2 research outputs found

    On the Complexity of Planar Covering of Small Graphs

    Full text link
    The problem Cover(H) asks whether an input graph G covers a fixed graph H (i.e., whether there exists a homomorphism G to H which locally preserves the structure of the graphs). Complexity of this problem has been intensively studied. In this paper, we consider the problem PlanarCover(H) which restricts the input graph G to be planar. PlanarCover(H) is polynomially solvable if Cover(H) belongs to P, and it is even trivially solvable if H has no planar cover. Thus the interesting cases are when H admits a planar cover, but Cover(H) is NP-complete. This also relates the problem to the long-standing Negami Conjecture which aims to describe all graphs having a planar cover. Kratochvil asked whether there are non-trivial graphs for which Cover(H) is NP-complete but PlanarCover(H) belongs to P. We examine the first nontrivial cases of graphs H for which Cover(H) is NP-complete and which admit a planar cover. We prove NP-completeness of PlanarCover(H) in these cases.Comment: Full version (including Appendix) of a paper from the conference WG 201

    3-connected Reduction for Regular Graph Covers

    Full text link
    A graph GG covers a graph HH if there exists a locally bijective homomorphism from GG to HH. We deal with regular coverings in which this homomorphism is prescribed by an action of a semiregular subgroup Γ\Gamma of Aut(G)\textrm{Aut}(G); so H≅G/ΓH \cong G / \Gamma. In this paper, we study the behaviour of regular graph covering with respect to 1-cuts and 2-cuts in GG. We describe reductions which produce a series of graphs G=G0,…,GrG = G_0,\dots,G_r such that Gi+1G_{i+1} is created from GiG_i by replacing certain inclusion minimal subgraphs with colored edges. The process ends with a primitive graph GrG_r which is either 3-connected, or a cycle, or K2K_2. This reduction can be viewed as a non-trivial modification of reductions of Mac Lane (1937), Trachtenbrot (1958), Tutte (1966), Hopcroft and Tarjan (1973), Cuningham and Edmonds (1980), Walsh (1982), and others. A novel feature of our approach is that in each step all essential information about symmetries of GG are preserved. A regular covering projection G0→H0G_0\to H_0 induces regular covering projections Gi→HiG_i \to H_i where HiH_i is the ii-th quotient reduction of H0H_0. This property allows to construct all possible quotients H0H_0 of G0G_0 from the possible quotients HrH_r of GrG_r. By applying this method to planar graphs, we give a proof of Negami's Theorem (1988). Our structural results are also used in subsequent papers for regular covering testing when GG is a planar graph and for an inductive characterization of the automorphism groups of planar graphs (see Babai (1973) as well).Comment: The journal version of the first part of arXiv:1402.377
    corecore