11,967 research outputs found
A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning
Federated learning facilitates the collaborative training of models without
the sharing of raw data. However, recent attacks demonstrate that simply
maintaining data locality during training processes does not provide sufficient
privacy guarantees. Rather, we need a federated learning system capable of
preventing inference over both the messages exchanged during training and the
final trained model while ensuring the resulting model also has acceptable
predictive accuracy. Existing federated learning approaches either use secure
multiparty computation (SMC) which is vulnerable to inference or differential
privacy which can lead to low accuracy given a large number of parties with
relatively small amounts of data each. In this paper, we present an alternative
approach that utilizes both differential privacy and SMC to balance these
trade-offs. Combining differential privacy with secure multiparty computation
enables us to reduce the growth of noise injection as the number of parties
increases without sacrificing privacy while maintaining a pre-defined rate of
trust. Our system is therefore a scalable approach that protects against
inference threats and produces models with high accuracy. Additionally, our
system can be used to train a variety of machine learning models, which we
validate with experimental results on 3 different machine learning algorithms.
Our experiments demonstrate that our approach out-performs state of the art
solutions
Privacy-Friendly Collaboration for Cyber Threat Mitigation
Sharing of security data across organizational boundaries has often been
advocated as a promising way to enhance cyber threat mitigation. However,
collaborative security faces a number of important challenges, including
privacy, trust, and liability concerns with the potential disclosure of
sensitive data. In this paper, we focus on data sharing for predictive
blacklisting, i.e., forecasting attack sources based on past attack
information. We propose a novel privacy-enhanced data sharing approach in which
organizations estimate collaboration benefits without disclosing their
datasets, organize into coalitions of allied organizations, and securely share
data within these coalitions. We study how different partner selection
strategies affect prediction accuracy by experimenting on a real-world dataset
of 2 billion IP addresses and observe up to a 105% prediction improvement.Comment: This paper has been withdrawn as it has been superseded by
arXiv:1502.0533
Controlled Data Sharing for Collaborative Predictive Blacklisting
Although sharing data across organizations is often advocated as a promising
way to enhance cybersecurity, collaborative initiatives are rarely put into
practice owing to confidentiality, trust, and liability challenges. In this
paper, we investigate whether collaborative threat mitigation can be realized
via a controlled data sharing approach, whereby organizations make informed
decisions as to whether or not, and how much, to share. Using appropriate
cryptographic tools, entities can estimate the benefits of collaboration and
agree on what to share in a privacy-preserving way, without having to disclose
their datasets. We focus on collaborative predictive blacklisting, i.e.,
forecasting attack sources based on one's logs and those contributed by other
organizations. We study the impact of different sharing strategies by
experimenting on a real-world dataset of two billion suspicious IP addresses
collected from Dshield over two months. We find that controlled data sharing
yields up to 105% accuracy improvement on average, while also reducing the
false positive rate.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in DIMVA 2015. This is
the full version. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with
arXiv:1403.212
- …