15,280 research outputs found

    On the density of sets of the Euclidean plane avoiding distance 1

    Full text link
    A subset AR2A \subset \mathbb R^2 is said to avoid distance 11 if: x,yA,xy21.\forall x,y \in A, \left\| x-y \right\|_2 \neq 1. In this paper we study the number m1(R2)m_1(\mathbb R^2) which is the supremum of the upper densities of measurable sets avoiding distance 1 in the Euclidean plane. Intuitively, m1(R2)m_1(\mathbb R^2) represents the highest proportion of the plane that can be filled by a set avoiding distance 1. This parameter is related to the fractional chromatic number χf(R2)\chi_f(\mathbb R^2) of the plane. We establish that m1(R2)0.25646m_1(\mathbb R^2) \leq 0.25646 and χf(R2)3.8992\chi_f(\mathbb R^2) \geq 3.8992.Comment: 11 pages, 5 figure

    Deterministic Distributed Edge-Coloring via Hypergraph Maximal Matching

    Full text link
    We present a deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a (2Δ1)(2\Delta-1)-edge-coloring, or even list-edge-coloring, in any nn-node graph with maximum degree Δ\Delta, in O(log7Δlogn)O(\log^7 \Delta \log n) rounds. This answers one of the long-standing open questions of \emph{distributed graph algorithms} from the late 1980s, which asked for a polylogarithmic-time algorithm. See, e.g., Open Problem 4 in the Distributed Graph Coloring book of Barenboim and Elkin. The previous best round complexities were 2O(logn)2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})} by Panconesi and Srinivasan [STOC'92] and O~(Δ)+O(logn)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\Delta}) + O(\log^* n) by Fraigniaud, Heinrich, and Kosowski [FOCS'16]. A corollary of our deterministic list-edge-coloring also improves the randomized complexity of (2Δ1)(2\Delta-1)-edge-coloring to poly(loglogn)(\log\log n) rounds. The key technical ingredient is a deterministic distributed algorithm for \emph{hypergraph maximal matching}, which we believe will be of interest beyond this result. In any hypergraph of rank rr --- where each hyperedge has at most rr vertices --- with nn nodes and maximum degree Δ\Delta, this algorithm computes a maximal matching in O(r5log6+logrΔlogn)O(r^5 \log^{6+\log r } \Delta \log n) rounds. This hypergraph matching algorithm and its extensions lead to a number of other results. In particular, a polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed maximal independent set algorithm for graphs with bounded neighborhood independence, hence answering Open Problem 5 of Barenboim and Elkin's book, a ((logΔ/ε)O(log(1/ε)))((\log \Delta/\varepsilon)^{O(\log (1/\varepsilon))})-round deterministic algorithm for (1+ε)(1+\varepsilon)-approximation of maximum matching, and a quasi-polylogarithmic-time deterministic distributed algorithm for orienting λ\lambda-arboricity graphs with out-degree at most (1+ε)λ(1+\varepsilon)\lambda, for any constant ε>0\varepsilon>0, hence partially answering Open Problem 10 of Barenboim and Elkin's book

    The Fractional Chromatic Number of the Plane

    Full text link
    The chromatic number of the plane is the chromatic number of the uncountably infinite graph that has as its vertices the points of the plane and has an edge between two points if their distance is 1. This chromatic number is denoted χ(R2)\chi(\mathcal{R}^2). The problem was introduced in 1950, and shortly thereafter it was proved that 4χ(R2)74\le \chi(\mathcal{R}^2)\le 7. These bounds are both easy to prove, but after more than 60 years they are still the best known. In this paper, we investigate χf(R2)\chi_f(\mathcal{R}^2), the fractional chromatic number of the plane. The previous best bounds (rounded to five decimal places) were 3.5556χf(R2)4.35993.5556 \le \chi_f(\mathcal{R}^2)\le 4.3599. Here we improve the lower bound to 76/213.619076/21\approx3.6190.Comment: 20 pages, 10 figure

    Distributed local approximation algorithms for maximum matching in graphs and hypergraphs

    Full text link
    We describe approximation algorithms in Linial's classic LOCAL model of distributed computing to find maximum-weight matchings in a hypergraph of rank rr. Our main result is a deterministic algorithm to generate a matching which is an O(r)O(r)-approximation to the maximum weight matching, running in O~(rlogΔ+log2Δ+logn)\tilde O(r \log \Delta + \log^2 \Delta + \log^* n) rounds. (Here, the O~()\tilde O() notations hides polyloglog Δ\text{polyloglog } \Delta and polylog r\text{polylog } r factors). This is based on a number of new derandomization techniques extending methods of Ghaffari, Harris & Kuhn (2017). As a main application, we obtain nearly-optimal algorithms for the long-studied problem of maximum-weight graph matching. Specifically, we get a (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon) approximation algorithm using O~(logΔ/ϵ3+polylog(1/ϵ,loglogn))\tilde O(\log \Delta / \epsilon^3 + \text{polylog}(1/\epsilon, \log \log n)) randomized time and O~(log2Δ/ϵ4+logn/ϵ)\tilde O(\log^2 \Delta / \epsilon^4 + \log^*n / \epsilon) deterministic time. The second application is a faster algorithm for hypergraph maximal matching, a versatile subroutine introduced in Ghaffari et al. (2017) for a variety of local graph algorithms. This gives an algorithm for (2Δ1)(2 \Delta - 1)-edge-list coloring in O~(log2Δlogn)\tilde O(\log^2 \Delta \log n) rounds deterministically or O~((loglogn)3)\tilde O( (\log \log n)^3 ) rounds randomly. Another consequence (with additional optimizations) is an algorithm which generates an edge-orientation with out-degree at most (1+ϵ)λ\lceil (1+\epsilon) \lambda \rceil for a graph of arboricity λ\lambda; for fixed ϵ\epsilon this runs in O~(log6n)\tilde O(\log^6 n) rounds deterministically or O~(log3n)\tilde O(\log^3 n ) rounds randomly
    corecore