2 research outputs found
Probability and the Classical/Quantum Divide
This paper considers the problem of distinguishing between classical and
quantum domains in macroscopic phenomena using tests based on probability and
it presents a condition on the ratios of the outcomes being the same (Ps) to
being different (Pn). Given three events, Ps/Pn for the classical case, where
there are no 3-way coincidences, is one-half whereas for the quantum state it
is one-third. For non-maximally entangled objects we find that so long as r <
5.83, we can separate them from classical objects using a probability test. For
maximally entangled particles (r = 1), we propose that the value of 5/12 be
used for Ps/Pn to separate classical and quantum states when no other
information is available and measurements are noisy.Comment: 12 pages; 1 figur
From the No-Signaling Theorem to Veiled Nonlocality
According to the no-signaling theorem, the nonlocal collapse of the
wavefunction of an entangled particle by the measurement on its twin particle
at a remote location cannot be used to send useful information. Given that
experiments on nonlocal correlations continue to have loopholes, we propose a
stronger principle that the nonlocality of quantum mechanics itself is veiled.
In practical terms, decoherence and noise compels us to view the wavefunction
as representing knowledge of potential outcomes rather than the reality.
Experimental evidence in favor of naked nonlocality would support the view of
the wavefunction as an objective description of physical reality.Comment: 11 page