Speaker Recognition in Content-based Image Retrieval for a High Degree of Accuracy

The purpose of this research is to measure the speaker recognition accuracy in Content-Based Image Retrieval. To support research in speaker recognition accuracy, we use two approaches for recognition system: identification and verification, an identification using fuzzy Mamdani, a verification using Manhattan distance. The test results in this research. The best of distance mean is size 32x32. The best of the verification for distance rate is 965, and the speaker recognition system has a standard error of 5% and the system accuracy is 95%. From these results, we find that there is an increase in accuracy of almost 2.5%. This is due to a combination of two approaches so the system can add to the accuracy of speaker recognition

Comparative Study And Analysis Of Quality Based Multibiometric Technique Using Fuzzy Inference System

Biometric is a science and technology of measuring and analyzing biological data i.e. physical or behavioral traits which is able to uniquely recognize a person from others. Prior studies of biometric verification systems with fusion of several biometric sources have been proved to be outstanding over single biometric system. However, fusion approach without considering the quality information of the data used will affect the system performance where in some cases the performances of the fusion system may become worse compared to the performances of either one of the single systems. In order to overcome this limitation, this study proposes a quality based fusion scheme by designing a fuzzy inference system (FIS) which is able to determine the optimum weight to combine the parameter for fusion systems in changing conditions. For this purpose, fusion systems which combine two modalities i.e. speech and lip traits are experimented. For speech signal, Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) is used as features while region of interest (ROI) of lip image is employed as lip features. Support vector machine (SVM) is then executed as classifier to the verification system. For validation, common fusion schemes i.e. minimum rule, maximum rule, simple sum rule, weighted sum rule are compared to the proposed quality based fusion scheme. From the experimental results at 35dB SNR of speech and 0.8 quality density of lip, the EER percentages for speech, lip, minimum rule, maximum rule, simple sum rule, weighted sum rule systems are observed as 5.9210%, 37.2157%, 33.2676%, 31.1364%, 4.0112% and 14.9023%, respectively compared to the performances of sugeno-type FIS and mamdani-type FIS i.e. 1.9974% and 1.9745%

Multimodal biometric authentication based on voice, fingerprint and face recognition

openNew decison module to combine the score of voice, fingerprint and face recognition in a multimodal biometric system.New decison module to combine the score of voice, fingerprint and face recognition in a multimodal biometric system

Decision fusion for multi-modal person authentication.

