11,661 research outputs found

    Random subtrees of complete graphs

    Full text link
    We study the asymptotic behavior of four statistics associated with subtrees of complete graphs: the uniform probability pnp_n that a random subtree is a spanning tree of KnK_n, the weighted probability qnq_n (where the probability a subtree is chosen is proportional to the number of edges in the subtree) that a random subtree spans and the two expectations associated with these two probabilities. We find pnp_n and qnq_n both approach eβˆ’eβˆ’1β‰ˆ.692e^{-e^{-1}}\approx .692, while both expectations approach the size of a spanning tree, i.e., a random subtree of KnK_n has approximately nβˆ’1n-1 edges

    The looping rate and sandpile density of planar graphs

    Full text link
    We give a simple formula for the looping rate of loop-erased random walk on a finite planar graph. The looping rate is closely related to the expected amount of sand in a recurrent sandpile on the graph. The looping rate formula is well-suited to taking limits where the graph tends to an infinite lattice, and we use it to give an elementary derivation of the (previously computed) looping rate and sandpile densities of the square, triangular, and honeycomb lattices, and compute (for the first time) the looping rate and sandpile densities of many other lattices, such as the kagome lattice, the dice lattice, and the truncated hexagonal lattice (for which the values are all rational), and the square-octagon lattice (for which it is transcendental)

    Sampling Random Spanning Trees Faster than Matrix Multiplication

    Full text link
    We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in O~(n4/3m1/2+n2)\tilde{O}(n^{4/3}m^{1/2}+n^{2}) time (The O~(β‹…)\tilde{O}(\cdot) notation hides polylog⁑(n)\operatorname{polylog}(n) factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, O(nΟ‰)O(n^\omega). For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of O~(min⁑{nΟ‰,mn,m4/3})\tilde{O}(\min\{n^{\omega},m\sqrt{n},m^{4/3}\}) for m≫n5/3m \gg n^{5/3} (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute Ο΅\epsilon-approximate effective resistances for a set SS of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in O~(m+(n+∣S∣)Ο΅βˆ’2)\tilde{O}(m+(n + |S|)\epsilon^{-2}) time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires O~(min⁑{(m+∣S∣)Ο΅βˆ’2,m+nΟ΅βˆ’4+∣Sβˆ£Ο΅βˆ’2})\tilde{O}( \min\{(m + |S|)\epsilon^{-2}, m+n\epsilon^{-4} +|S|\epsilon^{-2}\}) time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate

    Spanning trees of graphs on surfaces and the intensity of loop-erased random walk on planar graphs

    Full text link
    We show how to compute the probabilities of various connection topologies for uniformly random spanning trees on graphs embedded in surfaces. As an application, we show how to compute the "intensity" of the loop-erased random walk in Z2{\mathbb Z}^2, that is, the probability that the walk from (0,0) to infinity passes through a given vertex or edge. For example, the probability that it passes through (1,0) is 5/16; this confirms a conjecture from 1994 about the stationary sandpile density on Z2{\mathbb Z}^2. We do the analogous computation for the triangular lattice, honeycomb lattice and ZΓ—R{\mathbb Z} \times {\mathbb R}, for which the probabilities are 5/18, 13/36, and 1/4βˆ’1/Ο€21/4-1/\pi^2 respectively.Comment: 45 pages, many figures. v2 has an expanded introduction, a revised section on the LERW intensity, and an expanded appendix on the annular matri
    • …
    corecore