552 research outputs found
Convolution, Separation and Concurrency
A notion of convolution is presented in the context of formal power series
together with lifting constructions characterising algebras of such series,
which usually are quantales. A number of examples underpin the universality of
these constructions, the most prominent ones being separation logics, where
convolution is separating conjunction in an assertion quantale; interval
logics, where convolution is the chop operation; and stream interval functions,
where convolution is used for analysing the trajectories of dynamical or
real-time systems. A Hoare logic is constructed in a generic fashion on the
power series quantale, which applies to each of these examples. In many cases,
commutative notions of convolution have natural interpretations as concurrency
operations.Comment: 39 page
Architectures in parametric component-based systems: Qualitative and quantitative modelling
One of the key aspects in component-based design is specifying the software
architecture that characterizes the topology and the permissible interactions
of the components of a system. To achieve well-founded design there is need to
address both the qualitative and non-functional aspects of architectures. In
this paper we study the qualitative and quantitative formal modelling of
architectures applied on parametric component-based systems, that consist of an
unknown number of instances of each component. Specifically, we introduce an
extended propositional interaction logic and investigate its first-order level
which serves as a formal language for the interactions of parametric systems.
Our logics achieve to encode the execution order of interactions, which is a
main feature in several important architectures, as well as to model recursive
interactions. Moreover, we prove the decidability of equivalence,
satisfiability, and validity of first-order extended interaction logic
formulas, and provide several examples of formulas describing well-known
architectures. We show the robustness of our theory by effectively extending
our results for parametric weighted architectures. For this, we study the
weighted counterparts of our logics over a commutative semiring, and we apply
them for modelling the quantitative aspects of concrete architectures. Finally,
we prove that the equivalence problem of weighted first-order extended
interaction logic formulas is decidable in a large class of semirings, namely
the class (of subsemirings) of skew fields.Comment: 53 pages, 11 figure
Specification and Verification using Temporal Logics
International audienceThis chapter illustrates two aspects of automata theory related to linear-time temporal logic LTL used for the verification of computer systems. First, we present a translation from LTL formulae to Büchi automata. The aim is to design an elementary translation which is reasonably efficient and produces small automata so that it can be easily taught and used by hand on real examples. Our translation is in the spirit of the classical tableau constructions but is optimized in several ways. Secondly, we recall how temporal operators can be defined from regular languages and we explain why adding even a single operator definable by a context-free language can lead to undecidability
Quantified CTL: Expressiveness and Complexity
While it was defined long ago, the extension of CTL with quantification over
atomic propositions has never been studied extensively. Considering two
different semantics (depending whether propositional quantification refers to
the Kripke structure or to its unwinding tree), we study its expressiveness
(showing in particular that QCTL coincides with Monadic Second-Order Logic for
both semantics) and characterise the complexity of its model-checking and
satisfiability problems, depending on the number of nested propositional
quantifiers (showing that the structure semantics populates the polynomial
hierarchy while the tree semantics populates the exponential hierarchy)
Recommended from our members
Convolution as a unifying concept: Applications in separation logic, interval calculi and concurrency
The research reported here was supported in part by Australian Research Council Grant No. DP130102901 and EPSRC Grant No. EP/J003727/1
A specification patterns system for discrete event systems analysis
As formal verification tools gain popularity, the problem arises of making them more accessible to engineers. A correct understanding of the logics used to express properties of a system's behavior is needed in order to guarantee that properties correctly encode the intent of the verification process. Writing appropriate properties, in a logic suitable for verification, is a skillful process. Errors in this step of the process can create serious problems since a false sense of safety is gained with the analysis. However, when compared to the effort put into developing and applying modeling languages, little attention has been devoted to the process of writing properties that accurately capture verification requirements. In this paper we illustrate how a collection of property patterns can help in simplifying the process of generating logical formulae from informally expressed requirements
Model checking quantum protocols
This thesis describes model checking techniques for protocols arising in quantum information
theory and quantum cryptography. We discuss the theory and implementation of a practical
model checker, QMC, for quantum protocols. In our framework, we assume that the quantum
operations performed in a protocol are restricted to those within the stabilizer formalism; while
this particular set of operations is not universal for quantum computation, it allows us to develop
models of several useful protocols as well as of systems involving both classical and quantum
information processing. We detail the syntax, semantics and type system of QMC’s modelling
language, the logic QCTL which is used for verification, and the verification algorithms that have
been implemented in the tool. We demonstrate our techniques with applications to a number of
case studies
Verification of Non-Regular Program Properties
Most temporal logics which have been introduced and studied in the past decades can be embedded into the modal mu-calculus. This is the case for e.g. PDL, CTL, CTL*, ECTL, LTL, etc. and entails that these logics cannot express non-regular program properties. In recent years, some novel approaches towards an increase in expressive power have been made: Fixpoint Logic with Chop enriches the mu-calculus with a sequential composition operator and thereby allows to characterise context-free processes. The Modal Iteration Calculus uses inflationary fixpoints to exceed the expressive power of the mu-calculus. Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic (HFL) incorporates a simply typed lambda-calculus into a setting with extremal fixpoint operators and even exceeds the expressive power of Fixpoint Logic with Chop. But also PDL has been equipped with context-free programs instead of regular ones.
