6 research outputs found
Multicast Network Design Game on a Ring
In this paper we study quality measures of different solution concepts for
the multicast network design game on a ring topology. We recall from the
literature a lower bound of 4/3 and prove a matching upper bound for the price
of stability, which is the ratio of the social costs of a best Nash equilibrium
and of a general optimum. Therefore, we answer an open question posed by
Fanelli et al. in [12]. We prove an upper bound of 2 for the ratio of the costs
of a potential optimizer and of an optimum, provide a construction of a lower
bound, and give a computer-assisted argument that it reaches for any
precision. We then turn our attention to players arriving one by one and
playing myopically their best response. We provide matching lower and upper
bounds of 2 for the myopic sequential price of anarchy (achieved for a
worst-case order of the arrival of the players). We then initiate the study of
myopic sequential price of stability and for the multicast game on the ring we
construct a lower bound of 4/3, and provide an upper bound of 26/19. To the
end, we conjecture and argue that the right answer is 4/3.Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure
The Quality of Equilibria for Set Packing Games
We introduce set packing games as an abstraction of situations in which
selfish players select subsets of a finite set of indivisible items, and
analyze the quality of several equilibria for this class of games. Assuming
that players are able to approximately play equilibrium strategies, we show
that the total quality of the resulting equilibrium solutions is only
moderately suboptimal. Our results are tight bounds on the price of anarchy for
three equilibrium concepts, namely Nash equilibria, subgame perfect equilibria,
and an equilibrium concept that we refer to as -collusion Nash equilibrium
The sequential price of anarchy for atomic congestion games
In situations without central coordination, the price of anarchy relates the quality of any Nash equilibrium to the quality of a global optimum. Instead of assuming that all players choose their actions simultaneously, here we consider games where players choose their actions sequentially. The sequential price of anarchy, recently introduced by Paes Leme, Syrgkanis, and Tardos then relates the quality of any subgame perfect equilibrium to the quality of a global optimum. The effect of sequential decision making on the quality of equilibria, however, depends on the specific game under consideration.\ud
Here we analyze the sequential price of anarchy for atomic congestion games with affine cost functions. We derive several lower and upper bounds, showing that sequential decisions mitigate the worst case outcomes known for the classical price of anarchy. Next to tight bounds on the sequential price of anarchy, a methodological contribution of our work is, among other things, a "factor revealing" integer linear programming approach that we use to solve the case of three players