Foundations of Human-Aware Planning -- A Tale of Three Models

abstract: A critical challenge in the design of AI systems that operate with humans in the loop is to be able to model the intentions and capabilities of the humans, as well as their beliefs and expectations of the AI system itself. This allows the AI system to be "human- aware" -- i.e. the human task model enables it to envisage desired roles of the human in joint action, while the human mental model allows it to anticipate how its own actions are perceived from the point of view of the human. In my research, I explore how these concepts of human-awareness manifest themselves in the scope of planning or sequential decision making with humans in the loop. To this end, I will show (1) how the AI agent can leverage the human task model to generate symbiotic behavior; and (2) how the introduction of the human mental model in the deliberative process of the AI agent allows it to generate explanations for a plan or resort to explicable plans when explanations are not desired. The latter is in addition to traditional notions of human-aware planning which typically use the human task model alone and thus enables a new suite of capabilities of a human-aware AI agent. Finally, I will explore how the AI agent can leverage emerging mixed-reality interfaces to realize effective channels of communication with the human in the loop.Dissertation/ThesisDoctoral Dissertation Computer Science 201

Deep Learning, transparency and trust in Human Robot Teamwork

For Autonomous AI systems to be accepted and trusted, the users should be able to understand the reasoning process of the system (i.e., the system should be transparent). Robotics presents unique programming difficulties in that systems need to map from complicated sensor inputs such as camera feeds and laser scans to outputs such as joint angles and velocities. Advances in Deep Neural Networks are now making it possible to replace laborious handcrafted features and control code by learning control policies directly from high dimensional sensor inputs. Because Atari games, where these capabilities were first demonstrated, replicate the robotics problem they are ideal for investigating how humans might come to understand and interact with agents who have not been explicitly programmed. We present computational and human results for making DRLN more transparent using object saliency visualizations of internal states and test the effectiveness of expressing saliency through teleological verbal explanations

Finding AI Faces in the Moon and Armies in the Clouds : Anthropomorphizing Artificial Intelligence in Military Human-Machine Interactions

Open Access via the T&F AgreementPeer reviewedPublisher PD

KR3^3: An Architecture for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Robotics

This paper describes an architecture that combines the complementary strengths of declarative programming and probabilistic graphical models to enable robots to represent, reason with, and learn from, qualitative and quantitative descriptions of uncertainty and knowledge. An action language is used for the low-level (LL) and high-level (HL) system descriptions in the architecture, and the definition of recorded histories in the HL is expanded to allow prioritized defaults. For any given goal, tentative plans created in the HL using default knowledge and commonsense reasoning are implemented in the LL using probabilistic algorithms, with the corresponding observations used to update the HL history. Tight coupling between the two levels enables automatic selection of relevant variables and generation of suitable action policies in the LL for each HL action, and supports reasoning with violation of defaults, noisy observations and unreliable actions in large and complex domains. The architecture is evaluated in simulation and on physical robots transporting objects in indoor domains; the benefit on robots is a reduction in task execution time of 39% compared with a purely probabilistic, but still hierarchical, approach.Comment: The paper appears in the Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014