77,208 research outputs found
Answer Sets for Logic Programs with Arbitrary Abstract Constraint Atoms
In this paper, we present two alternative approaches to defining answer sets
for logic programs with arbitrary types of abstract constraint atoms (c-atoms).
These approaches generalize the fixpoint-based and the level mapping based
answer set semantics of normal logic programs to the case of logic programs
with arbitrary types of c-atoms. The results are four different answer set
definitions which are equivalent when applied to normal logic programs. The
standard fixpoint-based semantics of logic programs is generalized in two
directions, called answer set by reduct and answer set by complement. These
definitions, which differ from each other in the treatment of
negation-as-failure (naf) atoms, make use of an immediate consequence operator
to perform answer set checking, whose definition relies on the notion of
conditional satisfaction of c-atoms w.r.t. a pair of interpretations. The other
two definitions, called strongly and weakly well-supported models, are
generalizations of the notion of well-supported models of normal logic programs
to the case of programs with c-atoms. As for the case of fixpoint-based
semantics, the difference between these two definitions is rooted in the
treatment of naf atoms. We prove that answer sets by reduct (resp. by
complement) are equivalent to weakly (resp. strongly) well-supported models of
a program, thus generalizing the theorem on the correspondence between stable
models and well-supported models of a normal logic program to the class of
programs with c-atoms. We show that the newly defined semantics coincide with
previously introduced semantics for logic programs with monotone c-atoms, and
they extend the original answer set semantics of normal logic programs. We also
study some properties of answer sets of programs with c-atoms, and relate our
definitions to several semantics for logic programs with aggregates presented
in the literature
Decidability of the Clark's Completion Semantics for Monadic Programs and Queries
There are many different semantics for general logic programs (i.e. programs
that use negation in the bodies of clauses). Most of these semantics are Turing
complete (in a sense that can be made precise), implying that they are
undecidable. To obtain decidability one needs to put additional restrictions on
programs and queries. In logic programming it is natural to put restrictions on
the underlying first-order language. In this note we show the decidability of
the Clark's completion semantics for monadic general programs and queries.
To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP
Relating Weight Constraint and Aggregate Programs: Semantics and Representation
Weight constraint and aggregate programs are among the most widely used logic
programs with constraints. In this paper, we relate the semantics of these two
classes of programs, namely the stable model semantics for weight constraint
programs and the answer set semantics based on conditional satisfaction for
aggregate programs. Both classes of programs are instances of logic programs
with constraints, and in particular, the answer set semantics for aggregate
programs can be applied to weight constraint programs. We show that the two
semantics are closely related. First, we show that for a broad class of weight
constraint programs, called strongly satisfiable programs, the two semantics
coincide. When they disagree, a stable model admitted by the stable model
semantics may be circularly justified. We show that the gap between the two
semantics can be closed by transforming a weight constraint program to a
strongly satisfiable one, so that no circular models may be generated under the
current implementation of the stable model semantics. We further demonstrate
the close relationship between the two semantics by formulating a
transformation from weight constraint programs to logic programs with nested
expressions which preserves the answer set semantics. Our study on the
semantics leads to an investigation of a methodological issue, namely the
possibility of compact representation of aggregate programs by weight
constraint programs. We show that almost all standard aggregates can be encoded
by weight constraints compactly. This makes it possible to compute the answer
sets of aggregate programs using the ASP solvers for weight constraint
programs. This approach is compared experimentally with the ones where
aggregates are handled more explicitly, which show that the weight constraint
encoding of aggregates enables a competitive approach to answer set computation
for aggregate programs.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), 2011.
30 page
Bialgebraic Semantics for Logic Programming
Bialgebrae provide an abstract framework encompassing the semantics of
different kinds of computational models. In this paper we propose a bialgebraic
approach to the semantics of logic programming. Our methodology is to study
logic programs as reactive systems and exploit abstract techniques developed in
that setting. First we use saturation to model the operational semantics of
logic programs as coalgebrae on presheaves. Then, we make explicit the
underlying algebraic structure by using bialgebrae on presheaves. The resulting
semantics turns out to be compositional with respect to conjunction and term
substitution. Also, it encodes a parallel model of computation, whose soundness
is guaranteed by a built-in notion of synchronisation between different
threads
Semantics of Input-Consuming Logic Programs
Input-consuming programs are logic programs with an additional restriction on the selectability (actually, on the resolvability) of atoms. this class of programs arguably allows to model logic programs employing a dynamic selection rule and constructs such as delay declarations: as shown also in [5], a large number of them are actually input-consuming. \ud
in this paper we show that - under some syntactic restrictions - the tex2html_wrap_inline117-semantics of a program is correct and fully abstract also for input-consuming programs. this allows us to conclude that for a large class of programs employing delay declarations there exists a model-theoretic semantics which is equivalent to the operational one
An Effective Fixpoint Semantics for Linear Logic Programs
In this paper we investigate the theoretical foundation of a new bottom-up
semantics for linear logic programs, and more precisely for the fragment of
LinLog that consists of the language LO enriched with the constant 1. We use
constraints to symbolically and finitely represent possibly infinite
collections of provable goals. We define a fixpoint semantics based on a new
operator in the style of Tp working over constraints. An application of the
fixpoint operator can be computed algorithmically. As sufficient conditions for
termination, we show that the fixpoint computation is guaranteed to converge
for propositional LO. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to define an
effective fixpoint semantics for linear logic programs. As an application of
our framework, we also present a formal investigation of the relations between
LO and Disjunctive Logic Programming. Using an approach based on abstract
interpretation, we show that DLP fixpoint semantics can be viewed as an
abstraction of our semantics for LO. We prove that the resulting abstraction is
correct and complete for an interesting class of LO programs encoding Petri
Nets.Comment: 39 pages, 5 figures. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic
Programmin
- …