Necessary Condition for Near Optimal Control of Linear Forward-backward Stochastic Differential Equations

This paper investigates the near optimal control for a kind of linear stochastic control systems governed by the forward backward stochastic differential equations, where both the drift and diffusion terms are allowed to depend on controls and the control domain is not assumed to be convex. In the previous work (Theorem 3.1) of the second and third authors [\textit{% Automatica} \textbf{46} (2010) 397-404], some problem of near optimal control with the control dependent diffusion is addressed and our current paper can be viewed as some direct response to it. The necessary condition of the near-optimality is established within the framework of optimality variational principle developed by Yong [\textit{SIAM J. Control Optim.} \textbf{48} (2010) 4119--4156] and obtained by the convergence technique to treat the optimal control of FBSDEs in unbounded control domains by Wu [% \textit{Automatica} \textbf{49} (2013) 1473--1480]. Some new estimates are given here to handle the near optimality. In addition, an illustrating example is discussed as well.Comment: To appear in International Journal of Contro

Jump-Diffusion Risk-Sensitive Asset Management I: Diffusion Factor Model

This paper considers a portfolio optimization problem in which asset prices are represented by SDEs driven by Brownian motion and a Poisson random measure, with drifts that are functions of an auxiliary diffusion factor process. The criterion, following earlier work by Bielecki, Pliska, Nagai and others, is risk-sensitive optimization (equivalent to maximizing the expected growth rate subject to a constraint on variance.) By using a change of measure technique introduced by Kuroda and Nagai we show that the problem reduces to solving a certain stochastic control problem in the factor process, which has no jumps. The main result of the paper is to show that the risk-sensitive jump diffusion problem can be fully characterized in terms of a parabolic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDE rather than a PIDE, and that this PDE admits a classical C^{1,2} solution.Comment: 33 page