Dysfunctional breathing: its parameters, measurement and relevance

Background The commonly held idea that 'proper' breathing is important for health is generally accompanied by the view that incorrect or 'dysfunctional' breathing has adverse effects on health. It has been proposed that correction of dysfunctional breathing through breathing therapy reduces symptoms and improves the health of patients with conditions such as asthma , anxiety, speech disorders, chronic muscular skeletal dysfunction and medically unexplained physical symptoms. However , investigation of the impact of dysfunctional breathing and breathing therapies is hampered by the fact that dysfunctional breathing is not well defined and that there are few validated measures or standard ized protocols to measure it. Aims The four main objectives of the experimental portion of thesis are: • To further develop and validate some clinical tools for assessment of dysfunctional breathing; • To explore and evaluate current methods for assessing dysfunctional breathing particularly those used by breathing therapists; • To investigate the relationships between measures of dysfunctional breathing with a view to understanding the possible definitions and dimensions of dysfunctional breathing; and • To explore possible mechanisms of breathing therapy. Method A series of seven studies were untaken. Various non-experimental and quasi-experimental study designs were used These papers, which are all published (or in press) manuscripts, form the experimenta l portion of this thesis. The seven studies presented in the empirical section of this thesis are grouped in four sub-sections - The first of these contains two studies on the topic of 'Measuring Breathing Pattern', the second contains one study on the topic 'Evaluating Dysfunctional Breathing Symptoms', the third include two studies that investigate 'Relationships between Measures of Breathing Functionality' and the final sub-section contains two studies that explores 'Measures of Dysfunctional Breathing and Breathing Therapy'. Results/Discussion Manual techniques for evaluating breathing pattern appear to be useful and reasonably accurate for evaluating thoracic dominant breathing and paradoxical breathing. The Self Evaluation of Breathing Quest ionnaire appears to have two dimensions that might be related to biochemical and biomechanical aspects of breathing dysfunction. Poor relationships between different categories of measures of dysfunctional breathing suggest that dysfunctional breathing has several dimensions. Breathing pattern appears to moderate dyspnea and altering breathing pattern may be one mechanism of breathing therapy. Conclusion While dysfunctional breathing cannot be strictly defined at present, for practical purposes dysfunctional breathing is probably best characterized as multidimensional. Dysfunctional breathing can occur in at least three dimensions: biochemical, breathing pattern and breathing related symptoms and these might not co-exist.  Comprehensive measurement of dysfunctional breathing should include measures that evaluate all these dimensions. The therapeutic mechanisms of breathing theory are likely to be comple x and include psychological, biomechanical and physiological parameters. However, dysfunctional patterns of breathing are one factor that influences patients' response to breathing therapy. Also correction of dysfunctional breathing patterns is one likely therapeutic pathway of breathing therapy, particularly for patients with dyspnea