Hui Pak Sum Henry.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006.Includes bibliographical references (leaves [147]-152).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Chapter 1. --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1. --- Objectives --- p.4Chapter 1.2. --- Thesis Outline --- p.5Chapter 2. --- Background --- p.6Chapter 2.1. --- User Authentication Systems --- p.6Chapter 2.2. --- Biometric Authentication --- p.9Chapter 2.2.1. --- Speaker Verification System --- p.9Chapter 2.2.2. --- Face Verification System --- p.10Chapter 2.2.3. --- Fingerprint Verification System --- p.11Chapter 2.3. --- Verbal Information Verification (VIV) --- p.12Chapter 2.4. --- Combining SV and VIV --- p.15Chapter 2.5. --- Biometric Decision Fusion Techniques --- p.17Chapter 2.6. --- Fuzzy Logic --- p.20Chapter 2.6.1. --- Fuzzy Membership Function and Fuzzy Set --- p.21Chapter 2.6.2. --- Fuzzy Operators --- p.22Chapter 2.6.3. --- Fuzzy Rules --- p.22Chapter 2.6.4. --- Defuzzification --- p.23Chapter 2.6.5. --- Advantage of Using Fuzzy Logic in Biometric Fusion --- p.23Chapter 2.7. --- Chapter Summary --- p.25Chapter 3. --- Experimental Data --- p.26Chapter 3.1. --- Data for Multi-biometric Fusion --- p.26Chapter 3.1.1. --- Speech Utterances --- p.30Chapter 3.1.2. --- Face Movement Video Frames --- p.31Chapter 3.1.3. --- Fingerprint Images --- p.32Chapter 3.2. --- Data for Speech Authentication Fusion --- p.33Chapter 3.2.1. --- SV Training Data for Speaker Model --- p.34Chapter 3.2.2. --- VIV Training Data for Speaker Independent Model --- p.34Chapter 3.2.3. --- Validation Data --- p.34Chapter 3.3. --- Chapter Summary --- p.36Chapter 4. --- Authentication Modules --- p.37Chapter 4.1. --- Biometric Authentication --- p.38Chapter 4.1.1. --- Speaker Verification --- p.38Chapter 4.1.2. --- Face Verification --- p.38Chapter 4.1.3. --- Fingerprint Verification --- p.39Chapter 4.1.4. --- Individual Biometric Performance --- p.39Chapter 4.2. --- Verbal Information Verification (VIV) --- p.42Chapter 4.3. --- Chapter Summary --- p.44Chapter 5. --- Weighted Average Fusion for Multi-Modal Biometrics --- p.46Chapter 5.1. --- Experimental Setup and Results --- p.46Chapter 5.2. --- Analysis of Weighted Average Fusion Results --- p.48Chapter 5.3. --- Chapter Summary --- p.59Chapter 6. --- Fully Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Decision Fusion Framework --- p.61Chapter 6.1. --- Factors Considered in the Estimation of Biometric Sample Quality --- p.62Chapter 6.1.1. --- Factors for Speech --- p.63Chapter 6.1.2. --- Factors for Face --- p.65Chapter 6.1.3. --- Factors for Fingerprint --- p.70Chapter 6.2. --- Fuzzy Logic Decision Fusion Framework --- p.76Chapter 6.2.1. --- Speech Fuzzy Sets --- p.77Chapter 6.2.2. --- Face Fuzzy Sets --- p.79Chapter 6.2.3. --- Fingerprint Fuzzy Sets --- p.80Chapter 6.2.4. --- Output Fuzzy Sets --- p.81Chapter 6.2.5. --- Fuzzy Rules and Other Information --- p.83Chapter 6.3. --- Experimental Setup and Results --- p.84Chapter 6.4. --- Comparison Between Weighted Average and Fuzzy Logic Decision Fusion --- p.86Chapter 6.5. --- Chapter Summary --- p.95Chapter 7. --- Factors Affecting VIV Performance --- p.97Chapter 7.1. --- Factors from Verbal Messages --- p.99Chapter 7.1.1. --- Number of Distinct-Unique Responses --- p.99Chapter 7.1.2. --- Distribution of Distinct-Unique Responses --- p.101Chapter 7.1.3. --- Inter-person Lexical Choice Variations --- p.103Chapter 7.1.4. --- Intra-person Lexical Choice Variations --- p.106Chapter 7.2. --- Factors from Utterance Verification --- p.108Chapter 7.2.1. --- Thresholding --- p.109Chapter 7.2.2. --- Background Noise --- p.113Chapter 7.3. --- VIV Weight Estimation Using PDP --- p.115Chapter 7.4. --- Chapter Summary --- p.119Chapter 8. --- Adaptive Fusion for SV and VIV --- p.121Chapter 8.1. --- Weighted Average fusion of SV and VIV --- p.122Chapter 8.1.1. --- Scores Normalization --- p.123Chapter 8.1.2. --- Experimental Setup --- p.123Chapter 8.2. --- Adaptive Fusion for SV and VIV --- p.124Chapter 8.2.1. --- Components of Adaptive Fusion --- p.126Chapter 8.2.2. --- Three Categories Design --- p.129Chapter 8.2.3. --- Fusion Strategy for Each Category --- p.132Chapter 8.2.4. --- SV Driven Approach --- p.133Chapter 8.3. --- SV and Fixed-Pass Phrase VIV Fusion Results --- p.133Chapter 8.4. --- SV and Key-Pass Phrase VIV Fusion Results --- p.136Chapter 8.5. --- Chapter Summary --- p.141Chapter 9. --- Conclusions and Future Work --- p.143Chapter 9.1. --- Conclusions --- p.143Chapter 9.2. --- Future Work --- p.145Bibliography --- p.147Appendix A Detail of BSC Speech --- p.153Appendix B Fuzzy Rules for Multimodal Biometric Fusion --- p.155Appendix C Full Example for Multimodal Biometrics Fusion --- p.157Appendix DReason for Having a Flat Error Surface --- p.161Appendix E Reason for Having a Relative Peak Point in the Middle of the Error Surface --- p.164Appendix F Illustration on Fuzzy Logic Weight Estimation --- p.166Appendix GExamples for SV and Key-Pass Phrase VIV Fusion --- p.17

