566 research outputs found
One Quantifier Alternation in First-Order Logic with Modular Predicates
Adding modular predicates yields a generalization of first-order logic FO
over words. The expressive power of FO[<,MOD] with order comparison and
predicates for has been investigated by Barrington,
Compton, Straubing and Therien. The study of FO[<,MOD]-fragments was initiated
by Chaubard, Pin and Straubing. More recently, Dartois and Paperman showed that
definability in the two-variable fragment FO2[<,MOD] is decidable. In this
paper we continue this line of work.
We give an effective algebraic characterization of the word languages in
Sigma2[<,MOD]. The fragment Sigma2 consists of first-order formulas in prenex
normal form with two blocks of quantifiers starting with an existential block.
In addition we show that Delta2[<,MOD], the largest subclass of Sigma2[<,MOD]
which is closed under negation, has the same expressive power as two-variable
logic FO2[<,MOD]. This generalizes the result FO2[<] = Delta2[<] of Therien and
Wilke to modular predicates. As a byproduct, we obtain another decidable
characterization of FO2[<,MOD]
Adding modular predicates to first-order fragments
We investigate the decidability of the definability problem for fragments of
first order logic over finite words enriched with modular predicates. Our
approach aims toward the most generic statements that we could achieve, which
successfully covers the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first order logic
and some of its fragments. We obtain that deciding this problem for each level
of the alternation hierarchy of both first order logic and its two-variable
fragment when equipped with all regular numerical predicates is not harder than
deciding it for the corresponding level equipped with only the linear order and
the successor. For two-variable fragments we also treat the case of the
signature containing only the order and modular predicates.Relying on some
recent results, this proves the decidability for each level of the alternation
hierarchy of the two-variable first order fragmentwhile in the case of the
first order logic the question remains open for levels greater than two.The
main ingredients of the proofs are syntactic transformations of first order
formulas as well as the algebraic framework of finite categories
Covering and separation for logical fragments with modular predicates
For every class of word languages, one may associate a decision
problem called -separation. Given two regular languages, it asks
whether there exists a third language in containing the first
language, while being disjoint from the second one. Usually, finding an
algorithm deciding -separation yields a deep insight on
.
We consider classes defined by fragments of first-order logic. Given such a
fragment, one may often build a larger class by adding more predicates to its
signature. In the paper, we investigate the operation of enriching signatures
with modular predicates. Our main theorem is a generic transfer result for this
construction. Informally, we show that when a logical fragment is equipped with
a signature containing the successor predicate, separation for the stronger
logic enriched with modular predicates reduces to separation for the original
logic. This result actually applies to a more general decision problem, called
the covering problem
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
Languages of Dot-depth One over Infinite Words
Over finite words, languages of dot-depth one are expressively complete for
alternation-free first-order logic. This fragment is also known as the Boolean
closure of existential first-order logic. Here, the atomic formulas comprise
order, successor, minimum, and maximum predicates. Knast (1983) has shown that
it is decidable whether a language has dot-depth one. We extend Knast's result
to infinite words. In particular, we describe the class of languages definable
in alternation-free first-order logic over infinite words, and we give an
effective characterization of this fragment. This characterization has two
components. The first component is identical to Knast's algebraic property for
finite words and the second component is a topological property, namely being a
Boolean combination of Cantor sets.
As an intermediate step we consider finite and infinite words simultaneously.
We then obtain the results for infinite words as well as for finite words as
special cases. In particular, we give a new proof of Knast's Theorem on
languages of dot-depth one over finite words.Comment: Presented at LICS 201
- …