Voting-Based Consensus of Data Partitions

Over the past few years, there has been a renewed interest in the consensus problem for ensembles of partitions. Recent work is primarily motivated by the developments in the area of combining multiple supervised learners. Unlike the consensus of supervised classifications, the consensus of data partitions is a challenging problem due to the lack of globally defined cluster labels and to the inherent difficulty of data clustering as an unsupervised learning problem. Moreover, the true number of clusters may be unknown. A fundamental goal of consensus methods for partitions is to obtain an optimal summary of an ensemble and to discover a cluster structure with accuracy and robustness exceeding those of the individual ensemble partitions. The quality of the consensus partitions highly depends on the ensemble generation mechanism and on the suitability of the consensus method for combining the generated ensemble. Typically, consensus methods derive an ensemble representation that is used as the basis for extracting the consensus partition. Most ensemble representations circumvent the labeling problem. On the other hand, voting-based methods establish direct parallels with consensus methods for supervised classifications, by seeking an optimal relabeling of the ensemble partitions and deriving an ensemble representation consisting of a central aggregated partition. An important element of the voting-based aggregation problem is the pairwise relabeling of an ensemble partition with respect to a representative partition of the ensemble, which is refered to here as the voting problem. The voting problem is commonly formulated as a weighted bipartite matching problem. In this dissertation, a general theoretical framework for the voting problem as a multi-response regression problem is proposed. The problem is formulated as seeking to estimate the uncertainties associated with the assignments of the objects to the representative clusters, given their assignments to the clusters of an ensemble partition. A new voting scheme, referred to as cumulative voting, is derived as a special instance of the proposed regression formulation corresponding to fitting a linear model by least squares estimation. The proposed formulation reveals the close relationships between the underlying loss functions of the cumulative voting and bipartite matching schemes. A useful feature of the proposed framework is that it can be applied to model substantial variability between partitions, such as a variable number of clusters. A general aggregation algorithm with variants corresponding to cumulative voting and bipartite matching is applied and a simulation-based analysis is presented to compare the suitability of each scheme to different ensemble generation mechanisms. The bipartite matching is found to be more suitable than cumulative voting for a particular generation model, whereby each ensemble partition is generated as a noisy permutation of an underlying labeling, according to a probability of error. For ensembles with a variable number of clusters, it is proposed that the aggregated partition be viewed as an estimated distributional representation of the ensemble, on the basis of which, a criterion may be defined to seek an optimally compressed consensus partition. The properties and features of the proposed cumulative voting scheme are studied. In particular, the relationship between cumulative voting and the well-known co-association matrix is highlighted. Furthermore, an adaptive aggregation algorithm that is suited for the cumulative voting scheme is proposed. The algorithm aims at selecting the initial reference partition and the aggregation sequence of the ensemble partitions the loss of mutual information associated with the aggregated partition is minimized. In order to subsequently extract the final consensus partition, an efficient agglomerative algorithm is developed. The algorithm merges the aggregated clusters such that the maximum amount of information is preserved. Furthermore, it allows the optimal number of consensus clusters to be estimated. An empirical study using several artificial and real-world datasets demonstrates that the proposed cumulative voting scheme leads to discovering substantially more accurate consensus partitions compared to bipartite matching, in the case of ensembles with a relatively large or a variable number of clusters. Compared to other recent consensus methods, the proposed method is found to be comparable with or better than the best performing methods. Moreover, accurate estimates of the true number of clusters are often achieved using cumulative voting, whereas consistently poor estimates are achieved based on bipartite matching. The empirical evidence demonstrates that the bipartite matching scheme is not suitable for these types of ensembles

EC3: Combining Clustering and Classification for Ensemble Learning

Classification and clustering algorithms have been proved to be successful individually in different contexts. Both of them have their own advantages and limitations. For instance, although classification algorithms are more powerful than clustering methods in predicting class labels of objects, they do not perform well when there is a lack of sufficient manually labeled reliable data. On the other hand, although clustering algorithms do not produce label information for objects, they provide supplementary constraints (e.g., if two objects are clustered together, it is more likely that the same label is assigned to both of them) that one can leverage for label prediction of a set of unknown objects. Therefore, systematic utilization of both these types of algorithms together can lead to better prediction performance. In this paper, We propose a novel algorithm, called EC3 that merges classification and clustering together in order to support both binary and multi-class classification. EC3 is based on a principled combination of multiple classification and multiple clustering methods using an optimization function. We theoretically show the convexity and optimality of the problem and solve it by block coordinate descent method. We additionally propose iEC3, a variant of EC3 that handles imbalanced training data. We perform an extensive experimental analysis by comparing EC3 and iEC3 with 14 baseline methods (7 well-known standalone classifiers, 5 ensemble classifiers, and 2 existing methods that merge classification and clustering) on 13 standard benchmark datasets. We show that our methods outperform other baselines for every single dataset, achieving at most 10% higher AUC. Moreover our methods are faster (1.21 times faster than the best baseline), more resilient to noise and class imbalance than the best baseline method.Comment: 14 pages, 7 figures, 11 table

Multilabel Consensus Classification

In the era of big data, a large amount of noisy and incomplete data can be collected from multiple sources for prediction tasks. Combining multiple models or data sources helps to counteract the effects of low data quality and the bias of any single model or data source, and thus can improve the robustness and the performance of predictive models. Out of privacy, storage and bandwidth considerations, in certain circumstances one has to combine the predictions from multiple models or data sources to obtain the final predictions without accessing the raw data. Consensus-based prediction combination algorithms are effective for such situations. However, current research on prediction combination focuses on the single label setting, where an instance can have one and only one label. Nonetheless, data nowadays are usually multilabeled, such that more than one label have to be predicted at the same time. Direct applications of existing prediction combination methods to multilabel settings can lead to degenerated performance. In this paper, we address the challenges of combining predictions from multiple multilabel classifiers and propose two novel algorithms, MLCM-r (MultiLabel Consensus Maximization for ranking) and MLCM-a (MLCM for microAUC). These algorithms can capture label correlations that are common in multilabel classifications, and optimize corresponding performance metrics. Experimental results on popular multilabel classification tasks verify the theoretical analysis and effectiveness of the proposed methods