235,956 research outputs found
Accreditation of health services: is it money and time well spent?
The research evidence shows that accreditation is a useful tool for stimulating improvements in the quality and safety of health services.
Accreditation programs are deployed widely to monitor and promote safety and quality in healthcare. Governments, health service organisations and accreditation agencies have invested considerable resources into accreditation programs, but to date evidence of their effectiveness is limited and varied in some areas.
Without more robust evidence – on what aspects of accreditation programs work, in what contexts and why – policymakers will have to continue drawing on expert opinion, small-scale program evaluations and cautious comparative assessments of the literature when reviewing, revising or implementing accreditation programs
The Architecture of Accreditation
Accreditation systems can be analyzed in terms of the designer’s choices in three dimensions. One dimension is purpose of accreditation, where purpose may relate to program quality or quality of outcomes. The second dimension consists of types of accreditation norms used to achieve these purposes. There are five principal types of norms available in this dimension: process-quality norms, output norms, power allocation norms, self-determination norms, and consumer-protection norms. The third dimension consists of degree of regulation, which includes prescriptiveness or extensiveness of regulation. A sound accreditation system will make choices along each of these three dimensions. Understanding the range of possible structures helps one design, revise, and effectively analyze accreditation systems
ACR Accreditation for Utah Valley Hospital’s Radiation Oncology Center
Becoming an accredited clinic through the American College of Radiology (ACR) and their Radiation Oncology Practice Accreditation (ROPA) program will provide third-party evaluation of patient care to ensure the best treatment possible for patients.
Talk of getting ACR accreditation has occurred in the past for Utah Valley Hospital/American Fork Hospital, but at the time it was seen as something that did not provide sufficient value vs. the cost. The recent One Intermountain restructuring is intended to unify all of the Intermountain Healthcare radiation oncology centers in Utah so the Radiation Oncology Director has set the goal that all Intermountain radiation oncology programs will be accredited. Intermountain Medical Center (IMC) and Dixie Regional Medical Center (DRMC) are currently ACR accredited and can be used as model programs.
I started with an in-depth examination of our department’s workflow, documentation, and policies in order to determine where improvements to meet ACR accreditation standards could be made. I followed this up by working on implementing some of these improvements throughout the clinic and made sure they become routine and a standard in the department. An analysis of Dixie Regional Medical Center and Intermountain Medical Center’s ACR documents was performed to provide a baseline of an accredited-ACR program. Finally, a comprehensive checklist of everything that will need to be changed or implemented was presented in order to provide guidance for the future
Recommended from our members
The Balancing Act: Creating New Academic Support in Writing While Honoring The Old
In 2009, our university launched a Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) Program in response to an accreditation core requirement to focus a universitywide initiative on student learning, often referred to as the Quality Enhancement Plan. The campus committee that envisioned and documented this plan, which fortifies students’ writing skills in their future professions and disciplines, requires all undergraduate students to complete five writing-intensive courses, including the two courses in the composition sequence and two program-required, content-area courses in their major prior to graduation.University Writing Cente
Industry Advisory Board Assessment and Evaluation
Virtually all academic programs in any given discipline have an Industry Advisory Board (IAB) whose purpose is to add value to the academic program. It must be noted that the term “IAB” is generic in nature and refers to any Industry Advisory Board, Committee, Council, or otherwise named advisory group. An IAB exists to advise, assist, support, and advocate for their associated academic program and the constituents of that program.
Similar to what accreditation requires of an academic program, an IAB must periodically assess and evaluate their performance, which can lead to corrective actions and have a profound impact upon an IAB and the academic program. The contents of this paper describe two methods that an IAB can use for assessment and evaluation, namely IAB Self-Assessment and IAB Benchmarking
Analisis Preferensi Siswa SMA Di Kota Semarang Terhadap Program Studi Di Perguruan Tinggi Dengan Metode Choice-based Conjoint
This research aims to determine the design of study program that has the biggest opportunity to be chosen by the students. One method can be used to determine the preferences of high school students on existing study program in college is choice-based conjoint method. Variables used in this research are a minimum value of accreditation of selected study program that consist of three categories (A, B, and C), field of science study program that consist of two categories (exact sciences and not exact sciences), type of study program that consist of two categories (educational and not educational), and education level that consist of three categories (S1, D4, and D3). Data analysis techniques used in the choice-based conjoint method is conditional logit model. Variables order starting from the biggest contribution in influencing students preferences is accreditation of study program, level of education, type of study program, and field of science. The design of study program most likely to be chosen by the students is a study program with accreditation A, not exact sciences field, not educational type, and S1 level
Fellowship training in Acute Care Surgery: from inception to current state.
Recognizing the need for urgent and emergent surgical care across America, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma developed and implemented, and oversees, the Acute Care Surgery Fellowship Training Program. Now in its 10th year, the fellowship has become an established post-General Surgery Fellowship Training Program, with 20 approved programs and 82 fellows trained. Consistent with the desire to have this non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowship one with the highest standards, several educational improvements have occurred since its origin. The following is an account of the background and evolution of what has become a significant educational contribution to surgery
Recommended from our members
Redesigning a Bachelor Degree in Mexico for Accreditation
Accreditation is a major issue for Mexican universities. As of February 2009 there were 48 technology-related programs at 31 universities accredited in Mexico, 14 of them in Information Systems (IS). This paper describes some experiences in redesigning an IS program for accreditation purposes that can be helpful to other programs that are thinking about starting an accreditation initiative. This paper describes the four profiles defined by accreditation bodies and compares them to what programs in institutions around the world are teaching
- …
