Optimal Index Codes via a Duality between Index Coding and Network Coding

In Index Coding, the goal is to use a broadcast channel as efficiently as possible to communicate information from a source to multiple receivers which can possess some of the information symbols at the source as side-information. In this work, we present a duality relationship between index coding (IC) and multiple-unicast network coding (NC). It is known that the IC problem can be represented using a side-information graph $G$ (with number of vertices $n$ equal to the number of source symbols). The size of the maximum acyclic induced subgraph, denoted by $MAIS$ is a lower bound on the \textit{broadcast rate}. For IC problems with $MAIS=n-1$ and $MAIS=n-2$, prior work has shown that binary (over ${\mathbb F}_2$) linear index codes achieve the $MAIS$ lower bound for the broadcast rate and thus are optimal. In this work, we use the the duality relationship between NC and IC to show that for a class of IC problems with $MAIS=n-3$, binary linear index codes achieve the $MAIS$ lower bound on the broadcast rate. In contrast, it is known that there exists IC problems with $MAIS=n-3$ and optimal broadcast rate strictly greater than $MAIS$

Communication Algorithms with Advice

We study the amount of knowledge about a communication network that must be given to its nodes in order to efficiently disseminate information. Our approach is quantitative: we investigate the minimum total number of bits of information (minimum size of advice) that has to be available to nodes, regardless of the type of information provided. We compare the size of advice needed to perform broadcast and wakeup (the latter is a broadcast in which nodes can transmit only after getting the source information), both using a linear number of messages (which is optimal). We show that the minimum size of advice permitting the wakeup with a linear number of messages in a n-node network, is Θ(nlog n), while the broadcast with a linear number of messages can be achieved with advice of size O(n). We also show that the latter size of advice is almost optimal: no advice of size o(n) can permit to broadcast with a linear number of messages. Thus a