DCU's experiments in NTCIR-8 IR4QA task

We describe DCU's participation in the NTCIR-8 IR4QA task [16]. This task is a cross-language information retrieval(CLIR) task from English to Simplified Chinese which seeks to provide relevant documents for later cross language question answering (CLQA) tasks. For the IR4QA task, we submitted 5 official runs including two monolingual runs and three CLIR runs. For the monolingual retrieval we tested two information retrieval models. The results show that the KL-Divergence language model method performs better than the Okapi BM25 model for the Simplified Chinese retrieval task. This agrees with our previous CLIR experimental results at NTCIR-5. For the CLIR task, we compare query translation and document translation methods. In the query translation based runs, we tested a method for query expansion from external resource (QEE) before query translation. Our result for this run is slightly lower than the run without QEE. Our results show that the document translation method achieves 68.24% MAP performance compared to our best query translation run. For the document translation method, we found that the main issue is the lack of named entity translation in the documents since we do not have a suitable parallel corpus for training data for the statistical machine translation system. Our best CLIR run comes from the combination of query translation using Google translate and the KL-Divergence language model retrieval method. It achieves 79.94% MAP relative to our best monolingual run

Relevance Assessments for Web Search Evaluation: Should We Randomise or Prioritise the Pooled Documents? (CORRECTED VERSION)

In the context of depth-$k$ pooling for constructing web search test collections, we compare two approaches to ordering pooled documents for relevance assessors: the prioritisation strategy (PRI) used widely at NTCIR, and the simple randomisation strategy (RND). In order to address research questions regarding PRI and RND, we have constructed and released the WWW3E8 data set, which contains eight independent relevance labels for 32,375 topic-document pairs, i.e., a total of 259,000 labels. Four of the eight relevance labels were obtained from PRI-based pools; the other four were obtained from RND-based pools. Using WWW3E8, we compare PRI and RND in terms of inter-assessor agreement, system ranking agreement, and robustness to new systems that did not contribute to the pools. We also utilise an assessor activity log we obtained as a byproduct of WWW3E8 to compare the two strategies in terms of assessment efficiency.Comment: 30 pages. This is a corrected version of an open-access TOIS paper ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3494833

Cross-language Information Retrieval

Two key assumptions shape the usual view of ranked retrieval: (1) that the searcher can choose words for their query that might appear in the documents that they wish to see, and (2) that ranking retrieved documents will suffice because the searcher will be able to recognize those which they wished to find. When the documents to be searched are in a language not known by the searcher, neither assumption is true. In such cases, Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) is needed. This chapter reviews the state of the art for CLIR and outlines some open research questions.Comment: 49 pages, 0 figure

Questions-Réponses en domaine ouvert (sélection pertinente de documents en fonction du contexte de la question)

Les problématiques abordées dans ma thèse sont de définir une adaptation unifiée entre la sélection des documents et les stratégies de recherche de la réponse à partir du type des documents et de celui des questions, intégrer la solution au système de Questions-Réponses (QR) RITEL du LIMSI et évaluer son apport. Nous développons et étudions une méthode basée sur une approche de Recherche d Information pour la sélection de documents en QR. Celle-ci s appuie sur un modèle de langue et un modèle de classification binaire de texte en catégorie pertinent ou non pertinent d un point de vue QR. Cette méthode permet de filtrer les documents sélectionnés pour l extraction de réponses par un système QR. Nous présentons la méthode et ses modèles, et la testons dans le cadre QR à l aide de RITEL. L évaluation est faite en français en contexte web sur un corpus de 500 000 pages web et de questions factuelles fournis par le programme Quaero. Celle-ci est menée soit sur des documents complets, soit sur des segments de documents. L hypothèse suivie est que le contenu informationnel des segments est plus cohérent et facilite l extraction de réponses. Dans le premier cas, les gains obtenus sont faibles comparés aux résultats de référence (sans filtrage). Dans le second cas, les gains sont plus élevés et confortent l hypothèse, sans pour autant être significatifs. Une étude approfondie des liens existant entre les performances de RITEL et les paramètres de filtrage complète ces évaluations. Le système de segmentation créé pour travailler sur des segments est détaillé et évalué. Son évaluation nous sert à mesurer l impact de la variabilité naturelle des pages web (en taille et en contenu) sur la tâche QR, en lien avec l hypothèse précédente. En général, les résultats expérimentaux obtenus suggèrent que notre méthode aide un système QR dans sa tâche. Cependant, de nouvelles évaluations sont à mener pour rendre ces résultats significatifs, et notamment en utilisant des corpus de questions plus importants.This thesis aims at defining a unified adaptation of the document selection and answer extraction strategies, based on the document and question types, in a Question-Answering (QA) context. The solution is integrated in RITEL (a LIMSI QA system) to assess the contribution. We develop and investigate a method based on an Information Retrieval approach for the selection of relevant documents in QA. The method is based on a language model and a binary model of textual classification in relevant or irrelevant category. It is used to filter unusable documents for answer extraction by matching lists of a priori relevant documents to the question type automatically. First, we present the method along with its underlying models and we evaluate it on the QA task with RITEL in French. The evaluation is done on a corpus of 500,000 unsegmented web pages with factoid questions provided by the Quaero program (i.e. evaluation at the document level or D-level). Then, we evaluate the methodon segmented web pages (i.e. evaluation at the segment level or S-level). The idea is that information content is more consistent with segments, which facilitates answer extraction. D-filtering brings a small improvement over the baseline (no filtering). S-filtering outperforms both the baseline and D-filtering but not significantly. Finally, we study at the S-level the links between RITEL s performances and the key parameters of the method. In order to apply the method on segments, we created a system of web page segmentation. We present and evaluate it on the QA task with the same corpora used to evaluate our document selection method. This evaluation follows the former hypothesis and measures the impact of natural web page variability (in terms of size and content) on RITEL in its task. In general, the experimental results we obtained suggest that our IR-based method helps a QA system in its task, however further investigations should be conducted especially with larger corpora of questions to make them significant.PARIS11-SCD-Bib. électronique (914719901) / SudocSudocFranceF