7 research outputs found
Finite-Blocklength Bounds for Wiretap Channels
This paper investigates the maximal secrecy rate over a wiretap channel
subject to reliability and secrecy constraints at a given blocklength. New
achievability and converse bounds are derived, which are shown to be tighter
than existing bounds. The bounds also lead to the tightest second-order coding
rate for discrete memoryless and Gaussian wiretap channels.Comment: extended version of a paper submitted to ISIT 201
Wiretap and Gelfand-Pinsker Channels Analogy and its Applications
An analogy framework between wiretap channels (WTCs) and state-dependent
point-to-point channels with non-causal encoder channel state information
(referred to as Gelfand-Pinker channels (GPCs)) is proposed. A good sequence of
stealth-wiretap codes is shown to induce a good sequence of codes for a
corresponding GPC. Consequently, the framework enables exploiting existing
results for GPCs to produce converse proofs for their wiretap analogs. The
analogy readily extends to multiuser broadcasting scenarios, encompassing
broadcast channels (BCs) with deterministic components, degradation ordering
between users, and BCs with cooperative receivers. Given a wiretap BC (WTBC)
with two receivers and one eavesdropper, an analogous Gelfand-Pinsker BC (GPBC)
is constructed by converting the eavesdropper's observation sequence into a
state sequence with an appropriate product distribution (induced by the
stealth-wiretap code for the WTBC), and non-causally revealing the states to
the encoder. The transition matrix of the state-dependent GPBC is extracted
from WTBC's transition law, with the eavesdropper's output playing the role of
the channel state. Past capacity results for the semi-deterministic (SD) GPBC
and the physically-degraded (PD) GPBC with an informed receiver are leveraged
to furnish analogy-based converse proofs for the analogous WTBC setups. This
characterizes the secrecy-capacity regions of the SD-WTBC and the PD-WTBC, in
which the stronger receiver also observes the eavesdropper's channel output.
These derivations exemplify how the wiretap-GP analogy enables translating
results on one problem into advances in the study of the other