Ceramics and Society in Northern Europe

Neolithic pottery in Britain and Ireland was produced from shortly after 4000 BC. There are regional variations but overall a four phase chronology for the pottery is also suggested: First Neolithic, approximately 4000–3800 BC; Early Neolithic, approximately 3800–3500 BC; Middle Neolithic, approximately 3500–2900 BC; and Late Neolithic, approximately 2900–2400 BC. Within this framework evidence for the processes of pottery production and use are studied to define a number of different traditions and practices. The external form of vessels seems to be strongly codified in the early part of the period, although there was a range of different inclusion recipes used. In the Middle and Later Neolithic there seem to be much simpler fabrics but a greater range of vessel shapes. This later pottery also seems to have been used for a much wider range of tasks

Insights on the changing dynamics of cemetery use in the neolithic and chalcolithic of southern Portugal. Radiocarbon dating of Lugar do Canto Cave (Santarém)

Lugar do Canto Cave is one of the most relevant Neolithic burial caves in Portugal given not only its extraordinary preservation conditions at the time of discovery but also the quality of the field record obtained during excavation. Its material culture immediately pointed to a Middle Neolithic cemetery but recent radiocarbon determinations also allowed the recognition of an apparent two step phasing of its use within the period (ca. 4000-3400 cal BC): an older one characterized by a single burial and a later reoccupation as a collective necropolis. Comparisons with other well-dated cave cemeteries in Southern Portugal permitted the recognition of changing funerary practices and strategies of cemetery use during the later stages of the Neolithic and the Chalcolithic: 1) ca. 3800 cal BC as the possible turning point from the practice of individual to collective burials; 2) alternating periods of intensive use and deliberate abandonment of cemeteries (evidenced by their intentional closure). Research avenues to investigate the social organization and ideological context underlying these aspects of the Neolithic communities in greater depth are tentatively pointed out in this paper.FEDER funds through the Programa Operacional Factores de Competividade (COMPETE

Diet uniformity at an early farming community in northwest Anatolia (Turkey) : carbon and nitrogen isotope studies of bone collagen at Aktopraklik

Aktopraklık is a settlement site composed of three areas (A–C) in the Marmara region of northwest Anatolia, with phases of occupation that date to the Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic periods, mid-seventh to mid-sixth millennium bc (ca. 6400–5600 cal. bc). Here, we present 54 human and fauna bone collagen stable isotope results from the site, alongside five modern fish bone collagen isotope results, to examine the nature of human diet. The stable isotope analysis shows that human diet comprised the consumption of select C3 terrestrial resources, with a preference for domestic animal proteins over plant proteins. The evidence to date suggests that animal husbandry was at the forefront of Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic subsistence practices. No isotopic difference in humans is observed between biological sex or between areas B and C at the settlement

Build n burn: using fire as a tool to evoke, educate and entertain

The visceral nature of fire was exploited in the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods in Britain by the burning down of timber buildings and monuments, as well as the cremation of the dead. These big fires would have created memories, perhaps even ‘flashbulb memories’, and this powerful mnemonic aspect of fire was likely of significance to the social and religious lives of individuals, families and communities. This article introduces the Build N Burn concept, where fires are recreated and deployed alongside public talks, performances, experimental archaeology activities and demonstrations by craft specialists to create memorable and informative public events. Three public engagements to date, two on the island of Arran and one in Caithness, both Scotland, are described here. In each case, we constructed replica timber structures inspired by local prehistoric sites, and then burned these down in a free-to-attend public event at dusk, evoking the culmination of a prehistoric festival. Build N Burn has, at its core, the principle of delivering memorable experiences for the public inspired by prehistory, underpinned by research and experiment, using events which draw on cross-sectoral collaboration and working with local communities. This article offers a critical reflection on work to date, and discusses future potential for such activities, utilizing the mnemonic power and transformational potential of fire for public engagement and experimental archaeology

Domesticating Mathematics: Taxonomic Diversity in Archaeozoological Assemblages

Understanding taxonomic richness is indispensable in studying the choices made in the exploitation of the local fauna such as those of the broad-spectrum revolution in the Near East. Such investigations, however, sometimes disregard the stochastic nature of human decision-making, while others present complex mathematical models. The basic nature of samples is rarely discussed. The fundamental thesis of our study is that assemblages of different sizes can be compared only exercising extreme caution. When species richness is studied as a function of assemblage size, the remains of birds, large and “micro-” mammals show strongly differing statistics. Diversity increases along with the number of identifiable bones in the case of birds, while the same trend is most protracted in the case of large mammals. This means that taxonomic diversity in animal bone assemblages is a function of not only assemblage size but also of taxonomic composition. The structure of “input” data is thus qualitatively dependent on assemblage size. The underlying factors influencing the archaeological representation of the fauna, including sampling, anatomical and taphonomic traits of the three types of vertebrates are discussed by animal groups. Taxonomically different animal remains should not be included within the same faunal list as their culture historical interpretations (animal keeping, hunting, random natural deposition) also differ. These phenomena must all be considered when a reliable interpretation of animal remains is attempted in various archaeological periods. A régészeti állatcsont-anyagok fajgazdagságának megértése nélkülözhetetlen olyan kérdések kutatásában, mint pl. a közel-keleti őskori közösségek által fogyasztott állatfajok rendszertani spektrumának szélessége, választékának kihasználása. Az ilyen vizsgálatok során sokan figyelmen kívül hagyják az emberi döntések sztochasztikus természetét, míg mások bonyolult matematikai modellekkel igyekeznek leírni azt. A minták alapvető természetére kevesen fordítanak figyelmet. Vizsgálataink alaptétele, hogy a különböző nagyságú minták csak rendkívüli körültekintéssel hasonlíthatók össze. Amikor a meghatározott fajok számát a mintanagyságok függvényében vizsgáljuk, a madarak, a nagytestű emlősállatok és a „mikrofauna” emlős fajai más-más értékeket mutatnak. A fajgazdagság nem lineárisan követi a csontok darabszámának alakulását: ahhoz viszonyítva a madarak esetében növekszik a legintenzívebben, leginkább pedig a nagytestű emlősök csoportjában marad el a mintanagyság gyarapodásától. Eszerint az egyes leletegyüttesek állattani változatossága nemcsak a mintanagyságtól, hanem a taxonómiai összetételtől is függ. Ez azt mutatja, hogy a régészeti értelmezésben már a „bejövő” alapadatok összetétele is minőségileg függ a mintanagyságtól. A tanulmányban körvonalazzuk a háttérben meghúzódó okokat, a három vizsgált gerinces állatcsoport reprezentáltságát meghatározó mintavételi, tafonómiai és anatómiai különbségeket. E maradványok értelmezése nem mosható egybe egyetlen „faunalistában”, hiszen kultúrtörténeti jelentésük (állattartás/vadászat, madarászat és véletlenszerű, természetes lerakódás) is változó. Mindez nem mellőzhető az állatok különböző régészeti korszakokban játszott szerepének hitelességre törekvő értékelésekor