Near-Linear Time Insertion-Deletion Codes and (1+ε\varepsilon)-Approximating Edit Distance via Indexing

We introduce fast-decodable indexing schemes for edit distance which can be used to speed up edit distance computations to near-linear time if one of the strings is indexed by an indexing string $I$. In particular, for every length $n$ and every $\varepsilon >0$, one can in near linear time construct a string $I \in \Sigma'^n$ with $|\Sigma'| = O_{\varepsilon}(1)$, such that, indexing any string $S \in \Sigma^n$, symbol-by-symbol, with $I$ results in a string $S' \in \Sigma''^n$ where $\Sigma'' = \Sigma \times \Sigma'$ for which edit distance computations are easy, i.e., one can compute a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation of the edit distance between $S'$ and any other string in $O(n \text{poly}(\log n))$ time. Our indexing schemes can be used to improve the decoding complexity of state-of-the-art error correcting codes for insertions and deletions. In particular, they lead to near-linear time decoding algorithms for the insertion-deletion codes of [Haeupler, Shahrasbi; STOC `17] and faster decoding algorithms for list-decodable insertion-deletion codes of [Haeupler, Shahrasbi, Sudan; ICALP `18]. Interestingly, the latter codes are a crucial ingredient in the construction of fast-decodable indexing schemes

On the lengths of divisible codes

In this article, the effective lengths of all $q^r$-divisible linear codes over $\mathbb{F}_q$ with a non-negative integer $r$ are determined. For that purpose, the $S_q(r)$-adic expansion of an integer $n$ is introduced. It is shown that there exists a $q^r$-divisible $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear code of effective length $n$ if and only if the leading coefficient of the $S_q(r)$-adic expansion of $n$ is non-negative. Furthermore, the maximum weight of a $q^r$-divisible code of effective length $n$ is at most $\sigma q^r$, where $\sigma$ denotes the cross-sum of the $S_q(r)$-adic expansion of $n$. This result has applications in Galois geometries. A recent theorem of N{\u{a}}stase and Sissokho on the maximum size of a partial spread follows as a corollary. Furthermore, we get an improvement of the Johnson bound for constant dimension subspace codes.Comment: 17 pages, typos corrected; the paper was originally named "An improvement of the Johnson bound for subspace codes

On the equivalence of linear sets

Let $L$ be a linear set of pseudoregulus type in a line $\ell$ in $\Sigma^*=\mathrm{PG}(t-1,q^t)$, $t=5$ or $t>6$. We provide examples of $q$-order canonical subgeometries $\Sigma_1,\, \Sigma_2 \subset \Sigma^*$ such that there is a $(t-3)$-space $\Gamma \subset \Sigma^*\setminus (\Sigma_1 \cup \Sigma_2 \cup \ell)$ with the property that for $i=1,2$, $L$ is the projection of $\Sigma_i$ from center $\Gamma$ and there exists no collineation $\phi$ of $\Sigma^*$ such that $\Gamma^{\phi}=\Gamma$ and $\Sigma_1^{\phi}=\Sigma_2$. Condition (ii) given in Theorem 3 in Lavrauw and Van de Voorde (Des. Codes Cryptogr. 56:89-104, 2010) states the existence of a collineation between the projecting configurations (each of them consisting of a center and a subgeometry), which give rise by means of projections to two linear sets. It follows from our examples that this condition is not necessary for the equivalence of two linear sets as stated there. We characterize the linear sets for which the condition above is actually necessary.Comment: Preprint version. Referees' suggestions and corrections implemented. The final version is to appear in Designs, Codes and Cryptograph

On effective sigma-boundedness and sigma-compactness

We prove several theorems on sigma-bounded and sigma-compact pointsets. We start with a known theorem by Kechris, saying that any lightface \Sigma^1_1 set of the Baire space either is effectively sigma-bounded (that is, covered by a countable union of compact lightface \Delta^1_1 sets), or contains a superperfect subset (and then the set is not sigma-bounded, of course). We add different generalizations of this result, in particular, 1) such that the boundedness property involved includes covering by compact sets and equivalence classes of a given finite collection of lightface \Delta^1_1 equivalence relations, 2) generalizations to lightface \Sigma^1_2 sets, 3) generalizations true in the Solovay model. As for effective sigma-compactness, we start with a theorem by Louveau, saying that any lightface \Delta^1_1 set of the Baire space either is effectively sigma-compact (that is, is equal to a countable union of compact lightface \Delta^1_1 sets), or it contains a relatively closed superperfect subset. Then we prove a generalization of this result to lightface \Sigma^1_1 sets.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1103.106