1,130 research outputs found
Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games: Existence, Efficient Computation, and Structure
We consider structural and algorithmic questions related to the Nash dynamics
of weighted congestion games. In weighted congestion games with linear latency
functions, the existence of (pure Nash) equilibria is guaranteed by potential
function arguments. Unfortunately, this proof of existence is inefficient and
computing equilibria is such games is a {\sf PLS}-hard problem. The situation
gets worse when superlinear latency functions come into play; in this case, the
Nash dynamics of the game may contain cycles and equilibria may not even exist.
Given these obstacles, we consider approximate equilibria as alternative
solution concepts. Do such equilibria exist? And if so, can we compute them
efficiently?
We provide positive answers to both questions for weighted congestion games
with polynomial latency functions by exploiting an "approximation" of such
games by a new class of potential games that we call -games. This allows
us to show that these games have -approximate equilibria, where is the
maximum degree of the latency functions. Our main technical contribution is an
efficient algorithm for computing O(1)-approximate equilibria when is a
constant. For games with linear latency functions, the approximation guarantee
is for arbitrarily small ; for
latency functions with maximum degree , it is . The
running time is polynomial in the number of bits in the representation of the
game and . As a byproduct of our techniques, we also show the
following structural statement for weighted congestion games with polynomial
latency functions of maximum degree : polynomially-long sequences of
best-response moves from any initial state to a -approximate
equilibrium exist and can be efficiently identified in such games as long as
is constant.Comment: 31 page
On Existence and Properties of Approximate Pure Nash Equilibria in Bandwidth Allocation Games
In \emph{bandwidth allocation games} (BAGs), the strategy of a player
consists of various demands on different resources. The player's utility is at
most the sum of these demands, provided they are fully satisfied. Every
resource has a limited capacity and if it is exceeded by the total demand, it
has to be split between the players. Since these games generally do not have
pure Nash equilibria, we consider approximate pure Nash equilibria, in which no
player can improve her utility by more than some fixed factor through
unilateral strategy changes. There is a threshold (where
is a parameter that limits the demand of each player on a specific
resource) such that -approximate pure Nash equilibria always exist for
, but not for . We give both
upper and lower bounds on this threshold and show that the
corresponding decision problem is -hard. We also show that the
-approximate price of anarchy for BAGs is . For a restricted
version of the game, where demands of players only differ slightly from each
other (e.g. symmetric games), we show that approximate Nash equilibria can be
reached (and thus also be computed) in polynomial time using the best-response
dynamic. Finally, we show that a broader class of utility-maximization games
(which includes BAGs) converges quickly towards states whose social welfare is
close to the optimum
Resource Competition on Integral Polymatroids
We study competitive resource allocation problems in which players distribute
their demands integrally on a set of resources subject to player-specific
submodular capacity constraints. Each player has to pay for each unit of demand
a cost that is a nondecreasing and convex function of the total allocation of
that resource. This general model of resource allocation generalizes both
singleton congestion games with integer-splittable demands and matroid
congestion games with player-specific costs. As our main result, we show that
in such general resource allocation problems a pure Nash equilibrium is
guaranteed to exist by giving a pseudo-polynomial algorithm computing a pure
Nash equilibrium.Comment: 17 page
Joint strategy fictitious play with inertia for potential games
We consider multi-player repeated games involving a large number of players with large strategy spaces and enmeshed utility structures. In these ldquolarge-scalerdquo games, players are inherently faced with limitations in both their observational and computational capabilities. Accordingly, players in large-scale games need to make their decisions using algorithms that accommodate limitations in information gathering and processing. This disqualifies some of the well known decision making models such as ldquoFictitious Playrdquo (FP), in which each player must monitor the individual actions of every other player and must optimize over a high dimensional probability space. We will show that Joint Strategy Fictitious Play (JSFP), a close variant of FP, alleviates both the informational and computational burden of FP. Furthermore, we introduce JSFP with inertia, i.e., a probabilistic reluctance to change strategies, and establish the convergence to a pure Nash equilibrium in all generalized ordinal potential games in both cases of averaged or exponentially discounted historical data. We illustrate JSFP with inertia on the specific class of congestion games, a subset of generalized ordinal potential games. In particular, we illustrate the main results on a distributed traffic routing problem and derive tolling procedures that can lead to optimized total traffic congestion
Computing Approximate Equilibria in Weighted Congestion Games via Best-Responses
We present a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for computing
-approximate (pure) Nash equilibria in weighted congestion games
with polynomial cost functions of degree at most . This is an exponential
improvement of the approximation factor with respect to the previously best
deterministic algorithm. An appealing additional feature of our algorithm is
that it uses only best-improvement steps in the actual game, as opposed to
earlier approaches that first had to transform the game itself. Our algorithm
is an adaptation of the seminal algorithm by Caragiannis et al. [FOCS'11, TEAC
2015], but we utilize an approximate potential function directly on the
original game instead of an exact one on a modified game.
