1,125 research outputs found
Lower Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity
Shor's and Grover's famous quantum algorithms for factoring and searching
show that quantum computers can solve certain computational problems
significantly faster than any classical computer. We discuss here what quantum
computers_cannot_ do, and specifically how to prove limits on their
computational power. We cover the main known techniques for proving lower
bounds, and exemplify and compare the methods.Comment: survey, 23 page
Information-theoretic lower bounds for quantum sorting
We analyze the quantum query complexity of sorting under partial information.
In this problem, we are given a partially ordered set and are asked to
identify a linear extension of using pairwise comparisons. For the standard
sorting problem, in which is empty, it is known that the quantum query
complexity is not asymptotically smaller than the classical
information-theoretic lower bound. We prove that this holds for a wide class of
partially ordered sets, thereby improving on a result from Yao (STOC'04)
Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better upper and lower bounds
Brand\~ao and Svore very recently gave quantum algorithms for approximately
solving semidefinite programs, which in some regimes are faster than the
best-possible classical algorithms in terms of the dimension of the problem
and the number of constraints, but worse in terms of various other
parameters. In this paper we improve their algorithms in several ways, getting
better dependence on those other parameters. To this end we develop new
techniques for quantum algorithms, for instance a general way to efficiently
implement smooth functions of sparse Hamiltonians, and a generalized
minimum-finding procedure.
We also show limits on this approach to quantum SDP-solvers, for instance for
combinatorial optimizations problems that have a lot of symmetry. Finally, we
prove some general lower bounds showing that in the worst case, the complexity
of every quantum LP-solver (and hence also SDP-solver) has to scale linearly
with when , which is the same as classical.Comment: v4: 69 pages, small corrections and clarifications. This version will
appear in Quantu
Negative weights make adversaries stronger
The quantum adversary method is one of the most successful techniques for
proving lower bounds on quantum query complexity. It gives optimal lower bounds
for many problems, has application to classical complexity in formula size
lower bounds, and is versatile with equivalent formulations in terms of weight
schemes, eigenvalues, and Kolmogorov complexity. All these formulations rely on
the principle that if an algorithm successfully computes a function then, in
particular, it is able to distinguish between inputs which map to different
values.
We present a stronger version of the adversary method which goes beyond this
principle to make explicit use of the stronger condition that the algorithm
actually computes the function. This new method, which we call ADV+-, has all
the advantages of the old: it is a lower bound on bounded-error quantum query
complexity, its square is a lower bound on formula size, and it behaves well
with respect to function composition. Moreover ADV+- is always at least as
large as the adversary method ADV, and we show an example of a monotone
function for which ADV+-(f)=Omega(ADV(f)^1.098). We also give examples showing
that ADV+- does not face limitations of ADV like the certificate complexity
barrier and the property testing barrier.Comment: 29 pages, v2: added automorphism principle, extended to non-boolean
functions, simplified examples, added matching upper bound for AD
- …