider a natural greedy algorithm in the online stochastic IID
model---MinDegree. This algorithm is an online version of a well-known and
extensively studied offline algorithm MinGreedy. We show that MinDegree cannot
achieve an approximation ratio better than , which is guaranteed by any
consistent greedy algorithm in the known IID model.
Finally, following the work in Besser and Poloczek, we depart from an
adversarial or stochastic ordering and investigate a natural randomized
algorithm (MinRanking) in the priority model. Although the priority model
allows the algorithm to choose the input ordering in a general but well defined
way, this natural algorithm cannot obtain the approximation of the Ranking
algorithm in the ROM model
Uplift Modeling with Multiple Treatments and General Response Types
Randomized experiments have been used to assist decision-making in many
areas. They help people select the optimal treatment for the test population
with certain statistical guarantee. However, subjects can show significant
heterogeneity in response to treatments. The problem of customizing treatment
assignment based on subject characteristics is known as uplift modeling,
differential response analysis, or personalized treatment learning in
literature. A key feature for uplift modeling is that the data is unlabeled. It
is impossible to know whether the chosen treatment is optimal for an individual
subject because response under alternative treatments is unobserved. This
presents a challenge to both the training and the evaluation of uplift models.
In this paper we describe how to obtain an unbiased estimate of the key
performance metric of an uplift model, the expected response. We present a new
uplift algorithm which creates a forest of randomized trees. The trees are
built with a splitting criterion designed to directly optimize their uplift
performance based on the proposed evaluation method. Both the evaluation method
and the algorithm apply to arbitrary number of treatments and general response
types. Experimental results on synthetic data and industry-provided data show
that our algorithm leads to significant performance improvement over other
applicable methods
- β¦