Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Distributed Deep Learning Frameworks on GPUs

Deep learning frameworks have been widely deployed on GPU servers for deep learning applications in both academia and industry. In training deep neural networks (DNNs), there are many standard processes or algorithms, such as convolution and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), but the running performance of different frameworks might be different even running the same deep model on the same GPU hardware. In this study, we evaluate the running performance of four state-of-the-art distributed deep learning frameworks (i.e., Caffe-MPI, CNTK, MXNet, and TensorFlow) over single-GPU, multi-GPU, and multi-node environments. We first build performance models of standard processes in training DNNs with SGD, and then we benchmark the running performance of these frameworks with three popular convolutional neural networks (i.e., AlexNet, GoogleNet and ResNet-50), after that, we analyze what factors that result in the performance gap among these four frameworks. Through both analytical and experimental analysis, we identify bottlenecks and overheads which could be further optimized. The main contribution is that the proposed performance models and the analysis provide further optimization directions in both algorithmic design and system configuration.Comment: Published at DataCom'201

Distributed learning of CNNs on heterogeneous CPU/GPU architectures

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown to be powerful classification tools in tasks that range from check reading to medical diagnosis, reaching close to human perception, and in some cases surpassing it. However, the problems to solve are becoming larger and more complex, which translates to larger CNNs, leading to longer training times that not even the adoption of Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) could keep up to. This problem is partially solved by using more processing units and distributed training methods that are offered by several frameworks dedicated to neural network training. However, these techniques do not take full advantage of the possible parallelization offered by CNNs and the cooperative use of heterogeneous devices with different processing capabilities, clock speeds, memory size, among others. This paper presents a new method for the parallel training of CNNs that can be considered as a particular instantiation of model parallelism, where only the convolutional layer is distributed. In fact, the convolutions processed during training (forward and backward propagation included) represent from $60$-$90$\% of global processing time. The paper analyzes the influence of network size, bandwidth, batch size, number of devices, including their processing capabilities, and other parameters. Results show that this technique is capable of diminishing the training time without affecting the classification performance for both CPUs and GPUs. For the CIFAR-10 dataset, using a CNN with two convolutional layers, and $500$ and $1500$ kernels, respectively, best speedups achieve $3.28\times$ using four CPUs and $2.45\times$ with three GPUs. Modern imaging datasets, larger and more complex than CIFAR-10 will certainly require more than $60$-$90$\% of processing time calculating convolutions, and speedups will tend to increase accordingly

EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Network

State-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) have hundreds of millions of connections and are both computationally and memory intensive, making them difficult to deploy on embedded systems with limited hardware resources and power budgets. While custom hardware helps the computation, fetching weights from DRAM is two orders of magnitude more expensive than ALU operations, and dominates the required power. Previously proposed 'Deep Compression' makes it possible to fit large DNNs (AlexNet and VGGNet) fully in on-chip SRAM. This compression is achieved by pruning the redundant connections and having multiple connections share the same weight. We propose an energy efficient inference engine (EIE) that performs inference on this compressed network model and accelerates the resulting sparse matrix-vector multiplication with weight sharing. Going from DRAM to SRAM gives EIE 120x energy saving; Exploiting sparsity saves 10x; Weight sharing gives 8x; Skipping zero activations from ReLU saves another 3x. Evaluated on nine DNN benchmarks, EIE is 189x and 13x faster when compared to CPU and GPU implementations of the same DNN without compression. EIE has a processing power of 102GOPS/s working directly on a compressed network, corresponding to 3TOPS/s on an uncompressed network, and processes FC layers of AlexNet at 1.88x10^4 frames/sec with a power dissipation of only 600mW. It is 24,000x and 3,400x more energy efficient than a CPU and GPU respectively. Compared with DaDianNao, EIE has 2.9x, 19x and 3x better throughput, energy efficiency and area efficiency.Comment: External Links: TheNextPlatform: http://goo.gl/f7qX0L ; O'Reilly: https://goo.gl/Id1HNT ; Hacker News: https://goo.gl/KM72SV ; Embedded-vision: http://goo.gl/joQNg8 ; Talk at NVIDIA GTC'16: http://goo.gl/6wJYvn ; Talk at Embedded Vision Summit: https://goo.gl/7abFNe ; Talk at Stanford University: https://goo.gl/6lwuer. Published as a conference paper in ISCA 201

vDNN: Virtualized Deep Neural Networks for Scalable, Memory-Efficient Neural Network Design

The most widely used machine learning frameworks require users to carefully tune their memory usage so that the deep neural network (DNN) fits into the DRAM capacity of a GPU. This restriction hampers a researcher's flexibility to study different machine learning algorithms, forcing them to either use a less desirable network architecture or parallelize the processing across multiple GPUs. We propose a runtime memory manager that virtualizes the memory usage of DNNs such that both GPU and CPU memory can simultaneously be utilized for training larger DNNs. Our virtualized DNN (vDNN) reduces the average GPU memory usage of AlexNet by up to 89%, OverFeat by 91%, and GoogLeNet by 95%, a significant reduction in memory requirements of DNNs. Similar experiments on VGG-16, one of the deepest and memory hungry DNNs to date, demonstrate the memory-efficiency of our proposal. vDNN enables VGG-16 with batch size 256 (requiring 28 GB of memory) to be trained on a single NVIDIA Titan X GPU card containing 12 GB of memory, with 18% performance loss compared to a hypothetical, oracular GPU with enough memory to hold the entire DNN.Comment: Published as a conference paper at the 49th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO-49), 201