2,371,845 research outputs found
Replications and Extensions in Marketing – Rarely Published But Quite Contrary
Replication is rare in marketing. Of 1,120 papers sampled from three major marketing journals, none were replications. Only 1.8% of the papers were extensions, and they consumed 1.1% of the journal space. On average, these extensions appeared seven years after the original study. The publication rate for such works has been decreasing since the 1970s. Published extensions typically produced results that conflicted with the original studies; of the 20 extensions published, 12 conflicted with the earlier results, and only 3 provided full confirmation. Published replications do not attract as many citations after publication as do the original studies, even when the results fail to support the original studies
Recommended from our members
Alive and kicking: a progress report on Open Access, institutional repositories, and health information
The Open Access movement has promoted two parallel strands of information dissemination - OA publishing, and self-archiving in OA repositories. But while the original focus was peer-reviewed scientific research papers, repositories have extended their role well beyond the original OA concept, generating a lively debate about the role of the OA movement. This paper reviews recent developments internationally, examining different OA strategies, and looking in particular at activities within the field of health information
Prediction of highly cited papers
In an article written five years ago [arXiv:0809.0522], we described a method
for predicting which scientific papers will be highly cited in the future, even
if they are currently not highly cited. Applying the method to real citation
data we made predictions about papers we believed would end up being well
cited. Here we revisit those predictions, five years on, to see how well we
did. Among the over 2000 papers in our original data set, we examine the fifty
that, by the measures of our previous study, were predicted to do best and we
find that they have indeed received substantially more citations in the
intervening years than other papers, even after controlling for the number of
prior citations. On average these top fifty papers have received 23 times as
many citations in the last five years as the average paper in the data set as a
whole, and 15 times as many as the average paper in a randomly drawn control
group that started out with the same number of citations. Applying our
prediction technique to current data, we also make new predictions of papers
that we believe will be well cited in the next few years.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, 2 table
Full Issue 10.3
Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Co.The original of this document is in the Stevens Family Papers, #1210, at the Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library, Ithaca, New York 14853
- …
