4 research outputs found

    Nonlinear Model Predictive Guidance for Fixed-wing UAVs Using Identified Control Augmented Dynamics

    Full text link
    As off-the-shelf (OTS) autopilots become more widely available and user-friendly and the drone market expands, safer, more efficient, and more complex motion planning and control will become necessary for fixed-wing aerial robotic platforms. Considering typical low-level attitude stabilization available on OTS flight controllers, this paper first develops an approach for modeling and identification of the control augmented dynamics for a small fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). A high-level Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller (NMPC) is subsequently formulated for simultaneous airspeed stabilization, path following, and soft constraint handling, using the identified model for horizon propagation. The approach is explored in several exemplary flight experiments including path following of helix and connected Dubins Aircraft segments in high winds as well as a motor failure scenario. The cost function, insights on its weighting, and additional soft constraints used throughout the experimentation are discussed

    A full controller for a fixed-wing UAV

    Full text link
    This paper presents a nonlinear control law for the stabilization of a fixed-wing UAV. Such controller solves the path-following problem and the longitudinal control problem in a single control. Furthermore, the control design is performed considering aerodynamics and state information available in the commercial autopilots with the aim of an ease implementation. It is achieved that the closed-loop system is G.A.S. and robust to external disturbances. The difference among the available controllers in the literature is: 1) it depends on available states, hence it is not required extra sensors or observers; and 2) it is possible to achieve any desired airplane state with an ease of implementation, since its design is performed keeping in mind the capability of implementation in any commercial autopilot

    Whole-Body Control of a Mobile Manipulator using End-to-End Reinforcement Learning

    Full text link
    Mobile manipulation is usually achieved by sequentially executing base and manipulator movements. This simplification, however, leads to a loss in efficiency and in some cases a reduction of workspace size. Even though different methods have been proposed to solve Whole-Body Control (WBC) online, they are either limited by a kinematic model or do not allow for reactive, online obstacle avoidance. In order to overcome these drawbacks, in this work, we propose an end-to-end Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach to WBC. We compared our learned controller against a state-of-the-art sampling-based method in simulation and achieved faster overall mission times. In addition, we validated the learned policy on our mobile manipulator RoyalPanda in challenging narrow corridor environments.Comment: 6 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables, submitted to RA-L/IRO

    On Flying Backwards: Preventing Run-away of Small, Low-speed, Fixed-wing UAVs in Strong Winds

    Full text link
    Small, low-speed fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operating autonomously, beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) will inevitably encounter winds rising to levels near or exceeding the vehicles' nominal airspeed. In this paper, we develop a nonlinear lateral-directional path following guidance law with explicit consideration of online wind estimates. Energy efficient airspeed reference compensation logic is developed for excess wind scenarios (i.e. when the wind speed rises above the airspeed), enabling either mitigation, prevention, or over-powering of excess wind induced run-away from a given path. The developed guidance law is demonstrated on a representative small, low-speed test UAV in two flight experiments conducted in mountainous regions of Switzerland with strong, turbulent wind conditions, gusts reaching up to 13 meters per second. We demonstrate track-keeping errors of less than 1 meter consistently maintained during a representative duration of gusting, excess winds and a mean ground speed undershoot of 0.5 meters per second from the commanded minimum forward ground speed demonstrated in over 5 minutes of the showcased flight results.Comment: Preprint of a paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 201
    corecore