Pushing the envelope of Optimization Modulo Theories with Linear-Arithmetic Cost Functions

In the last decade we have witnessed an impressive progress in the expressiveness and efficiency of Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solving techniques. This has brought previously-intractable problems at the reach of state-of-the-art SMT solvers, in particular in the domain of SW and HW verification. Many SMT-encodable problems of interest, however, require also the capability of finding models that are optimal wrt. some cost functions. In previous work, namely "Optimization Modulo Theory with Linear Rational Cost Functions -- OMT(LAR U T )", we have leveraged SMT solving to handle the minimization of cost functions on linear arithmetic over the rationals, by means of a combination of SMT and LP minimization techniques. In this paper we push the envelope of our OMT approach along three directions: first, we extend it to work also with linear arithmetic on the mixed integer/rational domain, by means of a combination of SMT, LP and ILP minimization techniques; second, we develop a multi-objective version of OMT, so that to handle many cost functions simultaneously; third, we develop an incremental version of OMT, so that to exploit the incrementality of some OMT-encodable problems. An empirical evaluation performed on OMT-encoded verification problems demonstrates the usefulness and efficiency of these extensions.Comment: A slightly-shorter version of this paper is published at TACAS 2015 conferenc

On Optimization Modulo Theories, MaxSMT and Sorting Networks

Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) is an extension of SMT which allows for finding models that optimize given objectives. (Partial weighted) MaxSMT --or equivalently OMT with Pseudo-Boolean objective functions, OMT+PB-- is a very-relevant strict subcase of OMT. We classify existing approaches for MaxSMT or OMT+PB in two groups: MaxSAT-based approaches exploit the efficiency of state-of-the-art MAXSAT solvers, but they are specific-purpose and not always applicable; OMT-based approaches are general-purpose, but they suffer from intrinsic inefficiencies on MaxSMT/OMT+PB problems. We identify a major source of such inefficiencies, and we address it by enhancing OMT by means of bidirectional sorting networks. We implemented this idea on top of the OptiMathSAT OMT solver. We run an extensive empirical evaluation on a variety of problems, comparing MaxSAT-based and OMT-based techniques, with and without sorting networks, implemented on top of OptiMathSAT and {\nu}Z. The results support the effectiveness of this idea, and provide interesting insights about the different approaches.Comment: 17 pages, submitted at Tacas 1

Optimal Planning Modulo Theories

Planning for real-world applications requires algorithms and tools with the ability to handle the complexity such scenarios entail. However, meeting the needs of such applications poses substantial challenges, both representational and algorithmic. On the one hand, expressive languages are needed to build faithful models. On the other hand, efficient solving techniques that can support these languages need to be devised. A response to this challenge is underway, and the past few years witnessed a community effort towards more expressive languages, including decidable fragments of first-order theories. In this work we focus on planning with arithmetic theories and propose Optimal Planning Modulo Theories, a framework that attempts to provide efficient means of dealing with such problems. Leveraging generic Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) solvers, we first present domain-specific encodings for optimal planning in complex logistic domains. We then present a more general, domain- independent formulation that allows to extend OMT planning to a broader class of well-studied numeric problems in planning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time OMT procedures are employed in domain-independent planning

Compact Representation of Time-Index Job Shop Problems Using a Bit-Vector Formulation

The Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSP) is a combinatorial optimization problem where jobs visit single-capacity machines while minimizing a cost function, typically the makespan. The problem can be extended to fit typical industrial scenarios such as flexible assembly shop floors or for coordinating fleets of automated vehicles. General purpose optimizers can handle extended versions of the problem that typically arise in industrial problems. Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) solvers and recently optimizing Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers can be used as general solvers for JSP problems. There exist different formulations of JSP problems, among them the time-index (TI) model. The TI offers the advantage of providing strong lower bounds, though its drawback is the model size.In this paper we present a new formulation of the TI model suitable for optimizing SMT-solvers that support bit-vector theories. The new formulation is significantly more compact than the standard TI formulation and is thus reducing one of the major issues with the TI model.We benchmark two different optimizing SMT solvers supporting bit-vector theories, comparing the standard formulation of the TI to the new formulation on a set of benchmark instances. The computational analysis shows that the new formulation outperforms the standard one, being up to twice faster and regardless of the solver employed; moreover the model generated with the new formulation is considerably smaller than with the standard formulation

Artificial Intelligence for Automated Design of Elevator Systems

Configuration and design of complex products represents a challenge in many application fields. The designer must take into account many different aspects and make decisions typically driven by experience while taking into account performance constraints and costs. Methods and tools for design automation represents a viable solution to such complex decision problems, giving also the possibility to optimize the performance of the final product on particular context-driven aspects. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can help in dealing with complexity and enhance the current tools by supplying solutions in feasible time. My research is concerned with the development and testing of different artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automate the design of elevators. Elevator design is a problem with many interesting aspects like the need to deal with a hybrid search state space (continuous and discrete variables) constrained by design requirements and safety regulations. The study, design and integration of AI techniques in this particular application field can provide the end user with design automation tools that output feasible solutions within acceptable computation times. My research considered AI techniques such as special-purpose heuristic search, genetic algorithms and constraint satisfaction to solve elevator configuration problems. I tested them considering different setups and parts of the whole design process. I have also implemented a tool L IFT C REATE , available as a web application. L IFT C REATE leverages the findings of my research to automate the design of elevators and, to the best of my knowledge, there is currently no similar tool publicly available from either academia or industry that provides the same level of design automation

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas