11,690 research outputs found
Privacy-Preserving Trust Management Mechanisms from Private Matching Schemes
Cryptographic primitives are essential for constructing privacy-preserving
communication mechanisms. There are situations in which two parties that do not
know each other need to exchange sensitive information on the Internet. Trust
management mechanisms make use of digital credentials and certificates in order
to establish trust among these strangers. We address the problem of choosing
which credentials are exchanged. During this process, each party should learn
no information about the preferences of the other party other than strictly
required for trust establishment. We present a method to reach an agreement on
the credentials to be exchanged that preserves the privacy of the parties. Our
method is based on secure two-party computation protocols for set intersection.
Namely, it is constructed from private matching schemes.Comment: The material in this paper will be presented in part at the 8th DPM
International Workshop on Data Privacy Management (DPM 2013
Confidentiality-Preserving Publish/Subscribe: A Survey
Publish/subscribe (pub/sub) is an attractive communication paradigm for
large-scale distributed applications running across multiple administrative
domains. Pub/sub allows event-based information dissemination based on
constraints on the nature of the data rather than on pre-established
communication channels. It is a natural fit for deployment in untrusted
environments such as public clouds linking applications across multiple sites.
However, pub/sub in untrusted environments lead to major confidentiality
concerns stemming from the content-centric nature of the communications. This
survey classifies and analyzes different approaches to confidentiality
preservation for pub/sub, from applications of trust and access control models
to novel encryption techniques. It provides an overview of the current
challenges posed by confidentiality concerns and points to future research
directions in this promising field
Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Survey
This book chapter identifies various security threats in wireless mesh
network (WMN). Keeping in mind the critical requirement of security and user
privacy in WMNs, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of various
possible attacks on different layers of the communication protocol stack for
WMNs and their corresponding defense mechanisms. First, it identifies the
security vulnerabilities in the physical, link, network, transport, application
layers. Furthermore, various possible attacks on the key management protocols,
user authentication and access control protocols, and user privacy preservation
protocols are presented. After enumerating various possible attacks, the
chapter provides a detailed discussion on various existing security mechanisms
and protocols to defend against and wherever possible prevent the possible
attacks. Comparative analyses are also presented on the security schemes with
regards to the cryptographic schemes used, key management strategies deployed,
use of any trusted third party, computation and communication overhead involved
etc. The chapter then presents a brief discussion on various trust management
approaches for WMNs since trust and reputation-based schemes are increasingly
becoming popular for enforcing security in wireless networks. A number of open
problems in security and privacy issues for WMNs are subsequently discussed
before the chapter is finally concluded.Comment: 62 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables. This chapter is an extension of the
author's previous submission in arXiv submission: arXiv:1102.1226. There are
some text overlaps with the previous submissio
Sharing Computer Network Logs for Security and Privacy: A Motivation for New Methodologies of Anonymization
Logs are one of the most fundamental resources to any security professional.
It is widely recognized by the government and industry that it is both
beneficial and desirable to share logs for the purpose of security research.
However, the sharing is not happening or not to the degree or magnitude that is
desired. Organizations are reluctant to share logs because of the risk of
exposing sensitive information to potential attackers. We believe this
reluctance remains high because current anonymization techniques are weak and
one-size-fits-all--or better put, one size tries to fit all. We must develop
standards and make anonymization available at varying levels, striking a
balance between privacy and utility. Organizations have different needs and
trust other organizations to different degrees. They must be able to map
multiple anonymization levels with defined risks to the trust levels they share
with (would-be) receivers. It is not until there are industry standards for
multiple levels of anonymization that we will be able to move forward and
achieve the goal of widespread sharing of logs for security researchers.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figur
- …