352 research outputs found

    ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ์† ๋ฃจ๋จธ ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง๊ณผ ์–ดํ…์…˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ๊น€์ข…๊ถŒ.Social media has been a great disseminator for new information and thoughts. Due to its accessibility of sharing information, however, social media has also become an ideal platform for propagations of rumors, fake news, and misinformation. Rumors on social media not only mislead the users of online but also affects the real world immensely. Thus, detecting the rumors and preventing their spread became an essential task. Previous learning-based rumor detection methods adopted to use contents, users, or propagation features of rumors. However, the methods are limited to represent rumor propagation as static graphs, which arent optimal for capturing the dynamic information of the rumors. In this study, we propose a novel graph convolutional networks with attention mechanism model named, Dynamic GCN, for rumor detection. We first represent rumor posts with their responsive posts as dynamic graphs. The temporal information is used to generate a sequence of graph snapshots. The representation learning on graph snapshots with attention mechanism captures both structural and temporal information of rumor spreads. The conducted experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that our model, Dynamic GCN, achieves superior results over the state-of-the-art models in the rumor detection task.์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด๋Š” ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ์ •๋ณด ์ „๋‹ฌ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋งค์ฒด๋กœ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ •๋ณด์™€ ์ƒ๊ฐ์˜ ์ „ํŒŒ ์ฐฝ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ธ ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ฑ์€ ๋•Œ๋ก  ๋ฃจ๋จธ, ๊ฐ€์งœ ๋‰ด์Šค, ์ž˜๋ชป๋œ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ „ํŒŒ์—์„œ๋„ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ํ”Œ๋žซํผ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ์† ๋ฃจ๋จธ๋Š” ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์˜ค๋„ํ•  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋•Œ๋ก  ํ˜„์‹ค ์„ธ๊ณ„์—๋„ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ, ๋ฃจ๋จธ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ์ „ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ๋ง‰๋Š” ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฃจ๋จธ ํƒ์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฃจ๋จธ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž, ๋˜๋Š” ์ „ํŒŒ ๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฃจ๋จธ์˜ ์ „ํŒŒ๋ฅผ ์ •์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋Š” ๋ฃจ๋จธ์˜ ๋™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํฌ์ฐฉํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (graph convolutional networks: GCN)๊ณผ ์–ดํ…์…˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜ (attention mechanism)์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋™์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๊ณฑ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (Dynamic GCN) ๋ฃจ๋จธ ํƒ์ง€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์†Œ์…œ ๋ฏธ๋””์–ด ์† ๋ฃจ๋จธ ๊ฒŒ์‹œ๊ธ€๋“ค (posts) ๊ณผ ๊ทธ์˜ ๋‹ต์žฅ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ธ€๋“ค(responsive posts)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฃจ๋จธ์˜ ์ „ํŒŒ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ •์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „ํŒŒ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ •์  ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์˜ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์ธ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์Šค๋ƒ…์ˆ (graph snapshot) ์‹œํ€€์Šค (sequence)๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ์–ดํ…์…˜ ๋ฉ”์ปค๋‹ˆ์ฆ˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ์Šค๋ƒ…์ˆ ํ‘œํ˜„ ํ•™์Šต์€ ๋ฃจ๋จธ ์ „ํŒŒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ ํŠธ์œ„ํ„ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋น„๊ต ๋ชจ๋ธ๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.Chapter I Introduction 1 Chapter II Related Work 5 2.1 Rumor Detection 5 2.2 Graph Convolutional Networks 6 2.3 Learning Sequences & Attention Mechanism 7 Chapter III Problem Definition 9 Chapter IV Dynamic GCN with Attention Mechanism 11 4.1 Snapshot Generation 13 4.2 Graph Convolutional Networks 14 4.3 Readout Layer 15 4.4 Attention Mechanism 16 4.5 Training & Prediction 17 Chapter V Experiments 18 5.1 Datasets 18 5.2 Baselines 20 5.3 Experimental Setup & Implementation Details 21 5.4 Performance Evaluations 24 5.5 Ablation Study 25 Chapter VI Conclusion 30 Bibliography 31 ์ดˆ ๋ก 40Maste