In terms of expressivity there is a natural demand for richer frameworks since program property specifications are simply not limited to the regular sphere. Expressivity however usually comes at the price of an increased computational complexity of logic-related decision problems. For instance are the satisfiability problems for the above mentioned logics undecidable. We investigate in this work the model checking problem of three different logics which are capable of expressing non-regular program properties and aim at identifying fragments with feasible model checking complexity.
Firstly, we develop a generic method for determining the complexity of model checking PDL over arbitrary classes of programs and show that the border to undecidability runs between PDL over indexed languages and PDL over context-sensitive languages. It is however still in PTIME for PDL over linear indexed languages and in EXPTIME for PDL over indexed languages. We present concrete algorithms which allow implementations of model checkers for these two fragments.
We then introduce an extension of CTL in which the UNTIL- and RELEASE- operators are adorned with formal languages. These are interpreted over labeled paths and restrict the moments on such a path at which the operators are satisfied. The UNTIL-operator is for instance satisfied if some path prefix forms a word in the language it is adorned with (besides the usual requirement that until that moment some property has to hold and at that very moment some other property must hold). Again, we determine the computational complexities of the model checking problems for varying classes of allowed languages in either operator. It turns out that either enabling context-sensitive languages in the UNTIL or context-free languages in the RELEASE- operator renders the model checking problem undecidable while it is EXPTIME-complete for indexed languages in the UNTIL and visibly pushdown languages in the RELEASE- operator. PTIME-completeness is a result of allowing linear indexed languages in the UNTIL and deterministic context-free languages in the RELEASE. We do also give concrete model checking algorithms for several interesting fragments of these logics.
Finally, we turn our attention to the model checking problem of HFL which we have already studied in previous works. On finite state models it is k-EXPTIME-complete for HFL(k), the fragment of HFL obtained by restricting functions in the lambda-calculus to order k. Novel in this work is however the generalisation (from the first-order case to the case for functions of arbitrary order) of an idea to improve the best and average case behaviour of a model checking algorithm by using partial functions during the fixpoint iteration guided by the neededness of arguments. This is possible, because the semantics of a closed HFL formula is not a total function but the value of a function at some argument. Again, we give a concrete algorithm for such an improved model checker and argue that despite the very high model checking complexity this improvement is very useful in practice and gives feasible results for HFL with lower order fuctions, backed up by a statistical analysis of the number of needed arguments on a concrete example.
Furthermore, we show how HFL can be used as a tool for the development of algorithms. Its high expressivity allows to encode a wide variety of problems as instances of model checking already in the first-order fragment. The rather unintuitive -- yet very succinct -- problem encoding together with an analysis of the behaviour of the above sketched optimisation may give deep insights into the problem. We demonstrate this on the example of the universality problem for nondeterministic finite automata, where a slight variation of the optimised model checking algorithm yields one of the best known methods so far which was only discovered recently.
We do also investigate typical model-theoretic properties for each of these logics and compare them with respect to expressive power
- …