4 research outputs found
Closed-Loop Behavior of an Autonomous Helicopter Equipped with a Robotic Arm for Aerial Manipulation Tasks
This paper is devoted to the control of aerial robots interacting physically with objects in the environment and
with other aerial robots. The paper presents a controller for the particular case of a small‐scaled autonomous helicopter equipped with a robotic arm for aerial manipulation.
Two
types
of
influences
are
imposed
on
the
helicopter
from
a
manipulator:
coherent
and
non
‐
coherent
influence.
In
the
former
case,
the
forces
and
torques
imposed
on
the
helicopter
by
the
manipulator
change
with
frequencies
close
to
those
of
the
helicopter
movement.
The
paper
shows
that
even
small
interaction
forces
imposed
on
the
fuselage
periodically
in
proper
phase
could
yield
to
low
frequency
instabilities
and
oscillations,
so
called
phase
circle
Accepted for publication in the Journal of Robotic Systems. On the Kinematics of Multiple Manipulator Space Free-Flyers and their Computation
Abstract. In this paper, two basic approaches for kinematics modelling of multiple manipulator Space Free-Flying Robots (SFFRs) are developed. In the barycentric vector approach, the center of mass of the whole system is taken as a representative point for the system’s translational motion, and a set of body-fixed vectors which reflect both geometric configuration and mass distribution of the system are used. On the other hand, the direct path method relies on taking a point on the base body (preferably its center of mass) as the representative point for the system’s translational motion. The consequences of using each of the two approaches in deriving dynamics equations and in control design of SFFRs are discussed. It is revealed that the direct path method is a more appropriate approach for modelling multiple arm systems, in the presence of external forces/torques (i.e. free-flying mode). A fourteen degree-of-freedom space free-flying system is considered as a benchmark system and a quantitative comparison between the two approaches is presented. The results show that the direct path method requires significantly less computations for position and velocity analyses. 1 I