34,642 research outputs found
A Type-coherent, Expressive Representation as an Initial Step to Language Understanding
A growing interest in tasks involving language understanding by the NLP
community has led to the need for effective semantic parsing and inference.
Modern NLP systems use semantic representations that do not quite fulfill the
nuanced needs for language understanding: adequately modeling language
semantics, enabling general inferences, and being accurately recoverable. This
document describes underspecified logical forms (ULF) for Episodic Logic (EL),
which is an initial form for a semantic representation that balances these
needs. ULFs fully resolve the semantic type structure while leaving issues such
as quantifier scope, word sense, and anaphora unresolved; they provide a
starting point for further resolution into EL, and enable certain structural
inferences without further resolution. This document also presents preliminary
results of creating a hand-annotated corpus of ULFs for the purpose of training
a precise ULF parser, showing a three-person pairwise interannotator agreement
of 0.88 on confident annotations. We hypothesize that a divide-and-conquer
approach to semantic parsing starting with derivation of ULFs will lead to
semantic analyses that do justice to subtle aspects of linguistic meaning, and
will enable construction of more accurate semantic parsers.Comment: Accepted for publication at The 13th International Conference on
Computational Semantics (IWCS 2019
Modeling Target-Side Inflection in Neural Machine Translation
NMT systems have problems with large vocabulary sizes. Byte-pair encoding
(BPE) is a popular approach to solving this problem, but while BPE allows the
system to generate any target-side word, it does not enable effective
generalization over the rich vocabulary in morphologically rich languages with
strong inflectional phenomena. We introduce a simple approach to overcome this
problem by training a system to produce the lemma of a word and its
morphologically rich POS tag, which is then followed by a deterministic
generation step. We apply this strategy for English-Czech and English-German
translation scenarios, obtaining improvements in both settings. We furthermore
show that the improvement is not due to only adding explicit morphological
information.Comment: Accepted as a research paper at WMT17. (Updated version with
corrected references.
Automatic summarising: factors and directions
This position paper suggests that progress with automatic summarising demands
a better research methodology and a carefully focussed research strategy. In
order to develop effective procedures it is necessary to identify and respond
to the context factors, i.e. input, purpose, and output factors, that bear on
summarising and its evaluation. The paper analyses and illustrates these
factors and their implications for evaluation. It then argues that this
analysis, together with the state of the art and the intrinsic difficulty of
summarising, imply a nearer-term strategy concentrating on shallow, but not
surface, text analysis and on indicative summarising. This is illustrated with
current work, from which a potentially productive research programme can be
developed
A Deep Architecture for Semantic Parsing
Many successful approaches to semantic parsing build on top of the syntactic
analysis of text, and make use of distributional representations or statistical
models to match parses to ontology-specific queries. This paper presents a
novel deep learning architecture which provides a semantic parsing system
through the union of two neural models of language semantics. It allows for the
generation of ontology-specific queries from natural language statements and
questions without the need for parsing, which makes it especially suitable to
grammatically malformed or syntactically atypical text, such as tweets, as well
as permitting the development of semantic parsers for resource-poor languages.Comment: In Proceedings of the Semantic Parsing Workshop at ACL 2014
(forthcoming
- …