8,073 research outputs found

    TikTok’s Influence on Generation Z Female’s Comparative Behavior

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to address TikTok’s role in the comparative behaviors among Generation Z females. This study specifically evaluated the communication of society’s perception of beauty standards and how it resonates with and influences TikTok users. A qualitative approach was taken to gain a better understanding of the lived experiences of participants and fill the gap in qualitative media effects research. The research question being addressed was: How has TikTok influenced society\u27s idea of physical beauty and body image concerns among Generation Z females? Through the lens of social comparison theory, the research found that the application TikTok itself plays a reinforcement role in communicating physical beauty standards and creates more opportunities for upward comparisons and therefore negative body image concerns among Generation Z females. Findings also show that content surrounding the physicality of an individual, like fitness and fashion content, leads to more upward comparisons and therefore negative body image concerns. Additional findings also include the positive mental health effects of TikTok and user lifestyle comparisons

    How do patients and providers navigate the “corruption complex” in mixed health systems? The case of Abuja, Nigeria.

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades, scholars have sought to investigate the causes, manifestations, and impacts of corruption in healthcare. Most of this scholarship has focused on corruption as it occurs in public health facilities. However, in Nigeria, in which most residents attend private health facilities for at least some of their care needs, this focus is incomplete. In such contexts, it is important to understand corruption as it occurs across both public and private settings, and in the interactions between them. This study seeks to address this gap. It aims to examine how corruption is experienced by, and impacts upon, patients and providers as they navigate the “corruption complex” in the mixed health system of Abuja, Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: This over-arching aim is addressed via three interrelated objectives, as follows: 1.To investigate the experiences of patients and providers concerning the causes, manifestations, and impacts of corruption in public health facilities, in Abuja, Nigeria. 2.To investigate patients / provider experiences of corruption as they relate to private health facilities in Abuja, Nigeria. 3.To investigate how, and the extent to which, corruption is enabled by the co-existence of and interactions between public and private health facilities in the context of the mixed health system of Nigeria – and of Abuja in particular. METHODS: All three objectives are addressed via a qualitative exploratory study. Data was collected in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (between October 2021 to May 2022) through: (i) in-depth interviews with 53 key informants, representing a range of patient and provider types, and policymakers; and (ii) participant observation over eight months of fieldwork. The research took place in three secondary-level public health facilities (Gwarinpa, Kubwa, and Wuse General hospital) and three equivalent-sized private health facilities (Nissa, Garki, and King's Care Hospital) in Abuja. The empirical data was analysed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) reflexive thematic analysis approach and presented in a narrative form. Abuja was selected as the research setting, as the city is representative of the mixed health system structures that exist in Nigeria, especially in the country’s larger urban areas. RESULTS: Objective 1: Corruption in public health facilities is driven by a shortage of resources, low salaries, commercialisation of health and relationships between patients and providers, and weak accountability structures. Corruption takes various forms which include: bribery, informal payments, theft, influence- activities associated with nepotism, and pressure from informal rules. Impacts include erosion of the right to health care and patient dignity, alongside increased barriers to access, including financial barriers, especially for poorer patients. Objective 2: Corruption in private health facilities is driven by incentives aimed at profit maximisation, poor regulation, and lack of oversight. Corruption takes various forms which include: inappropriate or unnecessary prescriptions (often driven by the potential for kickbacks), forging of medical reports, over-invoicing, and other related types of fraud, and under/over-treatment of patients. Impacts include reductions to the quality of care provided and exacerbation of financial risks to patients. Objective 3: The nature of public-private sector interactions creates scope for several forms of corruption. For example, these interactions contribute to the causes of corruption in the public sector - especially the problem of scarcity of resources. Related manifestations include dual practice, absenteeism, and theft (e.g., diversion of patients, medical supplies, and equipment from public to private facilities). The impacts of such practices include inequities of access, for example, due to delays in and denials of needed services and additional financial barriers encountered in public facilities, alongside reductions to quality of care, pricing transparency and financial protection in private facilities. CONCLUSION: Patients experience corruption in both public and private health facilities in Abuja, Nigeria. The causes, manifestations and impacts of corruption differ across these settings. In the public sector, corruption creates financial and non-financial barriers to care – aggravating inequities of access. In the private health sector, corruption undermines quality of care and exacerbates financial risks. The public-private mix is itself implicated in the problem – giving rise to new opportunities for corruption, to the detriment of patients’ health and welfare. For policymakers in Nigeria to address the problem of corruption, a cross-sectoral approach - inclusive of the full range of providers within the mixed health system – will be required

    Southern Adventist University Undergraduate Catalog 2023-2024

    Get PDF
    Southern Adventist University\u27s undergraduate catalog for the academic year 2023-2024.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/undergrad_catalog/1123/thumbnail.jp

    UMSL Bulletin 2023-2024

    Get PDF
    The 2023-2024 Bulletin and Course Catalog for the University of Missouri St. Louis.https://irl.umsl.edu/bulletin/1088/thumbnail.jp

    Graduate Catalog of Studies, 2023-2024

    Get PDF

    Examining systemic and dispositional factors impacting historically disenfranchised schools across North Carolina

    Get PDF
    This mixed method sequential explanatory study provided analysis of North Carolina (NC) school leaders’ dispositions in eliminating opportunity gaps, outlined in NC’s strategic plan. The study’s quantitative phase used descriptive and correlation analysis of eight Likert subscales around four tenets of transformative leadership (Shields, 2011) and aspects of critical race theory (Bell, 1992; Ladson-Billings, 1998; Ladson-Billings & Tate, 2006) to understand systemic inequities and leadership attitudes. The qualitative phase comprised three analyses of education leadership dispositions and systemic factors in NC schools. The first analysis of State Board of Education meeting minutes from 2018–2023 quantified and analyzed utterances of racism and critical race, outlined the sociopolitical context of such utterances, and identified systemic patterns and state leader dispositions. The second analysis of five interviews of K–12 graduates identified persistent and systemic factors influencing NC education 3 decades after Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and within the context of Leandro v. State of NC (1997), where the NC Supreme Court recognized the state constitutional right for every student to access a “sound basic education.” The final qualitative analysis consisted of five interviews of current NC public school system leaders, for personal narratives of the state of NC schools compared to patterns from lived experiences of NC K–12 graduates. The study’s findings suggested NC school and state education leaders experience a racialized dichotomy between willingness for change (equity intentions) and execution of transformative action (practice). Although leaders at the board and school levels recognize the need for inclusivity and equity, a struggle to transcend systemic challenges, especially rooted in racial biases and power dynamics is evident. This study may identify leadership qualities needed for change in NC to address systemic inequities for improving educational access and inform policy to uphold all students’ constitutional right to a sound, basic education
    corecore