5 research outputs found
Cognitive mechanisms of normal and pathological forgetting
The objectives of this PhD were to investigate forgetting, how to measure forgetting and what
are the underlying mechanisms behind this effect.
1. Following the progress of forgetting over time will require repeated testing. There is
strong evidence that this may enhance recall, while opposing evidence, from part-set
cueing studies suggests that probing one item may reduce the memorability of others
within the set. It appears that whenever we test memory, we change it, but how?
Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 compare long-term forgetting in healthy younger and
older individuals and investigates whether repeated partial testing will enhance long-term
memory performance based on the level of semantic coherence or integration of material
to be remembered, possibly via a relearning or a priming effect.
2. Some previous studies showed that, under particular experimental conditions, patients
suffering from a range of memory deficits (i.e., amnesia) appear to retain what they have
learnt as well as controls (Huppert, & Piercy, 1978; 1979; Squire, 1981; Kopelman, 1985;
Freed, Corkin & Cohen, 1987; Frisk & Milner, 1990a; 1991; Greene et al., 1995). A
challenge to this view comes from a subsample of epileptic patients, who have been
found to show accelerated long-term forgetting (ALF), in some cases showing normal
learning over a period of 30 minutes to one hour, followed by dramatic loss of
information later on (Butler & Zeman, 2008). Whether ALF applies to other patient
populations remains to be established. Experiment 3 examines long-term forgetting as
well as the effect of repeated partial testing in healthy people and in people with
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Assessing whether AD patients present with ALF and
whether repeated partial testing delays long-term forgetting in both groups.
3. A frequent assumption is that when comparing two groups they should be matched on
level of initial learning. At the same time, several influential studies from the early literature suggest that initial degrees of learning do not influence the rate of forgetting in
the long-term (e.g., Slamecka & McElree, 1983; Slamecka, 1985). Experiment 4 is a
replication of Experiment 1 from Slamecka & McElree’s (1983) classic study.
4. Achieving a particular degree of learning at encoding will require more exposures for
lower performing individuals compared to high performing individuals. Therefore,
Experiment 5 aimed to examine whether varying the degrees of learning at encoding will
differentially affect participants long-term forgetting rate based on their individual
learning capacity.
5. An important classification of long-term memory is based on its temporal direction.
While retrospective memory (RM) deals with past information, the remembering of
future intentions depends on prospective memory (PM). The similarities between these
two memory types have been frequently raised, yet an important distinction lies in their
evaluation. When we measure RM tasks (in the laboratory) the participant is specifically
directed to retrieve information, while when measuring PM tasks, the retrieval of the
intended action is self-initiated. Experiment 6 investigated whether the retrieval of an
intended PM action would be facilitated if participants repeated back the PM task
multiple times at encoding (i.e., learned the PM task more).
6. In everyday life we typically only remember the gist of events that are encountered once
and processed incidentally. Similarly, even events that are encountered repeatedly can be
processed incidentally, with much of the rich contextual details being forgotten. In the
forgetting literature, one class of such repetitive events such as taking medication daily,
refer to habitual PM. In habitual PM the necessity of initiating (or not) a certain action is
highly dependent on the accurate memory of the previously performed action (Marsh et
al., 2007; McDaniel et al., 2009). The aim of Experiment 7 was to examine forgetting of
habitual PM tasks and its underlying mechanisms, as well as to devise a method to
enhance the memory of previously performed actions in habitual PM