    Fake News Detection Through Graph-based Neural Networks: A Survey

    Full text link
    The popularity of online social networks has enabled rapid dissemination of information. People now can share and consume information much more rapidly than ever before. However, low-quality and/or accidentally/deliberately fake information can also spread rapidly. This can lead to considerable and negative impacts on society. Identifying, labelling and debunking online misinformation as early as possible has become an increasingly urgent problem. Many methods have been proposed to detect fake news including many deep learning and graph-based approaches. In recent years, graph-based methods have yielded strong results, as they can closely model the social context and propagation process of online news. In this paper, we present a systematic review of fake news detection studies based on graph-based and deep learning-based techniques. We classify existing graph-based methods into knowledge-driven methods, propagation-based methods, and heterogeneous social context-based methods, depending on how a graph structure is constructed to model news related information flows. We further discuss the challenges and open problems in graph-based fake news detection and identify future research directions.Comment: 18 pages, 3 tables, 7 figure

    Probing Spurious Correlations in Popular Event-Based Rumor Detection Benchmarks

    Full text link
    As social media becomes a hotbed for the spread of misinformation, the crucial task of rumor detection has witnessed promising advances fostered by open-source benchmark datasets. Despite being widely used, we find that these datasets suffer from spurious correlations, which are ignored by existing studies and lead to severe overestimation of existing rumor detection performance. The spurious correlations stem from three causes: (1) event-based data collection and labeling schemes assign the same veracity label to multiple highly similar posts from the same underlying event; (2) merging multiple data sources spuriously relates source identities to veracity labels; and (3) labeling bias. In this paper, we closely investigate three of the most popular rumor detection benchmark datasets (i.e., Twitter15, Twitter16 and PHEME), and propose event-separated rumor detection as a solution to eliminate spurious cues. Under the event-separated setting, we observe that the accuracy of existing state-of-the-art models drops significantly by over 40%, becoming only comparable to a simple neural classifier. To better address this task, we propose Publisher Style Aggregation (PSA), a generalizable approach that aggregates publisher posting records to learn writing style and veracity stance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and generalizability.Comment: Accepted to ECML-PKDD 202

    Graph Learning for Anomaly Analytics: Algorithms, Applications, and Challenges

    Full text link
    Anomaly analytics is a popular and vital task in various research contexts, which has been studied for several decades. At the same time, deep learning has shown its capacity in solving many graph-based tasks like, node classification, link prediction, and graph classification. Recently, many studies are extending graph learning models for solving anomaly analytics problems, resulting in beneficial advances in graph-based anomaly analytics techniques. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of graph learning methods for anomaly analytics tasks. We classify them into four categories based on their model architectures, namely graph convolutional network (GCN), graph attention network (GAT), graph autoencoder (GAE), and other graph learning models. The differences between these methods are also compared in a systematic manner. Furthermore, we outline several graph-based anomaly analytics applications across various domains in the real world. Finally, we discuss five potential future research directions in this rapidly growing field

    False News On Social Media: A Data-Driven Survey

    Full text link
    In the past few years, the research community has dedicated growing interest to the issue of false news circulating on social networks. The widespread attention on detecting and characterizing false news has been motivated by considerable backlashes of this threat against the real world. As a matter of fact, social media platforms exhibit peculiar characteristics, with respect to traditional news outlets, which have been particularly favorable to the proliferation of deceptive information. They also present unique challenges for all kind of potential interventions on the subject. As this issue becomes of global concern, it is also gaining more attention in academia. The aim of this survey is to offer a comprehensive study on the recent advances in terms of detection, characterization and mitigation of false news that propagate on social media, as well as the challenges and the open questions that await future research on the field. We use a data-driven approach, focusing on a classification of the features that are used in each study to characterize false information and on the datasets used for instructing classification methods. At the end of the survey, we highlight emerging approaches that look most promising for addressing false news
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore