6,016 research outputs found
Symmetry reduction and heuristic search for error detection in model checking
The state explosion problem is the main limitation of model checking. Symmetries in the system being verified can be exploited in order to avoid this problem by defining an equivalence (symmetry) relation on the states of the system, which induces a semantically equivalent quotient system of smaller size. On the other hand, heuristic search algorithms can be applied to improve the bug finding capabilities of model checking. Such algorithms use
heuristic functions to guide the exploration. Bestfirst
is used for accelerating the search, while A* guarantees optimal error trails if combined with admissible estimates. We analyze some aspects of combining both approaches, concentrating on the problem of finding the optimal path to the equivalence class of a given error state. Experimental
results evaluate our approach
Algorithms for Approximate Minimization of the Difference Between Submodular Functions, with Applications
We extend the work of Narasimhan and Bilmes [30] for minimizing set functions
representable as a difference between submodular functions. Similar to [30],
our new algorithms are guaranteed to monotonically reduce the objective
function at every step. We empirically and theoretically show that the
per-iteration cost of our algorithms is much less than [30], and our algorithms
can be used to efficiently minimize a difference between submodular functions
under various combinatorial constraints, a problem not previously addressed. We
provide computational bounds and a hardness result on the mul- tiplicative
inapproximability of minimizing the difference between submodular functions. We
show, however, that it is possible to give worst-case additive bounds by
providing a polynomial time computable lower-bound on the minima. Finally we
show how a number of machine learning problems can be modeled as minimizing the
difference between submodular functions. We experimentally show the validity of
our algorithms by testing them on the problem of feature selection with
submodular cost features.Comment: 17 pages, 8 figures. A shorter version of this appeared in Proc.
Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), Catalina Islands, 201
Non-monotone Submodular Maximization with Nearly Optimal Adaptivity and Query Complexity
Submodular maximization is a general optimization problem with a wide range
of applications in machine learning (e.g., active learning, clustering, and
feature selection). In large-scale optimization, the parallel running time of
an algorithm is governed by its adaptivity, which measures the number of
sequential rounds needed if the algorithm can execute polynomially-many
independent oracle queries in parallel. While low adaptivity is ideal, it is
not sufficient for an algorithm to be efficient in practice---there are many
applications of distributed submodular optimization where the number of
function evaluations becomes prohibitively expensive. Motivated by these
applications, we study the adaptivity and query complexity of submodular
maximization. In this paper, we give the first constant-factor approximation
algorithm for maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a
cardinality constraint that runs in adaptive rounds and makes
oracle queries in expectation. In our empirical study, we use
three real-world applications to compare our algorithm with several benchmarks
for non-monotone submodular maximization. The results demonstrate that our
algorithm finds competitive solutions using significantly fewer rounds and
queries.Comment: 12 pages, 8 figure
- ā¦