1,619 research outputs found
Quantum Information and the PCP Theorem
We show how to encode (classical) bits by a single
quantum state of size O(n) qubits, such that: for any constant and
any , the values of the bits
can be retrieved from by a one-round
Arthur-Merlin interactive protocol of size polynomial in . This shows how to
go around Holevo-Nayak's Theorem, using Arthur-Merlin proofs.
We use the new representation to prove the following results:
1) Interactive proofs with quantum advice: We show that the class
contains ALL languages. That is, for any language (even non-recursive), the
membership (for of length ) can be proved by a polynomial-size
quantum interactive proof, where the verifier is a polynomial-size quantum
circuit with working space initiated with some quantum state
(depending only on and ). Moreover, the interactive proof that we give
is of only one round, and the messages communicated are classical.
2) PCP with only one query: We show that the membership (for
of length ) can be proved by a logarithmic-size quantum state ,
together with a polynomial-size classical proof consisting of blocks of length
bits each, such that after measuring the state the
verifier only needs to read {\bf one} block of the classical proof.
While the first result is a straight forward consequence of the new
representation, the second requires an additional machinery of quantum
low-degree-test that may be interesting in its own right.Comment: 30 page
The Quantum PCP Conjecture
The classical PCP theorem is arguably the most important achievement of
classical complexity theory in the past quarter century. In recent years,
researchers in quantum computational complexity have tried to identify
approaches and develop tools that address the question: does a quantum version
of the PCP theorem hold? The story of this study starts with classical
complexity and takes unexpected turns providing fascinating vistas on the
foundations of quantum mechanics, the global nature of entanglement and its
topological properties, quantum error correction, information theory, and much
more; it raises questions that touch upon some of the most fundamental issues
at the heart of our understanding of quantum mechanics. At this point, the jury
is still out as to whether or not such a theorem holds. This survey aims to
provide a snapshot of the status in this ongoing story, tailored to a general
theory-of-CS audience.Comment: 45 pages, 4 figures, an enhanced version of the SIGACT guest column
from Volume 44 Issue 2, June 201
Guest Column: The Quantum PCP Conjecture
The classical PCP theorem is arguably the most important achievement of classical complexity theory in the past quarter century. In recent years, researchers in quantum computational complexity have tried to identify approaches and develop tools that address the question: does a quantum version of the PCP theorem hold? The story of this study starts with classical complexity and takes unexpected turns providing fascinating vistas on the foundations of quantum mechanics and multipartite entanglement, topology and the so-called phenomenon of topological order, quantum error correction, information theory, and much more; it raises questions that touch upon some of the most fundamental issues at the heart of our understanding of quantum mechanics. At this point, the jury is still out as to whether or not such a theorem holds. This survey aims to provide a snapshot of the status in this ongoing story, tailored to a general theory-of-CS audience
Commitments to Quantum States
What does it mean to commit to a quantum state? In this work, we propose a
simple answer: a commitment to quantum messages is binding if, after the commit
phase, the committed state is hidden from the sender's view. We accompany this
new definition with several instantiations. We build the first non-interactive
succinct quantum state commitments, which can be seen as an analogue of
collision-resistant hashing for quantum messages. We also show that hiding
quantum state commitments (QSCs) are implied by any commitment scheme for
classical messages. All of our constructions can be based on
quantum-cryptographic assumptions that are implied by but are potentially
weaker than one-way functions.
Commitments to quantum states open the door to many new cryptographic
possibilities. Our flagship application of a succinct QSC is a
quantum-communication version of Kilian's succinct arguments for any language
that has quantum PCPs with constant error and polylogarithmic locality.
Plugging in the PCP theorem, this yields succinct arguments for NP under
significantly weaker assumptions than required classically; moreover, if the
quantum PCP conjecture holds, this extends to QMA. At the heart of our security
proof is a new rewinding technique for extracting quantum information
Constant-Soundness Interactive Proofs for Local Hamiltonians
We give a quantum multiprover interactive proof
system for the local Hamiltonian problem in which there is a constant number of
provers, questions are classical of length polynomial in the number of qubits,
and answers are of constant length. The main novelty of our protocol is that
the gap between completeness and soundness is directly proportional to the
promise gap on the (normalized) ground state energy of the Hamiltonian. This
result can be interpreted as a concrete step towards a quantum PCP theorem
giving entangled-prover interactive proof systems for QMA-complete problems.
The key ingredient is a quantum version of the classical linearity test of
Blum, Luby, and Rubinfeld, where the function is
replaced by a pair of functions \Xlin, \Zlin:\{0,1\}^n\to \text{Obs}_d(\C),
the set of -dimensional Hermitian matrices that square to identity. The test
enforces that (i) each function is exactly linear,
\Xlin(a)\Xlin(b)=\Xlin(a+b) and \Zlin(a) \Zlin(b)=\Zlin(a+b), and (ii) the
two functions are approximately complementary, \Xlin(a)\Zlin(b)\approx
(-1)^{a\cdot b} \Zlin(b)\Xlin(a).Comment: 33 page
- …