A critical component of our analysis, which is of independent interest, is
the derivation of a novel bound of for the
Price of Anarchy (PoA) of -approximate equilibria in weighted congestion
games, where is the Lambert-W function. More specifically, we
show that this PoA is exactly equal to , where
is the unique positive solution of the equation . Our upper bound is derived via a smoothness-like argument,
and thus holds even for mixed Nash and correlated equilibria, while our lower
bound is simple enough to apply even to singleton congestion games
Sharing Non-Anonymous Costs of Multiple Resources Optimally
In cost sharing games, the existence and efficiency of pure Nash equilibria
fundamentally depends on the method that is used to share the resources' costs.
We consider a general class of resource allocation problems in which a set of
resources is used by a heterogeneous set of selfish users. The cost of a
resource is a (non-decreasing) function of the set of its users. Under the
assumption that the costs of the resources are shared by uniform cost sharing
protocols, i.e., protocols that use only local information of the resource's
cost structure and its users to determine the cost shares, we exactly quantify
the inefficiency of the resulting pure Nash equilibria. Specifically, we show
tight bounds on prices of stability and anarchy for games with only submodular
and only supermodular cost functions, respectively, and an asymptotically tight
bound for games with arbitrary set-functions. While all our upper bounds are
attained for the well-known Shapley cost sharing protocol, our lower bounds
hold for arbitrary uniform cost sharing protocols and are even valid for games
with anonymous costs, i.e., games in which the cost of each resource only
depends on the cardinality of the set of its users
Network Topology and Equilibrium Existence in Weighted Network Congestion Games
Every finite noncooperative game can be presented as a weighted network congestion game, and also as a network congestion game with player-specific costs. In the first presentation, different players may contribute differently to congestion, and in the second, they are differently (negatively) affected by it. This paper shows that the topology of the underlying (undirected two-terminal) network provides information about the existence of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in the game. For some networks, but not for others, every corresponding game has at least one such equilibrium. For the weighted presentation, a complete characterization of the networks with this property is given. The necessary and sufficient condition is that the network has at most three routes that do traverse any edge in opposite directions, or it consists of several such networks connected in series. The corresponding problem for player-specific costs remains open.Congestion games, network topology, existence of equilibrium
Weighted Congestion Games With Separable Preferences
Players in a congestion game may differ from one another in their intrinsic preferences (e.g., the benefit they get from using a specific resource), their contribution to congestion, or both. In many cases of interest, intrinsic preferences and the negative effect of congestion are (additively or multiplicatively) separable. This paper considers the implications of separability for the existence of pure-strategy Nash equilibrium and the prospects of spontaneous convergence to equilibrium. It is shown that these properties may or may not be guaranteed, depending on the exact nature of player heterogeneity.congestion games, separable preferences, pure equilibrium, finite improvement property, potential.
- …