4 research outputs found
Development of a cognitive mnemonic scheme for an optical Smart-technology of remote learning of the Experions PKS distributed control system on the basis of Artificial Immune Systems
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Smart-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Experion PKS ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ Honeywell Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ»ΠΈ. ΠΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 70 % Π°Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ. Π Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π·ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ°Π³Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΡ Π½Π° Π·ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΈ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ Honeywell. ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ ΠΠ ΠΠΠ Π Π Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° β ΠΠ 09258508 Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ: Β«Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈΒ» (2021 β 2023 Π³Π³.)
Inductive Pattern Formation
With the extended computational limits of algorithmic recursion, scientific investigation is transitioning
away from computationally decidable problems and beginning to address computationally undecidable complexity. The analysis of deductive inference in structure-property models are yielding to the synthesis of inductive inference in process-structure simulations. Process-structure modeling has examined external order parameters of inductive pattern formation, but investigation of the internal order parameters of self-organization have been hampered by the lack of a mathematical formalism with the ability to quantitatively define a specific configuration of points.
This investigation addressed this issue of quantitative synthesis. Local space was developed by the
Poincare inflation of a set of points to construct neighborhood intersections, defining topological distance and introducing situated Boolean topology as a local replacement for point-set topology. Parallel development of the local semi-metric topological space, the local semi-metric probability space, and the local metric space of a set of points provides a triangulation of connectivity measures to define the quantitative architectural identity of a configuration and structure independent axes of a structural configuration space. The recursive sequence of intersections constructs a probabilistic discrete spacetime model of interacting fields to define the internal order parameters of self-organization, with order parameters external to the configuration modeled by adjusting the morphological parameters of individual neighborhoods and the interplay of excitatory and inhibitory point sets. The evolutionary trajectory of a configuration maps the development of specific hierarchical structure that is emergent from a specific set of initial conditions, with nested boundaries signaling the nonlinear properties of local causative configurations. This exploration of architectural configuration space concluded with initial process-structure-property models of deductive and inductive inference spaces.
In the computationally undecidable problem of human niche construction, an adaptive-inductive pattern formation model with predictive control organized the bipartite recursion between an information structure and its physical expression as hierarchical ensembles of artificial neural network-like structures. The union of architectural identity and bipartite recursion generates a predictive structural model of an evolutionary design process, offering an alternative to the limitations of cognitive descriptive modeling. The low computational complexity of these models enable them to be embedded in physical constructions to create the artificial life forms of a real-time autonomously adaptive human habitat
Empirically characterizing evolvability and changeability in engineering systems
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012."June 2012." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 205-212).The beginning phases of system development and conceptual design require careful consideration, as these decisions will have significant influence on system lifetime performance and are often made with incomplete system knowledge. Decision makers may improve their capacity to discriminate between system concepts and design choices by measuring a system's "ilities" such as changeability, evolvability, and survivability. These ilities may enable systems to respond to perturbations in the design space, context space, and needs space in order to ensure system functionality and adequate performance over time. A system may be designed to change in response to perturbations, or remain statically robust/survivable to perturbations in order to avoid deficiencies or failures. This research attempts to analyze the mechanisms that allow system changes to occur. More specifically, this research will further the characterization of system changeability and evolvability and ultimately provide a structured and meaningful way of classifying system characteristics often described as "ilities". Value sustainment is proposed as an ultimate goal of systems, providing value in spite of perturbations in design, context, or needs. The premise of value sustainment is investigated through four distinct research thrusts: 1) a basis for defining system changes and ilities; 2) a system change examples database with categorical cluster analysis case research; 3) epoch-shift, impact, response, outcome case research; and 4) expert interviews case research. Focusing on change-related ilities, this research proposes constructs for identifying and enabling vague, yet desirable, system properties. Evolvability is characterized as a subset of changeability and defined as the ability of an architecture to be inherited and changed across generations [over time], with a set of ten proposed design principles including decentralization, redundancy, targeted modularity, scalability, integrability, reconfigurability, mimicry, leverage ancestry, disruptive architectural overhaul, and resourceful exaptation.by Jay Clark Beesemyer, Jr.S.M
On engineering smart systems
A smart system exhibits the four important properties: (i) Interactive, collective, coordinated and efficient Operation (ii) Self -organization and emergence (iii) Power law scaling under emergence (iv) Adaptive. We describe the role of fractal and percolation models for understanding smart systems. A hierarchy based on metric entropy is suggested among the computational systems to differentiate ordinary system from the smart system. Engineering a general purpose smart system is not feasible, since emergence is a global behaviour (or a goal) that evolves from the local behaviour (goals) of components. This is due to the fact that the evolutionary rules for the global goal is non-computable, as it cannot be expressed as a finite composition of computable function of local goals for any arbitrary problem domain