Speaker Recognition in Content-based Image Retrieval for a High Degree of Accuracy

The purpose of this research is to measure the speaker recognition accuracy in Content-Based Image Retrieval. To support research in speaker recognition accuracy, we use two approaches for recognition system: identification and verification, an identification using fuzzy Mamdani, a verification using Manhattan distance. The test results in this research. The best of distance mean is size 32x32. The best of the verification for distance rate is 965, and the speaker recognition system has a standard error of 5% and the system accuracy is 95%. From these results, we find that there is an increase in accuracy of almost 2.5%. This is due to a combination of two approaches so the system can add to the accuracy of speaker recognitio

Multibiometric security in wireless communication systems

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University, 05/08/2010.This thesis has aimed to explore an application of Multibiometrics to secured wireless communications. The medium of study for this purpose included Wi-Fi, 3G, and WiMAX, over which simulations and experimental studies were carried out to assess the performance. In specific, restriction of access to authorized users only is provided by a technique referred to hereafter as multibiometric cryptosystem. In brief, the system is built upon a complete challenge/response methodology in order to obtain a high level of security on the basis of user identification by fingerprint and further confirmation by verification of the user through text-dependent speaker recognition. First is the enrolment phase by which the database of watermarked fingerprints with memorable texts along with the voice features, based on the same texts, is created by sending them to the server through wireless channel. Later is the verification stage at which claimed users, ones who claim are genuine, are verified against the database, and it consists of five steps. Initially faced by the identification level, one is asked to first present one’s fingerprint and a memorable word, former is watermarked into latter, in order for system to authenticate the fingerprint and verify the validity of it by retrieving the challenge for accepted user. The following three steps then involve speaker recognition including the user responding to the challenge by text-dependent voice, server authenticating the response, and finally server accepting/rejecting the user. In order to implement fingerprint watermarking, i.e. incorporating the memorable word as a watermark message into the fingerprint image, an algorithm of five steps has been developed. The first three novel steps having to do with the fingerprint image enhancement (CLAHE with 'Clip Limit', standard deviation analysis and sliding neighborhood) have been followed with further two steps for embedding, and extracting the watermark into the enhanced fingerprint image utilising Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). In the speaker recognition stage, the limitations of this technique in wireless communication have been addressed by sending voice feature (cepstral coefficients) instead of raw sample. This scheme is to reap the advantages of reducing the transmission time and dependency of the data on communication channel, together with no loss of packet. Finally, the obtained results have verified the claims

Strategies for exploiting independent cloud implementations of biometric experts in multibiometric scenarios

Cloud computing represents one of the fastest growing areas of technology and offers a new computing model for various applications and services. This model is particularly interesting for the area of biometric recognition, where scalability, processing power and storage requirements are becoming a bigger and bigger issue with each new generation of recognition technology. Next to the availability of computing resources, another important aspect of cloud computing with respect to biometrics is accessability. Since biometric cloud-services are easily accessible, it is possible to combine different existing implementations and design new multi-biometric services that next to almost unlimited resources also offer superior recognition performance and, consequently, ensure improved security to its client applications. Unfortunately, the literature on the best strategies of how to combine existing implementations of cloud-based biometric experts into a multi-biometric service is virtually non-existent. In this paper we try to close this gap and evaluate different strategies for combining existing biometric experts into a multi-biometric cloud-service. We analyze the (fusion) strategies from different perspectives such as performance gains, training complexity or resource consumption and present results and findings important to software developers and other researchers working in the areas of biometrics and cloud computing. The analysis is conducted based on two biometric cloud-services, which are also presented in the paper